About This Particular Macintosh 6.04 - eDisk

About This Particular Macintosh 6.04 - eDisk About This Particular Macintosh 6.04 - eDisk

edisk.fandm.edu
from edisk.fandm.edu More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

Columns: DSL and the MacSlices From The Macintosh LifeSegmentsBY LEE BENNETT, LBENNETT@ATPM.COMDSL and the MacWhat is it that makes DSL the most popular technology not available to most Macintoshusers—or at least those of us in the Southeastern states?Sprint and Earthlink are business partners of sorts. They’ve joined forces to provide peoplewith broadband Internet access; Sprint provides the bandwidth, and Earthlink fills the roleof ISP. If that was a true statement, then it has the makings of being the worst business partnershipof recent months.I’ve held my breath waiting for Earthlink to make DSL available to the central Florida area.All they’ve managed to tell me is that it would very likely be a very long time before that happens—probablynot even this year.Yet, last November, Sprint announced DSL availability in the metro Orlando region. Indeed,a coworker of one of my friends actually has DSL service from Sprint, though that personuses a Windows machine. I contacted Sprint to inquire about getting it installed at my home.To my wonderment, the Sprint representative confirmed that my line was good for DSL andbegan the process of signing me up. Not one minute passed before my excitement turnedinto disappointment. “Are you running Windows 95, 98, or NT?” the representative asked.I truthfully replied, “I’m running Mac OS.”“I see, well, I’m afraid we are not offering DSL service to Macintosh users at this time.”“Why is that? Macintoshes use the exact same TCP connection that PCs use.”“I’m not a technician, and I don’t have the details about this, except that we can’t supportMacintosh computers right now.”ATPM 6.04 ← 34 →Columns: DSL and the Mac

I was seething, but I did my best not to let it show. As a fellow ATPM staff member confirmed,there is nothing to support with Macs and DSL. The same data is placed into bothplatforms’ TCP/IP control panels. However, after a number of phone calls, and after a lot oftelephone Muzak, the best answer I was able to obtain was that the reason for nonsupport isrelated to one or more of three issues. These issues may or may not be plausible, but they’rewhat I came up with:1. Many broadband technologies are using authentication software that must run on thecomputer using the service. Some companies have developed their own authenticationsoftware for both platforms, but many have developed it only for PC with a “Mac versionforthcoming” claim.2. Many broadband technologies are using the new transport protocol known as point-topointprotocol over Ethernet (better-known as PPPoE), and this protocol isn’t as easilyimplemented on the Mac as it is on Windows (or so they say).3. Many broadband technologies not using PPPoE are using DHCP as the connection protocol,and we all know that the Mac OS has had documented problems with DHCP. Notthat I’m saying the problems aren’t solvable…just that various broadband providersthemselves haven’t solved them.Totally for my own amusement, I invented a fourth choice:4. Many broadband technology providers are full of cr@& and just don’t think the Maccommunity is large enough or easy enough to service.Sprint service representatives repeatedly tried to explain the situation to me, but withoutsaying anything that Sprint brass probably considers taboo for discussions with customers(subjects such as the truth). During my last call to Sprint, I ultimately spoke to the directorof customer relations. I pointed out that I’d had conversations with Earthlink, and that theirtech support people had said that not only are they offering Earthlink DSL over on the westcoast in many areas, but that Earthlink specializes in Macintosh support.When she said that they’re still researching and testing connectivity for Macs, I casually(though I was getting irritated at this point, and again doing my best not to show it) suggestedthat it looked like a case of the right hand not knowing what the left was doing, andthat Sprint should better interact with the ISP they’ve partnered with—i.e., that they shouldATPM 6.04 ← 35 →Columns: DSL and the Mac

Columns: DSL and the MacSlices From The <strong>Macintosh</strong> LifeSegmentsBY LEE BENNETT, LBENNETT@ATPM.COMDSL and the MacWhat is it that makes DSL the most popular technology not available to most <strong>Macintosh</strong>users—or at least those of us in the Southeastern states?Sprint and Earthlink are business partners of sorts. They’ve joined forces to provide peoplewith broadband Internet access; Sprint provides the bandwidth, and Earthlink fills the roleof ISP. If that was a true statement, then it has the makings of being the worst business partnershipof recent months.I’ve held my breath waiting for Earthlink to make DSL available to the central Florida area.All they’ve managed to tell me is that it would very likely be a very long time before that happens—probablynot even this year.Yet, last November, Sprint announced DSL availability in the metro Orlando region. Indeed,a coworker of one of my friends actually has DSL service from Sprint, though that personuses a Windows machine. I contacted Sprint to inquire about getting it installed at my home.To my wonderment, the Sprint representative confirmed that my line was good for DSL andbegan the process of signing me up. Not one minute passed before my excitement turnedinto disappointment. “Are you running Windows 95, 98, or NT?” the representative asked.I truthfully replied, “I’m running Mac OS.”“I see, well, I’m afraid we are not offering DSL service to <strong>Macintosh</strong> users at this time.”“Why is that? <strong>Macintosh</strong>es use the exact same TCP connection that PCs use.”“I’m not a technician, and I don’t have the details about this, except that we can’t support<strong>Macintosh</strong> computers right now.”ATPM <strong>6.04</strong> ← 34 →Columns: DSL and the Mac

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!