56 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Raggi, D. ViaggiZRÓŻNICOWANIE MOŻLIWYCH REAKCJI ROLNIKÓW Z WYBRANYCHREGIONÓW UE NA ZMIANY WPRStreszczenie. Celem opracowania jest przedstawienie wyników analizy możliwych reakcjirolników na różne scenariusze wspólnej polityki rolnej. Deklaracje rolników dotyczącekontynuacji prowadzenia gospodarstwa i decyzji co do zmian w poziomie intensywnościprodukcji były zasadniczym przedmiotem badań. Badania przeprowadzono w wybranychregionach z kilku krajów UE w ramach projektu CAP-IRE. Dane zgromadzoną drogą wywiaduz rolnikami z wykorzystaniem kwestionariusza wywiadu. Uwzględniono dwa hipotetycznescenariusze polityki rolnej: Baseline, w którym założono kontynuację obecnejWPR, oraz Liberalny, w którym przyjęto wycofanie wszelkich form subsydiowania sektorarolnictwa. Test McNermana był głównym narzędziem statystycznym zastosowanymw analizie. Badania wykazały znaczące zróżnicowanie reakcji rolników w regionach UEreprezentowanych w projekcie. Przeciętnie, w całej zbiorowości przeważali rolnicy deklarującyzaprzestanie prowadzenia gospodarstw i wykazujący wieksze zainteresowaniedziałalnościami pozarolniczymi w warunkach scenariusza liberalnego, w porównaniu doscenariusza Baseline.Słowa kluczowe: wspólna polityka rolna, scenariusze WPR, kontynuacja gospodarowania,reakcja na zmiany WPRAccepted for print – Zaakceptowano do druku 17.02.2011Acta Sci. Pol.
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 57–68ECONOMIC POLICY IN CENTRAL EASTERN EUROPE:UNIT ROOT CONSEQUENCESLukas Mazal, Kevin J. RowlesUniversity of Huddersfield, UKAbstract. This article aims to provide an econometric justification for economic policy inthe Central and Eastern European area by examining the stability of real GDP and industrialproduction in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, and Hungary. Stability of GDP andindustrial production is examined by unit root tests. The Dickey-Fuller (1979) unit roottest indicates unit root in case of all four outputs. In case of the industrial production, theresults are mixed. Nonetheless, difference stationarity of the GDP implies that there is nodeterministic time trend in GDP. Therefore, there is no short-run trend reversion. Deep andlong recessions are not only possible but also even likely. Thus, actions of economic policycan be regarded as justified because they are desirable to boost economy in order to reversethese recessions. This study can also be regarded as an extension of unit root tests to thepost communist countries.Key words: Central Eastern Europe, Classical Economics, Keynesianism, Stability of output,Unit rootINTRODUCTIONThe end of the Second World War in 1945 marked the beginning of more than fortyyears during which the European continent was divided by the ‘Iron Curtain’ and the twoparts progressed along different paths. Politically, economically, socially, and culturally,there seemed to be little to unite the divided Europe. However, in one area at least thereappeared to be a common development, namely the emergence of the state as the majoreconomic decision-maker in society. In Central Europe, the role of the state was determinedby socialist principles. Socialism required the state to own the means of productionand this would enable the authorities to develop the system of central planning. Withina few years of the emergence of Soviet hegemony, the socialist states had appropriatedthe means of production. There were some exceptions such as the development of Polishagriculture outside the collectives and limited private enterprise was tolerated in Hungaryafter the 1960s.Corresponding author – Adres do korespondencji: Lukas Mazal, e-mail: lucas.mazal@googlemail.com; Kevin J. Rowles, k.j.rowles@hud.ac.uk
- Page 6 and 7: 6 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskicultu
- Page 8 and 9: 8 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskinumbe
- Page 10 and 11: 10 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
- Page 12: 12 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
- Page 15 and 16: The distribution of social security
- Page 17 and 18: %180,0160,0140,0120,0100,080,060,04
- Page 19: The distribution of social security
- Page 22 and 23: 22 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 24 and 25: 24 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 26 and 27: 26 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 28 and 29: 28 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 30 and 31: 30 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 32 and 33: 32 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 35 and 36: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 35-43EDUCATI
- Page 37 and 38: Education as an element of competit
- Page 39 and 40: Education as an element of competit
- Page 41 and 42: Education as an element of competit
- Page 43: Education as an element of competit
- Page 46 and 47: 46 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 48 and 49: 48 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 50 and 51: 50 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 52 and 53: 52 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 54 and 55: 54 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 58 and 59: 58 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesIn the West
- Page 60 and 61: 60 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesThe most im
- Page 62 and 63: 62 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesGDPt= GDP0+
- Page 64 and 65: 64 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTHE TIME SE
- Page 66 and 67: 66 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTable 4. Ac
- Page 68 and 69: 68 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesNelson Ch.R
- Page 70 and 71: 70 A. Ptak-Chmielewskastatistics, w
- Page 72 and 73: 72 A. Ptak-Chmielewska3025birth rat
- Page 74 and 75: 74 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaSECTOR OF ACT
- Page 76 and 77: 76 A. Ptak-Chmielewskabirth rate fo
- Page 78 and 79: 78 A. Ptak-Chmielewskawere trade fi
- Page 80 and 81: 80 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaREFERENCESBal
- Page 83 and 84: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 83-95THE EFF
- Page 85 and 86: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 87 and 88: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 89 and 90: Table 1. Efficiency of real estate
- Page 91 and 92: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 93 and 94: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 95: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 98 and 99: 98 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaJalin
- Page 100 and 101: 100 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela2007
- Page 102 and 103: 102 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
- Page 104 and 105: 104 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
- Page 106 and 107:
106 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela1400
- Page 108 and 109:
108 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaOsek
- Page 110 and 111:
110 E. SzymańskaProducts by Activi
- Page 112 and 113:
112 E. Szymańskatroduced TFI which
- Page 114 and 115:
114 E. Szymańskabers of companies
- Page 116 and 117:
116 E. SzymańskaTable 3. Tourism v
- Page 118 and 119:
118 E. SzymańskaREFERENCESCoccossi
- Page 120 and 121:
120 J. WiśniewskaEvery society can
- Page 122 and 123:
122 J. WiśniewskaStatistical analy
- Page 124 and 125:
124 J. WiśniewskaCommon Agricultur
- Page 126 and 127:
126 J. WiśniewskaTable 3. An attem
- Page 128 and 129:
128 J. Wiśniewskathe application o
- Page 130 and 131:
130 J. Wiśniewskainstitutional cos
- Page 132 and 133:
132 J. Wiśniewskaemployed in agric
- Page 134 and 135:
134 J. WiśniewskaLong term viabili
- Page 136 and 137:
136 J. Wiśniewska--The level of re
- Page 139 and 140:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 139-148INNOV
- Page 141 and 142:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 143 and 144:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 145 and 146:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 147 and 148:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 149 and 150:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 149-158LOCAL
- Page 151 and 152:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 153 and 154:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 155 and 156:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 157 and 158:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 159 and 160:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 159-169CHANG
- Page 161 and 162:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 163 and 164:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 165 and 166:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 167 and 168:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 169:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 172:
Ewa SzymańskaTourism function of M