32 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Gozdowski, B. Roszkowska-MądraIraizoz B., Gorton M., Davidova S. 2007. Segmenting farms for analysis agricultural trajectories:A case study of the Navarra region in Spain. Agricultural Systems 93, 143–169.Köbrich C., Rehman T., Khan M., 2003. Typification of farming systems for constructing representativefarm models: two illustrations of the application of multi-variate analyses in Chileand Pakistan. Agricultural Systems 76, 141–157.Kostrowicki J. 1977. Agricultural typology concept and method. Agricultural Systems 2, 33–45.Kristensen S.P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of landscape changes and farm characteristics in a studyarea in central Jutland, Denmark. Ecological Modelling 168, 303–318.Krzanowski W. 2000. Principles of multivariate analysis. Analysis: A user’s perspective. UniversityPress, Oxford.Landais E. 1998. Modelling farm diversity: new approaches to typology building in France. AgriculturalSystems 58, 505–527.MacDonald D., Crabtree J.R., Wiesinger G., Dax T., Stamou N., Fleury P., Gutierrez Lazpita J.,Gibon A. 2000. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmentalconsequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management 59, 47–69.Mądry W., Gozdowski D., Roszkowska-Mądra B., Dąbrowski M., Lupa W. 2010. Diversity andtypology of farms according to farming system: a case study for a dairy region of Podlasieprovince, Poland. Electr. J. Polish Agric. Univ. Economics, Vol. 13 Issue 2.Milan M.J., Arnalte E., Caja G., 2003. Economic profitability and typology of Ripollesa breedsheep farms in Spain. Small Ruminant Res. 49, 97–105.Pardos L., Maza M.T., Fantova E., Sepulveda W., 2008. The diversity of sheep production systemsin Aragon (Spain): characterisation and typification of meat sheep farms. Span. J. Agric.Res. 6, 497–507.Paul C.J.M., Nehring R. 2005. Product diversification, production systems, and economic performancein U.S. agricultural production. J. Econometrics 126, 525–548.Roszkowska-Mądra B. 2010. Obszary wiejskie o niekorzystnych warunkach gospodarowaniaw aspekcie ich zrównoważonego rozwoju. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.Ruiz F.A., Mena Y., Castel J.M., Guinamard C., Bossis N., Caramelle-Holtz E., Contu M., SitziaM., Fois N. 2009. Dairy goat grazing systems in Mediterranean regions: A comparativeanalysis in Spain, France and Italy. Small Rumin. Res. 85, 42–49.Sang N., Birnie R. 2008. Spatial sampling and public opinion in environmental management:A case study of the Ythan catchment. Land Use Policy 25, 30–42.Serrano Martínez E., Lavín González P., Giráldez García F. J., Bernués Jal A. Ruiz Mantecón A.2004a. Classification variables of cattle farms in the mountains of León, Spain. SpanishJ. Agric. Res. 2, 50–511.Serrano Martínez E., Giráldez García F. J., Lavín González P., Bernués Jal A. Ruiz Mantecón A.2004b. The identification of homogeneous groups of cattle farms in the mountains ofLeón, Spain. Spanish J. Agric. Res. 2, 512–523.Thapa G.B., Rasul G., 2005. Patterns and determinants of agricultural systems in the ChittagongHill Tracts of Bangladesh. Agric. Syst. 84, 255–277.Tittonell P., Vanlauwe B., Leffelaar P.A., Rowe E.C., Giller K.E. 2005. Exploring diversity in soilfertility management of smallholder farms in western Kenya: I. Heterogeneity at regionand farm scale. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 110, 149–165.Warner K.E. 2000. The economics of tobacco: myths and realities. Tobacco Control 9, 78–89.Wilkinson W.C., Fisher L.R., Smith W.D., Jordan D.L. 2007. Effects of stand loss, planting date,and replanting method on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Tobacco Science 47,44–52.Zawadka J. 2010. Evolution of agritouristic activity in Poland and typology of rural tourism farms(in Polish). Acta Sci. Pol. Oeconomia 9, 627–638.Acta Sci. Pol.
