130 J. Wiśniewskainstitutional costs paid by the taxpayer. Not only does it include accounting costs, butalso broadly understood economic costs, implicit and explicit. Farms create a structurallydiversified group of economic subjects, locally determined by a given social and economicenvironment, directions of production, scale of resources, production specialisationof farms and other features grouping this sort of economic subjects [Income 1985].Scientific analysis of incomes therefore requires a statistical description of the strengthof the connection and the kind of relation between the factors determining the quantity ofproduction and the level of incomes.The issue of equality in economic sciences relates to the theory of income distribution.Economic policy differentiates between vertical equity and horizontal equity as the rulesdetermining the tax policy. On the other hand, the pay policy may be subject to the rule ofequal pay, which assumes that for doing any kind of job, the pay a person receives shouldbe independent from the tender, race, sex or any other features of the person doing thejob. The idea of justice is used with reference to the division in welfare economy. It meansequality in the sense that everybody should receive what they deserve or the expectationsshall remain unsatisfied. The issue of equality in economic sciences relates to the theoryof income distribution. Economic policy differentiates between vertical equity and horizontalequity as the rules determining the tax policy [Black 2008].As far as inequality of incomes are concerned, they can be understood as the differencesbetween particular people, families, groups of people, regions or states. A highdiversity of incomes preserves the diversified division of wealth in society. Income discrepanciesbetween regions and countries result from different opportunities to earn anddifferent capital resources. The problems of income disparity are connected with exploringthe differences between economic subjects, including households. It is set in the contextof social and economic research. In hitherto analyses, the most frequent comparisonsincluded average incomes, defined for particular social and professional groups. Theoutcomes allow to draw conclusions with respect to average economic inequalities andsocial inequalities in households.One of the directions of research on income discrepancies is measuring the distributionof income in a particular group of economic subjects creating national or internationaleconomy. Comparing absolute and relative changes in the level of incomes obtainedin particular groups of economic subjects, e.g. in the arrangement of demographical features.The statistical analysis of profitability uses the measurements of variation in orderto define their deviation from the average value and the measurements of asymmetry, inorder to define the degree and direction of irregularity and the measurements of concentration,similarity and the diversity of structures [Sobczyk 2010].The division of incomes shows how numerous the groups of subjects in particularincome ranges are and the distribution of incomes shows the differences between the averageand the lowest income level in a following group. The spatial diversity of incomes,in turn, requires a summary statistical analysis. The most frequently used statistical methodsinclude: the Lorenz Curve, Florence Coefficient, Pearson Coefficient and Gini Coefficientas well as Sen Index. The profitability analysis often includes the research oftheir dynamic variation by means of defining the function of average periodical rate ofchanges and developmental tendencies or absolute changes, including both nominal andreal changes, e.g. by comparing the parities of purchasing power.Acta Sci. Pol.
Economic sustainability of agriculture – conceptions and indicators 131The specificity of the income from farming consists in the fact that it constitutes earningson the engaged production factors in the farming production, i.e. land, capital andfarmers’ labour, as well as it compensates organisational and managerial efforts and riskbonus in case of farmers. Another important function of the income from farming is servingconsumption purposes of households and, simultaneously, serving production andinvestment processes of farms. The issue of incomes from farming needs to be consideredbasing on two categories of these incomes, i.e. incomes from farming and personalincomes. The first one is particularly important in the context of developmental needs ofa farm, the latter – in the context of consumption needs of a family of farmers’. What isspecific for a farm is that the two categories of incomes cannot be discriminated betweena priori [Zegar 2005].The character of a farm constitutes a problem in the statistics of incomes and in the implementationof comparative research concerning income discrepancies in the economy.The income of a farming household is included in the statistical research of householdbudgets. Disposable income can then serve as a measurement of a household income. Atthe same time, the income of a farming household is defined by the added value or thefarming income. Comparative analyses require a proper description of the range of databeing compared and their representativeness for the kept statements. The issue of representativenessof empirical data remains a considerable hindrance, impeding the researchon profitability, as in the case of farms, the data is gathered for those farms which approachcertain economic results and keep an accounts register.To sum up, to evaluate the economic sustainability the issue of incomes can be examinedwith reference to a professional group or a social group. Sociological researchdeals with the problem in a broad sense of relations between the city and the countryside,and hence, rural areas become the area of comparison for urban areas. Such spatialrange of research has been dealt with by different regional studies. One of the issues isthe differentiation of municipal and rural households, resulting from the dissimilarity ofincome sources. Such research context enables to analyse the structure of income creation[Leszczyńska 2007]. In addition to income indicators the quantification of environmentaleffects remains of major importance. Similarly to the