13.07.2015 Views

FY2006/07 to FY2008/09 - Department of Defence

FY2006/07 to FY2008/09 - Department of Defence

FY2006/07 to FY2008/09 - Department of Defence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

chapter 1DEFENCE PROGRAMMESResourcesThe outputs <strong>of</strong> the DOD are executedthrough nine programmes: <strong>Defence</strong> Administration Force Employment Landward <strong>Defence</strong> Air <strong>Defence</strong> Maritime <strong>Defence</strong> Military Health Service <strong>Defence</strong> Intelligence Joint Support Special <strong>Defence</strong> AccountBUDGET ALLOCATIONForce Employment R1 410 145 2,1%The medium-term budget allocationwithin the framework <strong>of</strong><strong>Defence</strong> programmes includingobjectives and outputs. Allocationis viewed from three perspectivesie process, resources and investment.The funding changesbetween FY2005/6 and <strong>FY2006</strong>/7Processreflect strategic decisions impactingon the medium term.Figure 1.1 Resource/Process/Investment RelationshipThe medium-term allocationreflects general inflation adjustments <strong>of</strong> 4% <strong>to</strong> 6% in eachperspective. Further adjustments are as follows:The process perspective indicates that in order <strong>to</strong> preparedefence capabilities <strong>to</strong> support Government’s initiativesadditional resources are allocated <strong>to</strong>ward themodernization <strong>of</strong> defence equipment; renewing defenceinformation and communication systems; further rejuvenatingthe human resources component; and investingin the maintenance and repair <strong>of</strong> defence infrastructureand facilities. This is also evident in the personneland information categories in the resource perspectiveand as consumption in the investment perspective.The process perspective indicates a fair decline in forcedevelopment resulting from the downturn in the annualfinancial commitments on the strategic defence procurementprojects. These procurements reached its financialpayment peak in the 2005/06 financial year, it has nowentered a declining trend <strong>to</strong>wards the finalization in the2011/12 financial year. This trend is evident in theinvestment perspective and has an influence in themateriél <strong>of</strong> the resource perspective.Major emphasis will be placed on the support <strong>of</strong> theforces with substantial increases in resource allocations<strong>to</strong>wards the strategic imagery and electronic collectionMateriél R14 045 159 2,3%Information R808 961 15,3%Personnel R8 975 985 6,3%Force Preparation R5 931 831 5,5%Force Development R7 247 400 13,5%Force Support R9 060 729 14,3%InvestmentR7 725 65012,7%ConsumptionR16 104 4559,8%Investmentcapability and <strong>to</strong> the anti-retroviral rollout programmeevident in the process perspective, the investment perspective'sconsumption and the resource perspective'sinformation.Medium-term allocation adjustments per sub-programmeare identified and explained in Chapter 21 <strong>of</strong>the <strong>FY2006</strong>/<strong>07</strong> Estimate <strong>of</strong> National Expenditure.RISK MANAGEMENT PLANAll amounts inR'000.Percentage (%)reflects fundingchange betweenFY 2006/7 andFY 2005/06.The DOD Risk Management Strategy, compiled by theCFO on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Sec Def in his capacity asAccounting Officer <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong>, is aimed at settingand formalising the <strong>Department</strong>'s approach <strong>to</strong> riskmanagement, taking in<strong>to</strong> account the MaterialityFramework and Fraud Prevention Plan that support thestrategy. The Strategy <strong>of</strong> the DOD as it relates <strong>to</strong> RiskManagement is as follows: Risk management forms an integral part <strong>of</strong> the<strong>to</strong>tal management process <strong>of</strong> the DOD and isthe responsibility <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong>ficial in the DOD. All pertinent risks are identified, prioritised,and action plans are subsequently developed<strong>to</strong> mitigate or minimize the materiality <strong>of</strong> theserisks <strong>to</strong> an acceptable level, in line with theS T R A T E G I C B U S I N E S S P L A N F Y 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 T O 2 0 0 8 / 0 97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!