-14-Wife: "Arrl what I said [about love], that's noth<strong>in</strong>g? Won't theylTdltually love each other?"Husbani:"certa<strong>in</strong>ly they will love."Wife: "certa<strong>in</strong>ly they will love! Was that such a little matter?What has happened to you today?"Husbani: ''Noth<strong>in</strong>g. calm down a little arrl listen. I can expla<strong>in</strong>everytll<strong>in</strong>]. Arrl <strong>in</strong> what I am say<strong>in</strong>g there is even someth<strong>in</strong>g aboutlove" (Raydhaudhuri 1887:8)."'Ihese days," the husban:i says with disapproval,"...girls have only one mania; day arrl night thi.nk<strong>in</strong>g only 'love,love' [bhalobasa] they are unstable! '!here is no big news aboutlove. It is only a trick with words. If you love, not talk<strong>in</strong>g alot about good 'love,' not mak<strong>in</strong>g childish dem<strong>and</strong>s, doesn't lovehappen anyway? Look at the people of ancient times. You who are so<strong>in</strong>patient, talk<strong>in</strong>g about 'love,' 'love'--if they carne here, theywouldn't be able to un:lerstarrl even [so IlIUch as] the purpose of thistalk. &It because of that did they love less or did they f<strong>in</strong>d lesslove?" (Raychaudhuri 1887:8-9).<strong>Love</strong>, like hUl'X]er or thirst, is an <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ct nourished by good con:Iuct. Ifa husbarrl arrl wife help each other to accomplish the purpose of theirmarriage--if they became the helpers of each others' "duty arrl work"--thenlove occurs naturally. '!hen, "the husbar¥:l. has to love the wife; even if thisis not taught, it happens" (RaychaUdhuri 1887: 10) •&It the other k<strong>in</strong>d of love, says the husbar¥:l.,about, "there is a need to educate about that."the k<strong>in</strong>d currently talked.•.it is quite often seen that girls from childhood sit arrl beg<strong>in</strong> totalk about the aim of marriage. Repeat<strong>in</strong>g' love' 'love,' <strong>in</strong> the endlike a character <strong>in</strong> a novel some, pertlaps, go mad. '!heir m<strong>in</strong>ds are<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> noth<strong>in</strong>g else. Only the love of a husb<strong>and</strong> becomessuddenly as if it were the aim of life. In this there is harm, bothto them arrl to the husbams. [If] the husb<strong>and</strong> th<strong>in</strong>ks the wife ishis all [<strong>and</strong>] the wife th<strong>in</strong>ks the husbar¥:l. is her all, [then]household duty goes all to hell. <strong>Family</strong> duty goes all to hell.Only two people, sitt<strong>in</strong>g face to face, night arrl day, pass theirtime (RaychaUdhuri 1887:11).Neither the husbar¥:l. nor the wife, then, may live only <strong>for</strong> their own lovearrl happ<strong>in</strong>ess. Where ''Writ<strong>in</strong>gjRead<strong>in</strong>g'' urges women to became literate arrl:i.rrplies that a new k<strong>in</strong>d of relationship with their hi.IsbaIrls awaits them whenthey do, "Husbani arrl Wife" <strong>for</strong>bids any couple to live only <strong>for</strong> each other.Bhalobasa (romantic, exclusive love) is COIrlernned as trivial arrl selfish.<strong>Family</strong>, household, arrl duty all take precedence over personal happ<strong>in</strong>ess,personal choice, or mere "love." otheJ:Wise,...if the husbar¥:l. arrl wife only IlIUtually love each other that wouldnot be enough; if they are only IlIUtually search<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> the happ<strong>in</strong>ess