indices measuring the effectiveness,the indices measuring environmental efficiency also have to take into account regionaldifferences appearing in the economy and in natural environmental conditions.INCOME PARITY IN SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTUREThe inequality of the income distribution within agriculture may be as wide as thatwithin non-agricultural sector but not wider [Kuznets 1955]. The sustainable agriculturein the sustainable economy is constituted by the income parity. An American encyclopaediaof social sciences explains the notion of ‘parity’ in the section devoted to agriculture,subsection ‘income and pricing policy’. The entry mentions ‘parity price’. The term isactually an attempt at defining an objective criterion of the policy of price support inagriculture. It is the price of agricultural products ensuring a purchasing power, concerningconsumption and production products and services, equal to that of previous periods[Sills 1968]. The parity price is to ensure proper salary and living conditions to farmersOeconomia 10 (1) 2011
- Page 6 and 7:
6 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskicultu
- Page 8 and 9:
8 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskinumbe
- Page 10 and 11:
10 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
- Page 12:
12 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
- Page 15 and 16:
The distribution of social security
- Page 17 and 18:
%180,0160,0140,0120,0100,080,060,04
- Page 19:
The distribution of social security
- Page 22 and 23:
22 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 24 and 25:
24 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 26 and 27:
26 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 28 and 29:
28 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 30 and 31:
30 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 32 and 33:
32 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
- Page 35 and 36:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 35-43EDUCATI
- Page 37 and 38:
Education as an element of competit
- Page 39 and 40:
Education as an element of competit
- Page 41 and 42:
Education as an element of competit
- Page 43:
Education as an element of competit
- Page 46 and 47:
46 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 48 and 49:
48 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 50 and 51:
50 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 52 and 53:
52 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 54 and 55:
54 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 56 and 57:
56 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
- Page 58 and 59:
58 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesIn the West
- Page 60 and 61:
60 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesThe most im
- Page 62 and 63:
62 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesGDPt= GDP0+
- Page 64 and 65:
64 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTHE TIME SE
- Page 66 and 67:
66 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTable 4. Ac
- Page 68 and 69:
68 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesNelson Ch.R
- Page 70 and 71:
70 A. Ptak-Chmielewskastatistics, w
- Page 72 and 73:
72 A. Ptak-Chmielewska3025birth rat
- Page 74 and 75:
74 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaSECTOR OF ACT
- Page 76 and 77:
76 A. Ptak-Chmielewskabirth rate fo
- Page 78 and 79:
78 A. Ptak-Chmielewskawere trade fi
- Page 80 and 81: 80 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaREFERENCESBal
- Page 83 and 84: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 83-95THE EFF
- Page 85 and 86: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 87 and 88: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 89 and 90: Table 1. Efficiency of real estate
- Page 91 and 92: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 93 and 94: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 95: The effi ciency of selected real es
- Page 98 and 99: 98 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaJalin
- Page 100 and 101: 100 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela2007
- Page 102 and 103: 102 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
- Page 104 and 105: 104 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
- Page 106 and 107: 106 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela1400
- Page 108 and 109: 108 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaOsek
- Page 110 and 111: 110 E. SzymańskaProducts by Activi
- Page 112 and 113: 112 E. Szymańskatroduced TFI which
- Page 114 and 115: 114 E. Szymańskabers of companies
- Page 116 and 117: 116 E. SzymańskaTable 3. Tourism v
- Page 118 and 119: 118 E. SzymańskaREFERENCESCoccossi
- Page 120 and 121: 120 J. WiśniewskaEvery society can
- Page 122 and 123: 122 J. WiśniewskaStatistical analy
- Page 124 and 125: 124 J. WiśniewskaCommon Agricultur
- Page 126 and 127: 126 J. WiśniewskaTable 3. An attem
- Page 128 and 129: 128 J. Wiśniewskathe application o
- Page 132 and 133: 132 J. Wiśniewskaemployed in agric
- Page 134 and 135: 134 J. WiśniewskaLong term viabili
- Page 136 and 137: 136 J. Wiśniewska--The level of re
- Page 139 and 140: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 139-148INNOV
- Page 141 and 142: Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 143 and 144: Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 145 and 146: Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 147 and 148: Innovativeness of food production e
- Page 149 and 150: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 149-158LOCAL
- Page 151 and 152: Local governance activities in supp
- Page 153 and 154: Local governance activities in supp
- Page 155 and 156: Local governance activities in supp
- Page 157 and 158: Local governance activities in supp
- Page 159 and 160: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 159-169CHANG
- Page 161 and 162: Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 163 and 164: Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 165 and 166: Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 167 and 168: Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 169: Changes in rural women’s movement
- Page 172: Ewa SzymańskaTourism function of M