Colorado Statewide Forest Resource Assessment

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AcknowledgementsThe Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) thanks Joe Duda, CSFS ForestManagement Division supervisor and Skip Edel, CSFS GIS specialist, forproviding leadership and oversight throughout the development of Colorado’sStatewide Forest Resource Assessment. We also offer our thanks andacknowledgement to the Colorado Chapter of The Nature Conservancy,particularly project manager Paige Lewis and GIS specialist Jan Koenig, fortheir work in establishing the foundation for this document. The many partnerswho assisted with the project also deserve recognition and thanks, includingRenee Rondeau, Lee Grunau and Michelle Fink, Colorado Natural HeritageProgram; Cheri Ford, U.S. Forest Service; Deborah Martin, U.S. GeologicalSurvey; and all the members of the Assessment Steering Team and thematicwork groups (see Section VII).Additional thanks to Judy Serby, Lisa Mason, Katherine Timm, CSFS OutreachDivision, for production of this report.The CSFS is grateful for the generosity of the following for the use of theiroutstanding photographs:Cover photos, clockwise from upper left: William Ciesla, CSFS Nursery,William Ciesla, Jen Chase, Damon Lange, Dave Leatherman.Pages “Acknowledgements”-1; 4-5; 16-17; 38-39; 50-51; 68-69 – IngridAguayoPages 12-13; 40-41; 46-47; 60-61 – Dan Bihn (DanBihn.com)Pages 8-9 – Jen ChasePages 32-33 – Bill CottonPages 2-3; 6-7; 10-11; 14-15; 18-23; 26-31; 34-35; 42-45; 48-49; 52-53;62-63 – Dave LeathermanWhere not attributed, photos were supplied by the CSFS. Photos may not beused without the express written consent of the individual photographers andthe Colorado State Forest Service.
Table of ContentsI. Executive Summary 1II. Background 2State and Private Forestry Redesign Initiative 2National Guidance for Statewide Forest Resource Assessments 4Process for Development of Colorado’s Statewide Assessment 4III. Overview of Colorado’s Forests 6Colorado’s Forest Types 6Ownership of Colorado’s Forests 14Management History 17IV. Opportunities for Positive Action 19Core Data Layers 19National Theme: Conserve Working Forest Lands 21National Theme: Protect Forests from Harm 26National Theme: Enhance Public Benefi ts from Trees and Forests 39V. Priority Landscapes/Emphasis Areas for Colorado 69Conserve Working Forest Lands: Combined Theme Map 70Protect Forests from Harm: Combined Theme Map 71Enhance Public Benefi ts from Trees and Forests:Combined Theme Map 72Final Analysis Map Combining All Three Themes 73VI. References 74VII. Steering Team Members and Other Participants 78VIII. Outreach Presentations and Workshops 79IX. AppendicesA. National Guidance for Statewide Assessments and Strategies(located at the end of this document)B. Data Methods and SourcesC. Data GapsD. Spatial Analysis ProjectE. Forest Legacy Assessment of NeedF. Forest Industry Profi leG. Departure from Modeled Historical ConditionsH. Urban Infl uence AreasI. Colorado Wildlife Action PlanThe Colorado Statewide Resource Assessment and all appendicesare available online on the Colorado State Forest Service website athttp://csfs.colostate.edu/pages/statewide-forest-assessment.html.Appendices B — I are not included in this document.
Page 1: Colorado Statewide ForestResource A
Page 6 and 7: II.BackgroundThe Colorado Statewide
Page 8 and 9: National Guidance for Statewide For
Page 10 and 11: III. Overview of Colorado’s Fores
Page 12 and 13: Spruce-Fir 9Spruce-fi r is among th
Page 14 and 15: Mixed Conifer 14The mixed conifer f
Page 16 and 17: Oak ShrublandsOak shrublands cover
Page 18 and 19: Windbreaks, shelterbelts and their
Page 20 and 21: Owner Spruce-Fir Lodgepole Aspen Mi
Page 22 and 23: forest management costs per acre ha
Page 24 and 25: include standard ownership data and
Page 26 and 27: The second metric is an estimate of
Page 28 and 29: Map 4 - Colorado Forest Legacy Area
Page 30 and 31: NATIONAL THEME: Protect Forests fro
Page 32 and 33: Map 7 - Wildland Fire Susceptibilit
Page 34 and 35: Map 8 - Wildland Fire Intensity Ind
Page 36 and 37: ot (CSFS 2001 and 2002). Some insec
Page 38 and 39: Map 10 - Insect and Disease Mitigat
Page 40 and 41: is legally mandated, as well as dal
Page 42 and 43: change, including species extinctio
Page 44 and 45: transport of materi als that can ad
Page 46 and 47: Map 15 - Post-Fire Erosion RiskMap
Page 48 and 49: environment, many homes and other s
Page 50 and 51: Owner 0.5 mile 1 mile 2 mile TotalU
Page 52 and 53:
Map 18 - Wildland-Urban Interface w
Page 54 and 55:
Map 20 - Wildland-Urban Interface w
Page 56 and 57:
They also are important partners in
Page 58 and 59:
Forest TypeAcres for Wood Products
Page 60 and 61:
of fragmentation to help forest man
Page 62 and 63:
Forest Type Low Moderate High Very
Page 64 and 65:
Map 25 - Important Habitat for Econ
Page 66 and 67:
ACRESImp. Habitat for Econ.Imp. Spe
Page 68 and 69:
Forest Type Low Moderate High Very
Page 70 and 71:
Map 28 - Community Forestry Opportu
Page 72 and 73:
Enhance Public Benefits from Trees
Page 78 and 79:
VI. ReferencesAlexander, K. [Intern
Page 80 and 81:
Neely, B., Comer, P., Moritz, C., L
Page 82 and 83:
VII. Statewide Assessment Steering
Page 84 and 85:
APPENDIX A - Colorado Statewide For
Page 86 and 87:
• Identify and conserve high prio
Page 88 and 89:
assessments and resource strategies
Page 90 and 91:
National Theme: Protect Forests fro
Page 92 and 93:
Protect, conserve, and enhance wild
Page 94:
States are encouraged to draw from
show all

Colorado Statewide Forest Resource Assessment

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?