Typology of tobacco-based farming systems at the farm level in south-eastern Poland 33TYPOLOGIA SYSTEMÓW PRODUKCJI ROLNICZEJW GOSPODARSTWACH ZAJMUJĄCYCH SIĘ UPRAWĄ TYTONIUW POŁUDNIOWO-WSCHODNIEJ POLSCEStreszczenie. Celem niniejszej pracy jest analiza zróżnicowania systemów produkcji w gospodarstwachzajmujących się uprawą tytoniu w południowo-wschodniej Polsce. Badaniaankietowe wykonano w 151 gospodarstwach, znajdujących się w województwach: lubelskim,podkarpackim i mazowieckim. Wielowymiarową ocenę zróżnicowania gospodarstwi ich grupowanie (typologię) wykonano za pomocą analizy składowych głównych (PCA)i analizy skupień metodą Warda na pięciu pierwszych składowych głównych. Wydzielono5 jednorodnych grup gospodarstw tytoniowych, odzwierciadlających odpowiednie typyprodukcji rolniczej w tych gospodarstwach na badanym obszarze, które były zróżnicowanegłównie pod względem powierzchni, wykorzystania nowych technologii produkcji,pogłowia bydła, nawożenia i udziału produkcji tytoniu w dochodach gospodarstw.Słowa kluczowe: tytoń, typologia gospodarstw, analiza składowych głównych, analizaskupieńAccepted for print – Zaakceptowano do druku 20.02.2011Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011
- Page 6 and 7: 6 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskicultu
- Page 8 and 9: 8 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskinumbe
- Page 10 and 11: 10 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
- Page 12: 12 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
- Page 15 and 16: The distribution of social security
- Page 17 and 18: %180,0160,0140,0120,0100,080,060,04
- Page 19: The distribution of social security
- Page 22 and 23: 22 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 24 and 25: 24 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 26 and 27: 26 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 28 and 29: 28 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 30 and 31: 30 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 35 and 36: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 35-43EDUCATI
- Page 37 and 38: Education as an element of competit
- Page 39 and 40: Education as an element of competit
- Page 41 and 42: Education as an element of competit
- Page 43: Education as an element of competit
- Page 46 and 47: 46 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 48 and 49: 48 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 50 and 51: 50 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 52 and 53: 52 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 54 and 55: 54 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 56 and 57: 56 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 58 and 59: 58 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesIn the West
- Page 60 and 61: 60 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesThe most im
- Page 62 and 63: 62 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesGDPt= GDP0+
- Page 64 and 65: 64 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTHE TIME SE
- Page 66 and 67: 66 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTable 4. Ac
- Page 68 and 69: 68 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesNelson Ch.R
- Page 70 and 71: 70 A. Ptak-Chmielewskastatistics, w
- Page 72 and 73: 72 A. Ptak-Chmielewska3025birth rat
- Page 74 and 75: 74 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaSECTOR OF ACT
- Page 76 and 77: 76 A. Ptak-Chmielewskabirth rate fo
- Page 78 and 79: 78 A. Ptak-Chmielewskawere trade fi
- Page 80 and 81: 80 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaREFERENCESBal
- Page 83 and 84:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 83-95THE EFF
- Page 85 and 86:
The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 87 and 88:
The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 89 and 90:
Table 1. Efficiency of real estate
- Page 91 and 92:
The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 93 and 94:
The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 95:
The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 98 and 99:
98 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaJalin
- Page 100 and 101:
100 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela2007
- Page 102 and 103:
102 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
- Page 104 and 105:
104 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
- Page 106 and 107:
106 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela1400
- Page 108 and 109:
108 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaOsek
- Page 110 and 111:
110 E. SzymańskaProducts by Activi
- Page 112 and 113:
112 E. Szymańskatroduced TFI which
- Page 114 and 115:
114 E. Szymańskabers of companies
- Page 116 and 117:
116 E. SzymańskaTable 3. Tourism v
- Page 118 and 119:
118 E. SzymańskaREFERENCESCoccossi
- Page 120 and 121:
120 J. WiśniewskaEvery society can
- Page 122 and 123:
122 J. WiśniewskaStatistical analy
- Page 124 and 125:
124 J. WiśniewskaCommon Agricultur
- Page 126 and 127:
126 J. WiśniewskaTable 3. An attem
- Page 128 and 129:
128 J. Wiśniewskathe application o
- Page 130 and 131:
130 J. Wiśniewskainstitutional cos
- Page 132 and 133:
132 J. Wiśniewskaemployed in agric
- Page 134 and 135:
134 J. WiśniewskaLong term viabili
- Page 136 and 137:
136 J. Wiśniewska--The level of re
- Page 139 and 140:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 139-148INNOV
- Page 141 and 142:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 143 and 144:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 145 and 146:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 147 and 148:
Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 149 and 150:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 149-158LOCAL
- Page 151 and 152:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 153 and 154:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 155 and 156:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 157 and 158:
Local governance activities in supp
- Page 159 and 160:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 159-169CHANG
- Page 161 and 162:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 163 and 164:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 165 and 166:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 167 and 168:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 169:
Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 172:
Ewa SzymańskaTourism function of M