The Relation of Science and Religion.pdf - Online Christian Library
The Relation of Science and Religion.pdf - Online Christian Library The Relation of Science and Religion.pdf - Online Christian Library
INORGANIC ELEMZNTS. 113tion." * Such a statement of the position,though it can not be regarded as an ultimateone in scientific research, is so obviously adeduction from present knowledge that itmust to some extent modify prevailing conceptions.It may, indeed be suggested thatsome catastrophe may terminate the presentorder of things, and that some action of thelaw of gravitation may combine the fragmentsof worlds, and give a fresh start with newcombinations of energy; but the bare suggestionof this implies a much wider rangefor scientific research than any thing yetknown to us, and at the same time a largerdemand upon intelligence in the control andregulation of what must nevertheless seem tous violent catastrophes. Such speculation,if it may warrantably find encouragementunder purely scientific conditions, religiousthought will neither gainsay nor resist; butwill find itself in no perplexity to accept.Waiving, however, all speculation as to thepossible future of the physical universe, wehere concentrate attention on the past; wetake the most recent scientific testimony asto the structure of the physical universe, ;tsRecent Advances, p. 20.
11.4 SCIENCE AND RELIGION.it bears on the problem concerning the originof our world. Here the testimony of scienceis clearly and unmistakably in favor ofthe creation or absolute origin of matter andenergy, in the only form in which sciencecan bear any testimony on the subject. It is,of course, impossible that science should presentdirect testimony to the fact of creation, asit is impossible that history should; for such afact as creation must be entirely beyond therange of science. But in testifying to theindestructibility and uncreatability of matterunder the conditions capable of being investigatedby observational science; and in bearingthe same testimony as to the energy in theworld, it offers all the support it is capable ofoffering to the reality of the supernatural,-testifying to the dependence of nature on somepower altogether transcending itself. Buthere I prefer rather to use the words of apurely scientific observer. When dealing withthe doctrine of energy, and specially with theconsequences of dissipation of energy, ProfessorTait uses these words,-" As it alone isable to lead us, by sure steps of deductive reasoning,to the necessary future of the universe-necessary, that is, if physical laws remain
- Page 84 and 85: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 63o
- Page 86 and 87: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 65t
- Page 88 and 89: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 67s
- Page 90 and 91: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 69D
- Page 92 and 93: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLXTS. 71in
- Page 94 and 95: EXPERIENCE EiPOM PAST CONFLICTS. 73
- Page 96 and 97: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 75o
- Page 98 and 99: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 77t
- Page 100 and 101: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 79e
- Page 102 and 103: EXPERIENCE FROM PAST CONFLICTS. 81e
- Page 104 and 105: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 83ture within c
- Page 106 and 107: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 85universe, inv
- Page 108 and 109: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 87existence to
- Page 110 and 111: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 89even jolt, in
- Page 112 and 113: ZA.'OX'GANZC ELEMENTS. 91no theory
- Page 114 and 115: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 93thus without
- Page 116 and 117: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 95of nature, as
- Page 118 and 119: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 97head before t
- Page 120 and 121: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 99As we have se
- Page 122 and 123: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 101" itself to
- Page 124 and 125: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 103of energy ca
- Page 126 and 127: INORGANIC ELEMENTS.l05flective and
- Page 128 and 129: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 107and a contin
- Page 130 and 131: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 109ergy distinc
- Page 132 and 133: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 111physical sci
- Page 136 and 137: INORGANIC ELEMENTS.l15forever uncha
- Page 138 and 139: INORGANIC ELEMENTS. 117can be origi
- Page 140 and 141: LECTURE IT.ORGANIZED EXISTENCE: LIF
- Page 142 and 143: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 121harmon
- Page 144 and 145: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 123a work
- Page 146 and 147: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 125all th
- Page 148 and 149: LIFE AIVD ITS DE TELOPMENT. 127the
- Page 150 and 151: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT.l29scienti
- Page 152 and 153: LIFE AND ITS DE YELOPMENT. 131ment
- Page 154 and 155: LIFE AND ITS DEPrELOPMENT. 133anima
- Page 156 and 157: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 135though
- Page 158 and 159: LIRE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 137gestio
- Page 160 and 161: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 139still
- Page 162 and 163: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 141%~L?te
- Page 164 and 165: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 143tinuou
- Page 166 and 167: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 145time i
- Page 168 and 169: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 147done w
- Page 170 and 171: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 149quence
- Page 172 and 173: LIFE AND ITS DE YEL OPMENT. 151comp
- Page 174 and 175: LIFE AND ITS DE YELOPMENT. 153clusi
- Page 176 and 177: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 155speak
- Page 178 and 179: LIFE AND ITS DE EEL OPIMENT. 157Thi
- Page 180 and 181: countered and leads to survival of
- Page 182 and 183: LIFE AND ITS DEVELOPMENT. 161time,
INORGANIC ELEMZNTS. 113tion." * Such a statement <strong>of</strong> the position,though it can not be regarded as an ultimateone in scientific research, is so obviously adeduction from present knowledge that itmust to some extent modify prevailing conceptions.It may, indeed be suggested thatsome catastrophe may terminate the presentorder <strong>of</strong> things, <strong>and</strong> that some action <strong>of</strong> thelaw <strong>of</strong> gravitation may combine the fragments<strong>of</strong> worlds, <strong>and</strong> give a fresh start with newcombinations <strong>of</strong> energy; but the bare suggestion<strong>of</strong> this implies a much wider rangefor scientific research than any thing yetknown to us, <strong>and</strong> at the same time a largerdem<strong>and</strong> upon intelligence in the control <strong>and</strong>regulation <strong>of</strong> what must nevertheless seem tous violent catastrophes. Such speculation,if it may warrantably find encouragementunder purely scientific conditions, religiousthought will neither gainsay nor resist; butwill find itself in no perplexity to accept.Waiving, however, all speculation as to thepossible future <strong>of</strong> the physical universe, wehere concentrate attention on the past; wetake the most recent scientific testimony asto the structure <strong>of</strong> the physical universe, ;tsRecent Advances, p. 20.