13.07.2015 Views

A note of the representation of the Drazin inverse of 2x2 block matrix

A note of the representation of the Drazin inverse of 2x2 block matrix

A note of the representation of the Drazin inverse of 2x2 block matrix

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In this paper, using an additive result for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drazin</strong> inverese provedin [6],[we derive]formulae for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drazin</strong> <strong>inverse</strong> <strong>of</strong> a 2 × 2 <strong>block</strong> <strong>matrix</strong>A BM = , under <strong>the</strong> conditions weaker than those in <strong>the</strong> papers [9],C D[11], [12] and [14].2 ResultsFirst, we present an additive result for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drazin</strong> <strong>inverse</strong> proved in [6],which we will be useful in proving our main result.Theorem 2.1 Let P, Q ∈ C n×n be such that Q dconditions are satisfied= 0 and <strong>the</strong> followingP π Q = Q, P QP π = 0. (3)Then,∞∑(P + Q) d = P d + (P + Q) n Q(P d ) n+2 .n=0In <strong>the</strong> following <strong>the</strong>orem we derive a formula for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drazin</strong> <strong>inverse</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>block</strong>-<strong>matrix</strong> M under some ra<strong>the</strong>r cumbersome and complicated conditionsbut <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>orem itself will have a number <strong>of</strong> useful consequences which willinclude much simpler conditions.[ A BTheorem 2.2 Let M =C Dand], where A ∈ C n×n and D ∈ C m×m . IfD π C = C, BCA π = 0, DCA π = 0 (4)i D −1∑(A d ) n+1 BD n C = 0,n=0i∑D −1n=0i∑D −1n=0DC(A d ) n+1 BD n D π = 0,BC(A d ) n+1 BD n D π = 0,(5)3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!