FY2006/07 to FY2008/09 - Department of Defence
FY2006/07 to FY2008/09 - Department of Defence
FY2006/07 to FY2008/09 - Department of Defence
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
chapter 1DEFENCE PROGRAMMESResourcesThe outputs <strong>of</strong> the DOD are executedthrough nine programmes: <strong>Defence</strong> Administration Force Employment Landward <strong>Defence</strong> Air <strong>Defence</strong> Maritime <strong>Defence</strong> Military Health Service <strong>Defence</strong> Intelligence Joint Support Special <strong>Defence</strong> AccountBUDGET ALLOCATIONForce Employment R1 410 145 2,1%The medium-term budget allocationwithin the framework <strong>of</strong><strong>Defence</strong> programmes includingobjectives and outputs. Allocationis viewed from three perspectivesie process, resources and investment.The funding changesbetween FY2005/6 and <strong>FY2006</strong>/7Processreflect strategic decisions impactingon the medium term.Figure 1.1 Resource/Process/Investment RelationshipThe medium-term allocationreflects general inflation adjustments <strong>of</strong> 4% <strong>to</strong> 6% in eachperspective. Further adjustments are as follows:The process perspective indicates that in order <strong>to</strong> preparedefence capabilities <strong>to</strong> support Government’s initiativesadditional resources are allocated <strong>to</strong>ward themodernization <strong>of</strong> defence equipment; renewing defenceinformation and communication systems; further rejuvenatingthe human resources component; and investingin the maintenance and repair <strong>of</strong> defence infrastructureand facilities. This is also evident in the personneland information categories in the resource perspectiveand as consumption in the investment perspective.The process perspective indicates a fair decline in forcedevelopment resulting from the downturn in the annualfinancial commitments on the strategic defence procurementprojects. These procurements reached its financialpayment peak in the 2005/06 financial year, it has nowentered a declining trend <strong>to</strong>wards the finalization in the2011/12 financial year. This trend is evident in theinvestment perspective and has an influence in themateriél <strong>of</strong> the resource perspective.Major emphasis will be placed on the support <strong>of</strong> theforces with substantial increases in resource allocations<strong>to</strong>wards the strategic imagery and electronic collectionMateriél R14 045 159 2,3%Information R808 961 15,3%Personnel R8 975 985 6,3%Force Preparation R5 931 831 5,5%Force Development R7 247 400 13,5%Force Support R9 060 729 14,3%InvestmentR7 725 65012,7%ConsumptionR16 104 4559,8%Investmentcapability and <strong>to</strong> the anti-retroviral rollout programmeevident in the process perspective, the investment perspective'sconsumption and the resource perspective'sinformation.Medium-term allocation adjustments per sub-programmeare identified and explained in Chapter 21 <strong>of</strong>the <strong>FY2006</strong>/<strong>07</strong> Estimate <strong>of</strong> National Expenditure.RISK MANAGEMENT PLANAll amounts inR'000.Percentage (%)reflects fundingchange betweenFY 2006/7 andFY 2005/06.The DOD Risk Management Strategy, compiled by theCFO on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Sec Def in his capacity asAccounting Officer <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong>, is aimed at settingand formalising the <strong>Department</strong>'s approach <strong>to</strong> riskmanagement, taking in<strong>to</strong> account the MaterialityFramework and Fraud Prevention Plan that support thestrategy. The Strategy <strong>of</strong> the DOD as it relates <strong>to</strong> RiskManagement is as follows: Risk management forms an integral part <strong>of</strong> the<strong>to</strong>tal management process <strong>of</strong> the DOD and isthe responsibility <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong>ficial in the DOD. All pertinent risks are identified, prioritised,and action plans are subsequently developed<strong>to</strong> mitigate or minimize the materiality <strong>of</strong> theserisks <strong>to</strong> an acceptable level, in line with theS T R A T E G I C B U S I N E S S P L A N F Y 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 T O 2 0 0 8 / 0 97