13.07.2015 Views

Characteristics of Households - Childinfo.org

Characteristics of Households - Childinfo.org

Characteristics of Households - Childinfo.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Safe disposal <strong>of</strong> a child’s faeces is disposing <strong>of</strong> the stool, bythe child using a toilet or by rinsing the stool into a toiletor latrine. Data on disposal <strong>of</strong> faeces <strong>of</strong> children 0–2years <strong>of</strong> age is presented in Table WS.7. The percentage<strong>of</strong> children whose stools were disposed <strong>of</strong> safely was 26percent in Serbia.Table WS.7: Disposal <strong>of</strong> child’s faeces, Serbia, 2010Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> children age 0–2 years according to place <strong>of</strong> disposal<strong>of</strong> child’s faeces, and the percentage <strong>of</strong> children age 0–2 years whose stoolswere disposed <strong>of</strong> safely the last time the child passed stoolsChild usedtoilet/latrinePut/rinsedinto toiletor latrinePut/rinsedinto drain orditchPlace <strong>of</strong> disposal <strong>of</strong> child’s faecesThrownintogarbageBuriedLeft inthe openOther Missing/DK TotalPercentage <strong>of</strong>children whosestools weredisposed <strong>of</strong>safely 1Number <strong>of</strong>childrenage 0–2yearsType <strong>of</strong> sanitaton facility in dwelling*Improved 10.0 15.5 .3 72.7 .0 .1 .0 1.4 100.0 25.5 1927Unimproved (17.1) (20.3) (6.2) (56.4) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 100.0 (37.4) 39RegionBelgrade 6.2 15.1 .3 77.5 .0 .0 .0 0.9 100.0 21.2 359Vojvodina 11.5 18.2 .5 68.9 .1 .2 .0 0.5 100.0 29.8 574Sumadija andWestern Serbia9.2 15.4 .7 72.3 .0 .2 .1 2.1 100.0 24.6 525Southern andEastern Serbia12.4 13.0 .0 72.8 .0 .0 .0 1.8 100.0 25.5 510AreaUrban 10.0 15.0 .5 73.3 .0 .0 .0 1.2 100.0 25.0 1047Rural 10.3 16.2 .3 71.3 .1 .3 .0 1.5 100.0 26.6 921Mother’s educationPrimary 13.1 22.2 .3 63.4 .2 .0 .0 0.8 100.0 35.3 296Secondary 9.9 14.4 .5 73.2 .0 .1 .0 1.9 100.0 24.3 1116Higher 9.5 14.9 .2 74.8 .0 .0 .1 0.6 100.0 24.4 533Wealth index quintilePoorest 7.6 20.3 .6 69.5 .2 .4 .0 1.5 100.0 27.8 394Second 10.2 10.9 .0 76.7 .0 .2 .0 2.0 100.0 21.1 344Middle 12.3 18.1 .3 68.8 .0 .0 .0 .5 100.0 30.4 334Fourth 10.2 14.0 .3 74.3 .0 .0 .0 1.2 100.0 24.1 388Richest 10.7 14.6 .6 72.5 .0 .0 .1 1.4 100.0 25.4 507Total 10.2 15.6 .4 72.4 .0 .1 .0 1.3 100.0 25.7 19681MICS indicator 4.4( ) Figures that are based on 25–49 unweighted cases* Disaggregation category “Open defacation” is not shown in the table due to a small number <strong>of</strong> occurences (less than 25 unweighted cases)102MULTIPLE INDICATOR CLUSTER SURVEY 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!