The Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve REDD Project

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 4 of this study gives a net production of industrialroundwood (IR) of 12 Tg C in 1990.Table 5 gives a value of 3 Tg of wood going into long-‐termwood products (use >5 yr; definition of long-‐termaccording to FAO definition).In all the following tables, starting in year 11, the rows areshaded since these estimates are to be consideredapproximates and a revised baseline will need to becalculated before year 10 and re-‐validated.Thus, the percent of harvest logs (IR produced for all ofIndonesia) going into long-‐term wood products is 3/12=25%. The remainder (short-‐term use
Year ofProjectArea loggedyr-‐1Table 21. Annual CO 2 e emissions from timber extraction (t CO 2 e yr-‐1)Annual CO 2 e emissions from timber extraction (t CO 2 e yr-‐1)Concession 1Borneo Eka SawitTangguhConcession 2Graha Indo SawitAndal TunggalConcession 3Wahana AgroTama MakmurConcession 4Rimba SawitUtama PlanindoAnnual total (tCO 2 e yr -‐1)CumulativeTotal (t CO 2 e)1 2000 136,253 0 0 0 136,253 136,2532 4000 136,253 129,286 0 0 265,539 401,7913 6000 136,253 129,286 99,596 0 365,135 766,9264 6,287 19,552 129,286 99,596 80,844 329,278 1,096,2045 6000 0 25,826 99,596 80,844 309,726 1,405,9306 1241 0 0 13,346 23,162 62,333 1,468,2637 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,2638 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,2669 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26610 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26611 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26612 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26613 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26614 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26615 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26616 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26617 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26618 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26619 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26620 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26621 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26622 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26623 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26624 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26625 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26626 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26627 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26628 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26629 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,26630 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,468,266Totals 25,528 428,310 542,969 312,134 184,853 1,468,266112
Page 1 and 2:
The Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve
Page 3 and 4:
AcknowledgementsWith Special Recogn
Page 5 and 6:
ContentsContents ..................
Page 7 and 8:
BIODIVERSITY SECTION ..............
Page 9 and 10:
GLOSSARY OF PROJECT SPECIFIC TERMSC
Page 11 and 12:
REDD, which is necessarily conserva
Page 13 and 14:
Rehabilitation Center (OFI), home t
Page 15 and 16:
estricted-‐range, or otherwise
Page 17 and 18:
HydrologyWatersheds in the Project
Page 19 and 20:
SoilA soil map for the Project Zone
Page 21 and 22:
ClimateRainfall in the Project Zone
Page 23 and 24:
Compositionally, freshwater swamps
Page 25 and 26:
selective logging, intensive loggin
Page 27 and 28:
G1.3. Boundaries of the Project Are
Page 29 and 30:
Communities in the Project ZoneThe
Page 31 and 32:
Delineation of the Project Zone. To
Page 33 and 34:
the project and recommending that t
Page 35 and 36:
During the ground surveys, aerial s
Page 37 and 38:
Stratification by Peat Distribution
Page 39 and 40:
G1.5. Description of Project Zone C
Page 41 and 42:
Only a few of the communities have
Page 43 and 44:
livelihoods, providing protection f
Page 45 and 46:
Similar to the other villages along
Page 47 and 48:
company. On average, farmers and fi
Page 49 and 50:
categories: housing, office, agricu
Page 51 and 52:
Table 6. Current Community Conflict
Page 53 and 54:
and six are Vulnerable (VU). CR spe
Page 55 and 56:
eight are listed as Vulnerable. Eig
Page 57 and 58:
2004). These losses highlight the i
Page 59 and 60:
small mammal species richness decli
Page 61 and 62:
even fewer forest species than plan
Page 63 and 64:
Other threats to biodiversityAdditi
Page 65 and 66:
HCV1.1Table 8. Preliminary evaluati
Page 67 and 68:
of water supplies and prevention of
Page 69 and 70: ladang agriculture, scrub, short se
Page 71 and 72: Table 11. Critically Endangered Hig
Page 73 and 74: d. areas that support significant c
Page 75 and 76: G1.8.2. Significant Large Landscape
Page 77 and 78: It is possible that a degree of per
Page 79 and 80: The revised Toolkit for Indonesia i
Page 81 and 82: the assessment area; and second, an
Page 83 and 84: HCV 4.3HCV 4.3 aims to identify and
Page 85 and 86: Within the Project Area and neighbo
Page 87 and 88: G1.8.6. Areas Critical for Traditio
Page 89 and 90: In 2004, five oil palm estates were
Page 91 and 92: Figure 23. Comparison of the new dr
Page 93 and 94: Table 15. Extent of Overlap w/ Oil
Page 95 and 96: Baseline analysis: LandcoverIn orde
Page 97 and 98: All survey data has been entered in
Page 99 and 100: For a complete report on the Carbon
