86 M. Renigier-Biłozor, R. WiśniewskiThe causes of anomalies on real estate markets differ from those encountered on othermarkets, including capital markets, due to the specific nature of real estates. The distributionof real estate prices shows an absence of linearity and the presence of anomalies thatdistort the classical equilibrium and affect the stability of the real estate market. If thosetwo assumptions are not met at the stage of preliminary analysis, the above leads to theformulation of incorrect conclusions, such as the overestimated value of coefficient R 2 .According to Peters [1997, following Pareto], a distribution has fatter tails (suggestingthe inefficiency of a market where prices do not follow random walks) when informationreaches the market irregularly or when the investors’ response to information is delayed.When the information flow exceeds critical values, investors respond to all informationthat had been previously ignored. This implies that, contrary to Newton’s theory whereevery action produces an instant response, market participants demonstrate a non-linearresponse to information.EFFICIENCY OF IMPERFECT REAL ESTATE MARKETSAccording to Kucharska-Stasiak [1999] and Bryx [2006], a perfect market has thefollowing attributes:– there is a large number of buyers and sellers – no participants have sufficient “marketpower” to set the price of a product, buyers and sellers have to be dispersed,– product homogeneity (uniformity and full substitution) – when products are homogenous,the decision to buy a given product will be determined by the price rather thanvariations in the product's nature,– perfect information (market transparency) – prices and quality of products are assumedto be known to all consumers and producers,– utility and profit maximization – in addition to maximizing their profits, decisionmakersalso attempt to maximize their security or significance,– zero entry or exit barriers – a competitive market is freely available to all participants,owners can move their capital to market segments generating higher revenues, thecapital market is marked by a high degree of liquidity.The following factors contribute to real estate market imperfections:a) speculation,b) monopolistic practices, such as the policies adopted by municipalities,c) large spread between prices quoted for similar real estates – the prices on local markets,in particular weakly developed markets, may differ even several-fold due to:– unavailability of information,– specific features of a transaction,– specific features of real estate,– financing method,– subjective evaluation of real estate's utilitarian value,– underestimation of prices in property deeds,d) low asset liquidity – real estate is difficult to sell at a price equal to its market value,e) sporadic market equilibrium – on the real estate market, supply and demand are usuallyout of balance due to:Acta Sci. Pol.
The effi ciency of selected real estate markets in Poland 87––––––market outlook,fluctuations in return rates,specificity of the local market,the return on alternative investments,situation on the construction market,state policy,frequent legislative changes,–f) small number of transactions – real estate is turnover is low,g) irrational behavior – buyers’ and sellers’ decisions are influenced by factors other thanthe price, including trends, neighborhood, tradition and advertising. Irrational behaviormay result from:–––subjective evaluation of real estate's utilitarian value,unequal access to market information,mutual dependencies between parties,acting under coercion,–h) insufficient information,i) differences in interpreting data.According to the authors, the inefficiency of real estate markets results from a smallnumber of transactions and the unavailability of vital information about the transactionand its parties. Such information is difficult to accumulate without database systems. It isalso difficult to interpret without extensive analyses of functional dependencies betweenvarious attributes of real estate. The determination of the effect that real estate attributeshave on a selected decision (e.g. price) may also prove problematic.From a different perspective, the ineffectiveness of the Polish real estate market hasa number of positive outcomes, including above average profits and rates of return onreal estate investments. Transactions usually entail the conviction that real estate is worthmore than the price paid upon acquisition and that is worth less that the price paid uponsale. High profits and high rates of return on real estate investments would be very difficultto achieve on an effective market.The discussed attributes of a perfect market affect the efficiency of the real estate market.Each characteristic applies both on the macro (market) and micro (participants) scale.This is not to imply, however, that those attributes deliver similar effects. Their outcomesare evaluated from different perspectives.The efficiency of the real estate market is inseparable from the efficiency of its participantswho are the market’s driving force and the final decision-makers. In broad terms,the efficiency of market participants is determined by their ability to achieve specificgoals through the maximum use of the available information. Efficiency is measured interms of the outcomes of their actions, and it is determined by the relationship betweenthe borne outlays and the achieved results, but on the real estate market, those goals arenot always optimal from the economic point of view.The efficiency of the real estate market is the individual participant’s ability toachieve the set goals, while market effectiveness is level of development or goal attainmentin a complex social and economic system, such as the real estate market. Thispaper attempts to define the factors that determine the efficiency and, consequently, theeffectiveness of the real estate market.Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011