-15-of each other, that would not be enough-the H<strong>in</strong>du wife has to bethe co-practiser-of-duty of the H<strong>in</strong>du husb<strong>and</strong>, the one who, with herhusb<strong>and</strong> practices virtue. otheJ::wise don't you talk about a k<strong>in</strong>i oflove <strong>in</strong> which the husb<strong>and</strong>'s duty becomes the loss of his work?Don't you talk about a k<strong>in</strong>i of search <strong>for</strong> happ<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> which thehusb<strong>and</strong>'s future fruit becomes sorrow?"IDve is certa<strong>in</strong>ly a good th<strong>in</strong>g," the husb<strong>and</strong> says, =elud<strong>in</strong>g his restatementof an older, orthodox position. "'!he search <strong>for</strong> happ<strong>in</strong>ess is certa<strong>in</strong>ly a goodth<strong>in</strong>g. "&It you don't UIrlerst<strong>and</strong> these th<strong>in</strong>gs well. 'Ihat is why you have tobe given education <strong>in</strong> this way." (Raychaudhuri 1887:12)other chapters <strong>in</strong> GrtJa I.akshmi echo the same themes <strong>and</strong> show how isolatedthe irrplication of exlcusivity <strong>and</strong> romance <strong>in</strong> the chapter on literacy are. In"In-laws' House" a great emphasis is placed on the necessity of avoid<strong>in</strong>gquarrels with <strong>in</strong>-laws. It is the wife's responsibility to subord<strong>in</strong>atepersonal feel<strong>in</strong>gs to the greater demarxi of family tranquility.'lhere is no JrOre ill-fated husb<strong>and</strong> than the husb<strong>and</strong> of a maliciouswife. In the house where there is always envy. malice, competition,mutual bad-feel<strong>in</strong>gs, always quarrels, grombl<strong>in</strong>g--<strong>in</strong> that houseIDkkhi does not stay (Raychaudhuri 1887:34).In the chapter ''Husbarrl Go<strong>in</strong>g Abroad" the wife is discouraged from ask<strong>in</strong>g toaccompany her husb<strong>and</strong> when he goes away frOm hane to work or school. Herdeparture might disrupt <strong>and</strong> damage the family. Her obligation is not only tofulfill her own familial obligations but also to help the husb<strong>and</strong> to do thesame. "'!his then is the work of women," says the husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> conclusion:"It is necessary [that they] encourage the husb<strong>and</strong> [to do] his duty<strong>and</strong> work <strong>and</strong> to prevent [him from neglect<strong>in</strong>g] his duty. To cause[the husb<strong>and</strong>] to fall <strong>in</strong>to darger <strong>for</strong> her own happ<strong>in</strong>ess is the workof a bad woman (Raychaudhuri l887:Olap.6).Contradictory <strong>Roles</strong> <strong>for</strong> womenGrha I.akshmi offers its readers two contradictory roles <strong>for</strong> women: oneexplicit, one irrplicit. 'Ihe first, def<strong>in</strong>ed by the need to subord<strong>in</strong>atepersonal wishes <strong>and</strong> desires to family obligations, is consciously articulated<strong>and</strong> defended. '!he second, <strong>in</strong>spired by the fantasy of a romantic <strong>and</strong> exclusivelove relationship, is merely (not deliberately) irrplied. '!he two roles-thatof educated helIEl'lte <strong>and</strong> dutiful daughter-<strong>in</strong>-Iaw-are presented withoutacknowledg<strong>in</strong>g their contradictions, <strong>and</strong> to some extent the separate contextsout of which they arise helps the author to do this. In the chapters ontraditional subjects--<strong>in</strong> "Husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> wife" <strong>for</strong> example, or "In-laws' House"-the l::louOOaries with<strong>in</strong> which the author works are familiar to him. He is <strong>in</strong>the world of the "grtlo-Iokkhi," the traditional world of extended families,social duties, <strong>and</strong> the authority of elders. His ideas easily shape themselvesto fit a context set by older <strong>in</strong>digenous patterns.&It the context of the chapter on literacy is different. 'Ibis is asubject surrourrled by western criticisms of Indian society which were madenecessary, <strong>in</strong> fact, by the new conditions of life <strong>in</strong> British India. Even the