Page 101 and 102: Identification of Baseline Scenario
Page 103 and 104: Under Indonesian legislation, Law (
Page 105 and 106: drained due to the realization that
Page 107 and 108: conversion for urban, rural, and in
Page 109 and 110: to 2002. Furthermore, deforestation
Page 111 and 112: Local Perspective. Tanjung Puting N
Page 113 and 114: Table 17. 2000-‐2008 Palm Oil E
Page 115 and 116: Provincial Government Targets Rimba
Page 117 and 118: to recovery from past disturbance,
Page 119: StratumTable 20. Calculations of CO
Page 123 and 124: GHG removals from oil palm sequestr
Page 125 and 126: Year ofProjectArea burnedyr-‐1T
Page 127 and 128: Year ofProjectArea burnedyr-‐1T
Page 129 and 130: Yr ofProjectTable 26. Net baseline
Page 131 and 132: environmental impacts and the need
Page 133 and 134: triggered by palm-‐oil companie
Page 135 and 136: G3. Project Design and GoalsG3.1. S
Page 137 and 138: elements and an assessment of the P
Page 139 and 140: habitat in terms of canopy and food
Page 141 and 142: Funding of OFI activitiesTanjung Pu
Page 143 and 144: interventions can improve the poor
Page 145 and 146: Community Agro-‐Forestry. In ke
Page 147 and 148: The only requirement is to pump the
Page 149 and 150: The Rimba Raya project proponents i
Page 151 and 152: www.kiva.org as highly reputable fi
Page 153 and 154: purchases more than $24 million dol
Page 155 and 156: The comparative analysis will be us
Page 157 and 158: G3.4. Project Lifetime, Accounting
Page 159 and 160: Table 28. Rimba Raya Implementation
Page 161 and 162: 2-‐Establishment ofRimba RayaRe
Page 163 and 164: 6-‐Development ofSocial Buffer2
Page 165 and 166: 7-‐Outreach andEducation3-‐
Page 167 and 168: Pembuang Hulu and Tanjung Hanau reg
Page 169 and 170: .7. Determination of the need for s
Page 171 and 172:
elationship with oil palm companies
Page 173 and 174:
capital.” In order to ensure that
Page 175 and 176:
G3.8. Stakeholder Identification an
Page 177 and 178:
2. Improve multi-‐stakeholder p
Page 179 and 180:
Community Involvement during Projec
Page 181 and 182:
31 26/12/08 Burhanudin Merchant Des
Page 183 and 184:
Table 31. Rimba Raya Project Proces
Page 185 and 186:
G3.9. CCBA Public Comment PeriodDes
Page 187 and 188:
In some contexts, for example where
Page 189 and 190:
Table 32. Required Skill Sets , Key
Page 191 and 192:
Develop areforestationprogramaround
Page 193 and 194:
Figure 38 PT Rimba Raya Conservatio
Page 195 and 196:
Figure 40. Project Organizational C
Page 197 and 198:
manipulated to serve someone’s pe
Page 199 and 200:
13). One area of special considerat
Page 201 and 202:
also provide training in the skills
Page 203 and 204:
Communitycenters &librariesWater fi
Page 205 and 206:
C102 - Social Security (Minimum Sta
Page 207 and 208:
G5.2. Documentation of Project Appr
Page 209 and 210:
Figure 42. Official Land Area Verif
Page 211 and 212:
Figure 44. Original Letter from Gov
Page 213 and 214:
Figure 45. Original Minister’s De
Page 215 and 216:
Encroachment by Palm Oil Plantation
Page 217 and 218:
CLIMATE SECTIONCL1. Net Positive Cl
Page 219 and 220:
CL1.5. Double Counting of Emissions
Page 221 and 222:
Negative leakage is the unanticipat
Page 223 and 224:
undervalued. Moreover, the argument
Page 225 and 226:
et. al., 2005). However the long te
Page 227 and 228:
edistributed such that the most eff
Page 229 and 230:
The intersection of the hypothetica
Page 231 and 232:
dedicated to bio-‐fuel producti
Page 233 and 234:
Without project activities are disp
Page 235 and 236:
Table 36. Assessment of risk factor
Page 237 and 238:
Table 36. ...continuedRiskFactorLik
Page 239 and 240:
Table 37. ...continuedRisk Factor %
Page 241 and 242:
degraded portions of the Project Ar
Page 243 and 244:
CL2.4. Leakage and non-CO2 GasesNon
Page 245 and 246:
Monitoring of the boundary of the p
Page 247 and 248:
Monitoring will be conducted by a p
Page 249 and 250:
Table 38. InfiniteSUSTAINABILITY Ma
Page 251 and 252:
Phinisi FloatingClinicMicro-Finance
Page 253 and 254:
Table 39. Threats and management re
Page 255 and 256:
Hunting - Communities in the Projec
Page 257 and 258:
All five of these capital assets ar
Page 259 and 260:
Hygiene improvesProportion of house
Page 261 and 262:
LARASITAProject proponents will wor
Page 263 and 264:
B1.2. Impact of Project Activities
Page 265 and 266:
HCV 1.1 Support Function to Protect
Page 267 and 268:
further losses. Protection of non-
Page 269 and 270:
five are listed as Endangered by IU
Page 271 and 272:
HCV 2.3 Areas that Contain Populati
Page 273 and 274:
Table 42. Species to be used for Ri
Page 275 and 276:
negative. In this scenario, net bio
Page 277 and 278:
permanent 10-‐20 km transects s
Page 279 and 280:
high resolution imagery) and field
Page 281 and 282:
e present in the Seruyan River insi
Page 283 and 284:
The Rimba Raya Project is located i
Page 285 and 286:
intentionally or unintentionally, f
Page 287 and 288:
GL3. Exceptional Biodiversity Benef
Page 289 and 290:
Table 44. Endangered & Critically E
Page 291 and 292:
GL3.2.2. Species with Large but Clu
Page 293 and 294:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAnderson, J.A.R. (1972)
Page 295 and 296:
Gibbs, H., (2008) Carbon payback ti
Page 297 and 298:
Nicolas, Marc V.J. and Grant S. Bee
Page 299 and 300:
Islands]. In Press.Susilo, H.D. (19
show all

The Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve REDD Project

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?