ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM - SGGW

More documents

Recommendations

Info

8 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskinumber of insured in SII in 2008 significantly exceeded the number of insured in ASIF(over nine times). In both systems, the number of pensions was lower than the number ofinsured persons. This situation should be regarded as favorable, because there are morecontributors than the recipients of benefits. However, it should be noted, that the ratioof the number of pensioners in relation to the number of insured persons in social insurancesystem amounted to 2.01, while in the case of benefits paid by ASIF, this factor wasequal to 1.07 (Table 1). A growing number of persons receiving agricultural pensions,with constant or declining number of paying the insurance premium will cause the pensionsystem of agricultural insurance to be more vulnerable to the reduction of revenuesfrom contributions.The provinces which stand out from others, as far as the average monthly number ofpensions from SII in 2008 is concerned, were: Śląskie and Mazowieckie. The numberof benefits in these regions was: 1127.7 thousand and 951.3 thousand appropriately, thatis over five times more than for example in Podlaskie (171.4 thousand). Also in thoseprovinces there were the highest number of insured persons. The lowest number of theaverage monthly number of pensions, workers’ pensions and the number of insured werecharacterizing such provinces as: Lubuskie, Opolskie and Podlaskie (Table 1).Average monthly number of pensions in total, paid by the Agricultural Social InsuranceFund in 2008 was 1477.7 thousand while the number of insured persons was 1574.4thousand (Table 1). The highest number of social security benefits from the agriculturalsocial insurance system was paid in provinces Mazowieckie and Lubelskie. These provinceswere also characterized by the highest number of insured (Table 1). Moreoverin such provinces as: Łódzkie, Małopolskie, Podlaskie and Wielkopolskie the averagemonthly number of pensions in the examined year exceeded 100 thousand. The lowestaverage monthly number of analyzed benefits and the number of insured were characterizingsuch regions as: Lubuskie, Opolskie and Zachodniopomorskie (Table 1).Analyzing the individual forms of social security benefits it is possible to concludethat in case of both social insurance system old-age pensions are the highest share of thewhole benefits. In turn survivor’s pensions, represented the smallest share. The attentionshould be paid to the fact that the survivor’s pensions from the agricultural insurance systemconstituted only 3.0% of the whole number of benefits, however that from SII – over17% (Figure 1). Such a large difference in the allocation of the survivors may be due tothe fact, that a large number of farmers also work outside agriculture, e.g. as a teachers,skilled workers or non-agricultural business owners. Such persons are normally subjectto social security insurance [Fedyszak-Radziejowska 2010]. Overload of professional responsibilities,poor working conditions are often conducive to cause an accident, diseasesand often death. Hence, in the case of the employee pension insurance, the share of paidsurvivors is higher than in that addressed to farmers agriculture. A small percentage ofsurvivors’ pensions paid under the Act on the social insurance for farmers may be alsocaused by relatively low age of farmers who apply for a pension.The average number of agricultural old-age pensions in total in 2008 was over fourtimes lover that the number of such pensions paid off from SII. In the case of disabilitypensions, ASIF paid over five time less that SII, whereas the survivors’ pensions – over29-times (Table 2).Acta Sci. Pol.
The distribution of social security payments among regions of Poland... 9%100,080,060,040,020,00,064.379.5Old -age pensions//Emertury18.6 17.517.1Disability pensions incase of inability to work//Renty z tytułuniezdolności do pracy3.0Survivor's pensions//Renty rodzinneSII /ZUSASIF/ KRUSFig. 1. The structure of social security benefits from SII and ASIF for 2008Rys. 1. Struktura świadczeń emerytalno-rentowych z ZUS i KRUS w 2008 rokuSource: Own elaboration based on Table 2.Źródło: Opracowanie własne na podstawie tabeli 2.The highest number of old-age pensions paid off by SII was noted in 2008 in Śląskie(723 thousand) and Mazowieckie (670 thousand). This follows the fact that both provincesbelong to the most populous regions in Poland (over 25% of the total populationof the country in 2008 came from these regions [Rocznik Satystyczny Województw2008]. In remaining provinces the number of old-age pensions from SII was fluctuatingbetween 118 thousand in Podlaskie and 407 thousand in Dolnośląskie. In 2008 thehighest number of old-age pensions from the agricultural social insurance system (onaverage above 100.0 thousand monthly) was paid in provinces: Mazowieckie, Lubelskieand Łódzkie. In turn the lowest number of old-age