13.07.2015 Views

FY2006/07 to FY2008/09 - Department of Defence

FY2006/07 to FY2008/09 - Department of Defence

FY2006/07 to FY2008/09 - Department of Defence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

chapter 6OutputPerformance MeasureTarget<strong>FY2006</strong>/<strong>07</strong>FY20<strong>07</strong>/08<strong>FY2008</strong>/<strong>09</strong>Subprogramme Support CapabilityGeneral supportcapabilityDegree <strong>of</strong> achievement duringinternal evaluation 114 GSBs (generalsupport bases)70% client satisfactionPerformance according<strong>to</strong> plan13 GSBs (generalsupport bases)75% client satisfactionPerformance according<strong>to</strong> plan10 GSBs (generalsupport bases)80% client satisfactionPerformance according<strong>to</strong> planA support capability<strong>to</strong> ensuretechnical andlogistic sustainmen<strong>to</strong>fdeployed forcesThe degree <strong>to</strong> which therequired combat readinessstate and force employmentrequirements are achievedTwo Maint unitsTwo Maint units(Res F - leadergrouptraining)Two Fd WkspsTwo Fd Wksps(Res F - leadergrouptraining)Two Maint unitsTwo Maint units(Res F - leader-grouptraining)Two Fd WkspsTwo Fd Wksps(Res F - leader-grouptraining)Two Maint unitsTwo Maint units(Res F - leadergrouptraining)Two Fd WkspsTwo Fd Wksps(Res F - leadergrouptraining)CeremonialservicesDegree <strong>of</strong> achievement duringinternal evaluationNational CeremonialGuardCeremonial servicesin accordance withrequirementsNational CeremonialGuardCeremonial servicesin accordance withrequirements.National CeremonialGuardCeremonial servicesin accordance withrequirements.Subprogramme General Training CapabilityCommand andcontrolcapabilityDegree <strong>of</strong> achievement duringinternal evaluation in Fmn HQon personnel, force structure,MS, communication,force preparation, R&D,SSS, finances, plan andbudgetingFormationHeadquartersRequired standard <strong>of</strong>at least 70% duringall evaluations 2FormationHeadquartersRequired standard <strong>of</strong>at least 75% duringall evaluations.FormationHeadquartersRequired standard <strong>of</strong>at least 80% duringall evaluations.Command andmanagementtrainingThe degree <strong>to</strong> which trainingis presented as plannedDesired course content andthrough-put based on SAArmy career developmentplanSA Army CollegeTwo JCSD learningopportunities200 <strong>of</strong>ficers qualifiedSA Army CollegeTwo JCSD learningopportunities200 <strong>of</strong>ficers qualifiedSA Army CollegeTwo JCSD learningopportunities200 <strong>of</strong>ficers qualifiedLandward commontrainingcapabilityThe degree <strong>to</strong> which trainingis presented as plannedDesired course content andthrough-put based on SAArmy career developmentplanCombat TrainingCentre (CTC)25 learning opportunities830 learnersCombat TrainingCentre (CTC)25l learning opportunities830 learnersCombat TrainingCentre (CTC)25 learning opportunities830 learnersTable 6.2Landward <strong>Defence</strong> Programme - Output details per Subprogramme for <strong>FY2006</strong>/<strong>07</strong> <strong>to</strong><strong>FY2008</strong>/<strong>09</strong> (continued)2GSBs not structured <strong>to</strong> deliver support as required <strong>to</strong> both FSE's and operational deployments. This includes the erodedTSC capability.2GSB low client satisfaction also reflects the low serviceability <strong>of</strong> support vehicles due <strong>to</strong> insufficient and eroded TSC capability,as well as structural deficiencies.S T R A T E G I C B U S I N E S S P L A N F Y 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 T O 2 0 0 8 / 0 945

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!