ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM - SGGW

More documents

Recommendations

Info

104 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTable 2. Economic indicators of touristic activities in the region of Siedlce (means from farms andyears 2006–2007)Tabela 2. Parametry ekonomiczne działalności agroturystycznej w regionie siedleckim (średniaz gospodarstw i lat 2006–2007)CountySpecificationsokołowskisiedleckiwęgrowskiłosickimińskigarwolińskiMeanfor theregionDirect cost Catering 1064.45 978.18 667.58 1148.82 1137.93 1096.62 1015.59of services[PLN] Accommodation 1947.88 1875.76 1426.94 1941.06 1830.86 1773.32 1799.20The direct costof the tourist visit [PLN]3012.34 2853.94 2094.52 3056.63 2968.80 2869.94 2809.36Price of Catering 32.40 35.72 23.58 31.83 37.25 27.50 31.38service[PLN] Accommodation 24.60 28.77 21.41 28.16 35.12 27.50 27.58Number of units sold [pc] 173.08 159.00 123.07 166.30 185.03 178.31 164.13Direct Catering 5576.12 5699.80 2906.36 5319.50 6922.80 4861.06 5214.27revenue[PLN] Accommodation 4300.01 4557.18 2631.90 4660.50 6490.92 4921.12 4593.60Total direct income [PLN] 9876.13 10245.38 5538.30 9980.00 13413.72 9782.18 9807.87Direct Catering 4511.66 4723.83 2238.77 4203.93 5784.96 3744.44 4198.68surplus[PLN] Accommodation 2352.12 2681.42 1204.94 2719.44 4659.97 3147.80 2794.40Total Direct surplus [PLN] 6865.29 7404.94 3442.77 6923.37 10444.93 6912.24 6993.08Source: Authors’ research.Źródło: Badania własne.Table 3. Analysis of income from touristic activities in the examined farms compared with thesupply and demandTabela 3. Analiza przychodu z działalności agroturystycznej w badanych gospodarstwach na tlepopytu i podażyAnalysis of income compared with the supplyAnalysis of income compared with the demandRatingCountyYield[PLN]RatingCountyPOR[PLN]1 miński 206 1 miński 722 garwoliński 141 2 siedlecki 643 sokołowski 91 3 łosicki 604 siedlecki 84 4 sokołowski 575 łosicki 66 5 garwoliński 546 węgrowski 34 6 węgrowski 45Region 14 Region 59Source: Authors’ research.Źródło: Badania własne.Acta Sci. Pol.
Financial result analysis of agrotouristic farms activities in siedlce region 105agrotourist service in relation to the existing demand in the market (the proper size ofaccommodation corresponding to natural attractiveness of the area). On the other hand,Węgrów District is an example of a market, where there was a significant overestimate ofaccommodation facilities in relation to the demand. Hence the revenue per available bed(34 PLN) was lower than the value of income attributable to one sold bed (45 PLN).A reliable financial result of agritourist activities is the direct surplus, calculated as thedifference between revenues and direct costs. Analysing the value of this surplus, one canobserve significant differences (Table 2). Farmers from Mińsk District earned the most(10,444.93 PLN), while in Węgrów the least (3442.77 PLN). The average direct surplusof 6993.08 PLN was obtained in the region of Siedlce in 2006–2007.The value of direct surplus from tourist services offered by the surveyed households, byfar, depended on the number of services sold and their prices. In turn, the demand for touristservices presented as an indicator of the average number of overnight stays during the yearwas also dependent, as indicated by the statistical analysis, on the attractiveness of the naturalterrain. Indeed, a positive correlation of these features (Figure 5), largely determined therelationship between the value of the direct surplus and the value of rural recreational spaceIndicator of the average numbers of accommodation [No]Fig. 5.Rys. 5.Source:Źródło:160140120100806040Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011y = 0,039+ + 0,010 ·* xR 2 = 74%95% confidence interval200 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Value of indicator ofrecreational farms space [points]The indicator of the average number of sold accommodation in the touristic farms in theregion of Siedlce (per year) depending on the values of rural recreational spaceWskaźnik przeciętnej liczby udzielonych noclegów w gospodarstwach agroturystycznychregionu siedleckiego (w ciągu roku) w zależności od wartości wskaźnika wiejskiejprzestrzeni rekreacyjnejAuthors’ research.Badania własne.