pensions paid from ASIF (below 30.0thousand) was registered in such provinces as: Lubuskie, Opolskie and Zachodniopomorskie(Table 2).In 2008 the highest number of disability pensions paid by SII was registered in suchprovinces as: Śląskie, Wielkopolskie, Mazowieckie, Małopolskie and Dolnośląskie. ProvincesOpolskie and Podlaskie indicated the lowest number of such benefits (below 30.0thousand). Then, in such provinces as Lubelskie and Mazowieckie average number ofagricultural disability pensions was exceeding 30.0 thousand. In turn, the average numberof such benefits was not higher than 5.0 thousand in Lubuskie and Opolskie (Table 2).The survivor’s pensions are benefits which have the smallest participation in thewhole number of social security benefits paid from Agricultural Social Insurance Fund.In 2008 the average monthly number of survivors’ pensions was fluctuating from0.1 thousand in Śląskie to 7.4 thousand in Mazowieckie. It is worth to notice that incase of survivors’ pensions paid off by SII, particularly in Śląskie the highest averagenumber of such benefits (218.5 thousand) was observed. Besides, in such provinces as:Dolnośląskie, Małopolskie, Mazowieckie and Wielkopolskie, number of workers’ survivors’pensions exceeded 100.0 thousand. The lowest number of survivors’ pensionsOeconomia 10 (1) 2011
Page 6 and 7: 6 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskicultu
Page 10 and 11: 10 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
Page 12: 12 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
Page 15 and 16: The distribution of social security
Page 17 and 18: %180,0160,0140,0120,0100,080,060,04
Page 19: The distribution of social security
Page 22 and 23: 22 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
Page 35 and 36: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 35-43EDUCATI
Page 37 and 38: Education as an element of competit
Page 43: Education as an element of competit
Page 46 and 47: 46 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
Page 58 and 59:
58 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesIn the West
Page 60 and 61:
60 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesThe most im
Page 62 and 63:
62 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesGDPt= GDP0+
Page 64 and 65:
64 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTHE TIME SE
Page 66 and 67:
66 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTable 4. Ac
Page 68 and 69:
68 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesNelson Ch.R
Page 70 and 71:
70 A. Ptak-Chmielewskastatistics, w
Page 72 and 73:
72 A. Ptak-Chmielewska3025birth rat
Page 74 and 75:
74 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaSECTOR OF ACT
Page 76 and 77:
76 A. Ptak-Chmielewskabirth rate fo
Page 78 and 79:
78 A. Ptak-Chmielewskawere trade fi
Page 80 and 81:
80 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaREFERENCESBal
Page 83 and 84:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 83-95THE EFF
Page 85 and 86:
The effi ciency of selected real es
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Table 1. Efficiency of real estate
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95:
Page 98 and 99:
98 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaJalin
Page 100 and 101:
100 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela2007
Page 102 and 103:
102 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
Page 104 and 105:
104 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
Page 106 and 107:
106 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela1400
Page 108 and 109:
108 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaOsek
Page 110 and 111:
110 E. SzymańskaProducts by Activi
Page 112 and 113:
112 E. Szymańskatroduced TFI which
Page 114 and 115:
114 E. Szymańskabers of companies
Page 116 and 117:
116 E. SzymańskaTable 3. Tourism v
Page 118 and 119:
118 E. SzymańskaREFERENCESCoccossi
Page 120 and 121:
120 J. WiśniewskaEvery society can
Page 122 and 123:
122 J. WiśniewskaStatistical analy
Page 124 and 125:
124 J. WiśniewskaCommon Agricultur
Page 126 and 127:
126 J. WiśniewskaTable 3. An attem
Page 128 and 129:
128 J. Wiśniewskathe application o
Page 130 and 131:
130 J. Wiśniewskainstitutional cos
Page 132 and 133:
132 J. Wiśniewskaemployed in agric
Page 134 and 135:
134 J. WiśniewskaLong term viabili
Page 136 and 137:
136 J. Wiśniewska--The level of re
Page 139 and 140:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 139-148INNOV
Page 141 and 142:
Innovativeness of food production e
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 149-158LOCAL
Page 151 and 152:
Local governance activities in supp
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 159-169CHANG
Page 161 and 162:
Changes in rural women’s movement
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169:
Page 172:
Ewa SzymańskaTourism function of M
show all

ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM - SGGW

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?