- Page 6 and 7:
6 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskicultu
- Page 8 and 9:
8 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskinumbe
- Page 10 and 11:
10 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
- Page 12:
12 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
- Page 15 and 16:
The distribution of social security
- Page 17 and 18:
%180,0160,0140,0120,0100,080,060,04
- Page 19:
The distribution of social security
- Page 22 and 23:
22 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 24 and 25:
24 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 26 and 27:
26 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 28 and 29:
28 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 30 and 31:
30 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 32 and 33:
32 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 35 and 36: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 35-43EDUCATI
- Page 37 and 38: Education as an element of competit
- Page 39 and 40: Education as an element of competit
- Page 41 and 42: Education as an element of competit
- Page 43: Education as an element of competit
- Page 46 and 47: 46 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 48 and 49: 48 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 50 and 51: 50 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 52 and 53: 52 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 54 and 55: 54 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 56 and 57: 56 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 58 and 59: 58 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesIn the West
- Page 60 and 61: 60 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesThe most im
- Page 62 and 63: 62 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesGDPt= GDP0+
- Page 64 and 65: 64 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTHE TIME SE
- Page 66 and 67: 66 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTable 4. Ac
- Page 68 and 69: 68 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesNelson Ch.R
- Page 70 and 71: 70 A. Ptak-Chmielewskastatistics, w
- Page 72 and 73: 72 A. Ptak-Chmielewska3025birth rat
- Page 74 and 75: 74 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaSECTOR OF ACT
- Page 76 and 77: 76 A. Ptak-Chmielewskabirth rate fo
- Page 78 and 79: 78 A. Ptak-Chmielewskawere trade fi
- Page 80 and 81: 80 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaREFERENCESBal
- Page 83 and 84: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 83-95THE EFF
- Page 85: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 89 and 90: Table 1. Efficiency of real estate
- Page 91 and 92: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 93 and 94: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 95: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 98 and 99: 98 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaJalin
- Page 100 and 101: 100 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela2007
- Page 102 and 103: 102 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
- Page 104 and 105: 104 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
- Page 106 and 107: 106 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela1400
- Page 108 and 109: 108 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaOsek
- Page 110 and 111: 110 E. SzymańskaProducts by Activi
- Page 112 and 113: 112 E. Szymańskatroduced TFI which
- Page 114 and 115: 114 E. Szymańskabers of companies
- Page 116 and 117: 116 E. SzymańskaTable 3. Tourism v
- Page 118 and 119: 118 E. SzymańskaREFERENCESCoccossi
- Page 120 and 121: 120 J. WiśniewskaEvery society can
- Page 122 and 123: 122 J. WiśniewskaStatistical analy
- Page 124 and 125: 124 J. WiśniewskaCommon Agricultur
- Page 126 and 127: 126 J. WiśniewskaTable 3. An attem
- Page 128 and 129: 128 J. Wiśniewskathe application o
- Page 130 and 131: 130 J. Wiśniewskainstitutional cos
- Page 132 and 133: 132 J. Wiśniewskaemployed in agric
- Page 134 and 135: 134 J. WiśniewskaLong term viabili
- Page 136 and 137:
136 J. Wiśniewska--The level of re
- Page 139 and 140:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 139-148INNOV
- Page 141 and 142:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 143 and 144:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 145 and 146:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 147 and 148:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 149 and 150:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 149-158LOCAL
- Page 151 and 152:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 153 and 154:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 155 and 156:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 157 and 158:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 159 and 160:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 159-169CHANG
- Page 161 and 162:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 163 and 164:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 165 and 166:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 167 and 168:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 169:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 172:
Ewa SzymańskaTourism function of M