Page 6 and 7:
6 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskicultu
Page 8 and 9:
8 A. Gawrońska, S. Paszkowskinumbe
Page 10 and 11:
10 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
Page 12:
12 A. Gawrońska, S. PaszkowskiTabl
Page 15 and 16:
The distribution of social security
Page 17 and 18:
%180,0160,0140,0120,0100,080,060,04
Page 19:
The distribution of social security
Page 22 and 23:
22 R. Hryniewski, W. Mądry, D. Goz
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 35 and 36:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 35-43EDUCATI
Page 37 and 38:
Education as an element of competit
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43:
Page 46 and 47:
46 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55: 54 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
Page 56 and 57: 56 E. Majewski, P. Sulewski, M. Rag
Page 58 and 59: 58 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesIn the West
Page 60 and 61: 60 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesThe most im
Page 62 and 63: 62 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesGDPt= GDP0+
Page 64 and 65: 64 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTHE TIME SE
Page 66 and 67: 66 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesTable 4. Ac
Page 68 and 69: 68 L. Mazal, K.J. RowlesNelson Ch.R
Page 70 and 71: 70 A. Ptak-Chmielewskastatistics, w
Page 72 and 73: 72 A. Ptak-Chmielewska3025birth rat
Page 74 and 75: 74 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaSECTOR OF ACT
Page 76 and 77: 76 A. Ptak-Chmielewskabirth rate fo
Page 78 and 79: 78 A. Ptak-Chmielewskawere trade fi
Page 80 and 81: 80 A. Ptak-ChmielewskaREFERENCESBal
Page 83 and 84: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 83-95THE EFF
Page 85 and 86: The effi ciency of selected real es
Page 89 and 90: Table 1. Efficiency of real estate
Page 95: The effi ciency of selected real es
Page 98 and 99: 98 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaJalin
Page 100 and 101: 100 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela2007
Page 102 and 103: 102 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaTabl
Page 106 and 107: 106 J. Sosnowski, G.A. Ciepiela1400
Page 108 and 109: 108 J. Sosnowski, G.A. CiepielaOsek
Page 110 and 111: 110 E. SzymańskaProducts by Activi
Page 112 and 113: 112 E. Szymańskatroduced TFI which
Page 114 and 115: 114 E. Szymańskabers of companies
Page 116 and 117: 116 E. SzymańskaTable 3. Tourism v
Page 118 and 119: 118 E. SzymańskaREFERENCESCoccossi
Page 120 and 121: 120 J. WiśniewskaEvery society can
Page 122 and 123: 122 J. WiśniewskaStatistical analy
Page 124 and 125: 124 J. WiśniewskaCommon Agricultur
Page 126 and 127: 126 J. WiśniewskaTable 3. An attem
Page 128 and 129: 128 J. Wiśniewskathe application o
Page 130 and 131: 130 J. Wiśniewskainstitutional cos
Page 132 and 133: 132 J. Wiśniewskaemployed in agric
Page 134 and 135: 134 J. WiśniewskaLong term viabili
Page 136 and 137: 136 J. Wiśniewska--The level of re
Page 139 and 140: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 139-148INNOV
Page 141 and 142: Innovativeness of food production e
Page 149 and 150: Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 149-158LOCAL
Page 151 and 152: Local governance activities in supp
Page 153 and 154: Local governance activities in supp
Page 155 and 156:
Local governance activities in supp
Page 157 and 158:
Local governance activities in supp
Page 159 and 160:
Oeconomia 10 (1) 2011, 159-169CHANG
Page 161 and 162:
Changes in rural women’s movement
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169:
Page 172:
Ewa SzymańskaTourism function of M
show all

ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM - SGGW

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?