ACRESImp. Habitat for Econ.Imp. SpeciesChange in Impact of Human Modification - 2000 to2030Low Moderate High Very High TotalLow 18,431 1,000,094 891,036 726,035 2,635,597Moderate 15,709 403,833 442,631 491,317 1,353,490High 3,680 53,504 150,523 139,664 347,372Very High 169 3,228 25,848 14,405 43,651Total 37,990 1,460,659 1,510,039 1,371,422 4,380,110Table 26 – Threat from Human Modification to Habitat for EconomicSpecies (acres)Data Gaps• Need more consistent data on priority habitat locations for all of<strong>Colorado</strong>’s Species of Greatest Conservation Need associated withforests.• Need more complete information on forest-related threats to aquatichabitats.Protect and Enhance <strong>Forest</strong>-Based Recreation OpportunitiesOverview: According to <strong>Colorado</strong>’s 2008 <strong>Statewide</strong> Comprehensive OutdoorRecreation Plan (SCORP), many of the state’s most popular recreationdestinations are directly tied to forests. The USFS manages the majority (14.4million acres) of public lands available for outdoor recreation in <strong>Colorado</strong>.These national forests receive more visitors (27.1 million) each year than thoseof any other state in the nation (Jaffe 2009). In addition to providing benefi tsfor health and well-being, forest-based recreation contributes signifi cantly to<strong>Colorado</strong>’s economy. An Outdoor Industry Foundation report for the statesuggests that <strong>Colorado</strong> receives more than $10 billion annually from activitiessolely associated with “active outdoor recreation” (Babcock and Newman2008). Skiing, in particular, is big business in the state. Twenty-two ski areas in<strong>Colorado</strong> are under permit on national forests and experience more than 12million skier visits annually. Tourism revenue associated with skiing regularlytops $2 billion annually in the state (USFS 2008).The top fi ve planning issues of concern identifi ed in the 2008 SCORP includeforest health, insect infestations and wildfi re related to “EnvironmentalChange.” Among the potential adverse affects to recreation associated withany decline in <strong>Colorado</strong>’s forest health are:• diminished scenic value and elevated wildfi re risk;• a decline in hunting related to habitat loss;• a decline in overnight camping associated with campfi re bans, loss ofaccess to some public areas because of wildfi res and a decline in thenumber of areas that provide shade and privacy;• a decline in scenic touring and park visits associated with impacts fromwildfi res;• heightened concerns for public safety related to standing dead and fallentrees; and• facility closures related to wildfi res.62
Analysis: <strong>Forest</strong> management can provide positive benefi ts for outdoorrecreation: it can reduce risks from wildfi re and insect and diseaseinfestations; address safety concerns such as hazardous trees; maintain orenhance wildlife and fi sh habitat; improve recreation facilities and trails; andpromote scenic diversity. No statewide assessment of forest-based recreationopportunities currently exists for <strong>Colorado</strong>. To provide a basis for assessingthis forest value, data regarding publicly accessible, forest-based recreationopportunities from a number of entities was collected and combined toproduce a map that shows where the greatest density of forest-basedrecreation opportunities exists across the state. This analysis shows nearly10 million acres with a high to very high density of forest-based recreationopportunities. The majority of these acres are in spruce-fi r, aspen and piñonjuniperforests, with the vast majority under USFS management. It shouldbe noted that this analysis does not incorporate any measure of visitor use,which, if available, would indicate where recreation areas experience thegreatest demand.Map 27 – Density of <strong>Forest</strong>-Based Recreation Opportunity63
- Page 1 and 2:
Colorado Statewide ForestResource A
- Page 3:
Table of ContentsI. Executive Summa
- Page 6 and 7:
II.BackgroundThe Colorado Statewide
- Page 8 and 9:
National Guidance for Statewide For
- Page 10 and 11:
III. Overview of Colorado’s Fores
- Page 12 and 13:
Spruce-Fir 9Spruce-fi r is among th
- Page 14 and 15:
Mixed Conifer 14The mixed conifer f
- Page 16 and 17: Oak ShrublandsOak shrublands cover
- Page 18 and 19: Windbreaks, shelterbelts and their
- Page 20 and 21: Owner Spruce-Fir Lodgepole Aspen Mi
- Page 22 and 23: forest management costs per acre ha
- Page 24 and 25: include standard ownership data and
- Page 26 and 27: The second metric is an estimate of
- Page 28 and 29: Map 4 - Colorado Forest Legacy Area
- Page 30 and 31: NATIONAL THEME: Protect Forests fro
- Page 32 and 33: Map 7 - Wildland Fire Susceptibilit
- Page 34 and 35: Map 8 - Wildland Fire Intensity Ind
- Page 36 and 37: ot (CSFS 2001 and 2002). Some insec
- Page 38 and 39: Map 10 - Insect and Disease Mitigat
- Page 40 and 41: is legally mandated, as well as dal
- Page 42 and 43: change, including species extinctio
- Page 44 and 45: transport of materi als that can ad
- Page 46 and 47: Map 15 - Post-Fire Erosion RiskMap
- Page 48 and 49: environment, many homes and other s
- Page 50 and 51: Owner 0.5 mile 1 mile 2 mile TotalU
- Page 52 and 53: Map 18 - Wildland-Urban Interface w
- Page 54 and 55: Map 20 - Wildland-Urban Interface w
- Page 56 and 57: They also are important partners in
- Page 58 and 59: Forest TypeAcres for Wood Products
- Page 60 and 61: of fragmentation to help forest man
- Page 62 and 63: Forest Type Low Moderate High Very
- Page 64 and 65: Map 25 - Important Habitat for Econ
- Page 68 and 69: Forest Type Low Moderate High Very
- Page 70 and 71: Map 28 - Community Forestry Opportu
- Page 72 and 73: Enhance Public Benefits from Trees
- Page 78 and 79: VI. ReferencesAlexander, K. [Intern
- Page 80 and 81: Neely, B., Comer, P., Moritz, C., L
- Page 82 and 83: VII. Statewide Assessment Steering
- Page 84 and 85: APPENDIX A - Colorado Statewide For
- Page 86 and 87: • Identify and conserve high prio
- Page 88 and 89: assessments and resource strategies
- Page 90 and 91: National Theme: Protect Forests fro
- Page 92 and 93: Protect, conserve, and enhance wild
- Page 94: States are encouraged to draw from