The Relation of Science and Religion.pdf - Online Christian Library
The Relation of Science and Religion.pdf - Online Christian Library The Relation of Science and Religion.pdf - Online Christian Library
EXPERIENCE EiPOM PAST CONFLICTS. 73~css was upon the face of the deep," and recordsthe will of the Supreme Ruler at alater stage in these words, " And God saidlet the waters under the heaven be gatheredtogether into one place, and let the dry landappear," * does something quite the oppositeiof teaching that " the earth is a flat surface."Nor do the Scriptures teach that "theearth sustains the dome of the sky." In remotetimes such an opinion as to the restingplacefor the great dome had its supporters.But there is no pretext for attributing theteaching of this to the Bible. The scripturalstatement is " God made the firmament, anddivided the waters which were under the firmamentfrom the waters which were above thefirmament; and it was so. And God calledthe firmament Heaven." There is no readerof these words, even if he have only " an uncriticalobservation of the aspect of nature,"who can suppose that the " firmament " heremeans " the dome of the sky." This statementplaces certain waters " above the firmament,"and there is no one who is at oncea reader of the Bible, and an observer of nature,who thinks of the clouds as above the* Genesis i. 2, 9.
74 SCIENCE AND RELIGION.sky; but every one knows that there is anexpanse which bears these water treasuresfar up from the earth's surface. The wordrendered "firmament17'* from the Vulgate$rnzccmentunz, really means " expanse," andmost naturally and obviously refers to theatmosphere surrounding the earth, uponwhich the clouds are borne aloft, and carriedto and fro. Taking into account the wantof scientific knowledge of the structure of theearth in far past ages, and the representationsinconsistent with facts which found currency,the true marvel is that the statementsof Scripture so simply and naturally har~nonizewith discoveries not made till the sixteenthcentury of the Christian era. This isa marvel which will more deeply iqpress usthe longer it is pondered.If we extend our consideration to the crudernotions which found acceptance in the darkages, such as that to which Bruno referred,that the earth is a flat surface, supported onpill~lrs, the scriptural evidence pled in itsfavor appears grotesquely inadequate. Thepassages are these. First stands Hannah's* y:~, Raqia, from y?? to spread out.
- Page 44 and 45: 24 SCIENCE AND RELIGION.line of dis
- Page 46 and 47: EVOLUTION AND CHRISTIANITY.DARWIN A
- Page 48 and 49: CONDITIONS OF THE INQUIRI'. 27While
- Page 50 and 51: CONDITIONS OR THE: INQUIRY. 29precl
- Page 52 and 53: COATDZTrONS OF ?.E! INQUIRY. 81I co
- Page 54 and 55: CONDITIONS OF THE INQUIRY. 33such a
- Page 56 and 57: CONDITIONS OF THE INQUZR Y. 35assum
- Page 58 and 59: CONDITIONS OF THE INQUIR Y. 37There
- Page 60 and 61: CONDITIONS OF THE INQUIRY. 39sign o
- Page 62 and 63: CONDZTZONS OF TNE ZNQUZRII: 41only
- Page 64 and 65: LECTURE 11.EXPERIENCE GATHERED FROM
- Page 66 and 67: EXPERIENCE: LWOM PAST CONFLICTS. 45
- Page 68 and 69: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 47v
- Page 70 and 71: EXPERIENCE I;ROM PAST CONFLICTS. 49
- Page 72 and 73: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 51t
- Page 74 and 75: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONPLICTS. 53v
- Page 76 and 77: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLXTS. 55ni
- Page 78 and 79: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 67s
- Page 80 and 81: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 59n
- Page 82 and 83: BXPERTEKCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 61o
- Page 84 and 85: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 63o
- Page 86 and 87: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 65t
- Page 88 and 89: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 67s
- Page 90 and 91: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 69D
- Page 92 and 93: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLXTS. 71in
- Page 96 and 97: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 75o
- Page 98 and 99: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 77t
- Page 100 and 101: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 79e
- Page 102 and 103: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 81e
- Page 104 and 105: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 83ture within c
- Page 106 and 107: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 85universe, inv
- Page 108 and 109: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 87existence to
- Page 110 and 111: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 89even jolt, in
- Page 112 and 113: ZA.'OX'GANZC ELEMENTS. 91no theory
- Page 114 and 115: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 93thus without
- Page 116 and 117: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 95of nature, as
- Page 118 and 119: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 97head before t
- Page 120 and 121: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 99As we have se
- Page 122 and 123: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 101" itself to
- Page 124 and 125: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 103of energy ca
- Page 126 and 127: INORGANIC ELEMENTS.l05flective and
- Page 128 and 129: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 107and a contin
- Page 130 and 131: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 109ergy distinc
- Page 132 and 133: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 111physical sci
- Page 134 and 135: INORGANIC ELEMZNTS. 113tion." * Suc
- Page 136 and 137: INORGANIC ELEMENTS.l15forever uncha
- Page 138 and 139: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 117can be origi
- Page 140 and 141: LECTURE IT.ORGANIZED EXISTENCE: LIF
- Page 142 and 143: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 121harmon
EXPERIENCE EiPOM PAST CONFLICTS. 73~css was upon the face <strong>of</strong> the deep," <strong>and</strong> recordsthe will <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Ruler at alater stage in these words, " And God saidlet the waters under the heaven be gatheredtogether into one place, <strong>and</strong> let the dry l<strong>and</strong>appear," * does something quite the oppositei<strong>of</strong> teaching that " the earth is a flat surface."Nor do the Scriptures teach that "theearth sustains the dome <strong>of</strong> the sky." In remotetimes such an opinion as to the restingplacefor the great dome had its supporters.But there is no pretext for attributing theteaching <strong>of</strong> this to the Bible. <strong>The</strong> scripturalstatement is " God made the firmament, <strong>and</strong>divided the waters which were under the firmamentfrom the waters which were above thefirmament; <strong>and</strong> it was so. And God calledthe firmament Heaven." <strong>The</strong>re is no reader<strong>of</strong> these words, even if he have only " an uncriticalobservation <strong>of</strong> the aspect <strong>of</strong> nature,"who can suppose that the " firmament " heremeans " the dome <strong>of</strong> the sky." This statementplaces certain waters " above the firmament,"<strong>and</strong> there is no one who is at oncea reader <strong>of</strong> the Bible, <strong>and</strong> an observer <strong>of</strong> nature,who thinks <strong>of</strong> the clouds as above the* Genesis i. 2, 9.