Oak ShrublandsOak shrublands cover approximately 2 million acres in <strong>Colorado</strong> betweenelevations of approximately 6,000 and 9,000 feet. These shrublands accountfor 10 percent of the forested lands in <strong>Colorado</strong> and are found throughoutmost of western <strong>Colorado</strong>, along the southern Front Range and in the centralpart of the state. Their appearance can range from dense thickets with littleunderstory to relatively moist sites with a rich understory of shrubs, grassesand wildfl owers. Fifty-seven percent of <strong>Colorado</strong>’s oak shrublands are inprivate ownership; the USFS and BLM are responsible for approximately 19percent and 18 percent, respectively.Fire usually plays an important role in maintaining oak shrublands; itpromotes regeneration, controls the invasion of trees, and increases thedensity and cover of Gambel oak and serviceberry (CNHP 2009). Many ofthese landscapes currently suffer from altered fi re regimes due to extensivefi re suppression, especially in the wildland-urban interface. Wildlife speciesassociated with oak shrublands include sharp-tailed grouse, mule deer, elk,Abert’s squirrels, black bears, blue grouse and Merriam’s turkey. Populationsof some shrubland birds have been in sharp decline for quite some time.Among these species is the green-tailed towhee – a typical inhabitant of oakshrublands. Oak shrublands is a primary habitat for 17 Species of GreatestConservation Need (CDOW 2006).Montane RiparianMontane riparian forests occur along rivers and streams in <strong>Colorado</strong>’s foothilland mountain regions, beginning around 6,000 to 7,500 feet in elevation.Montane riparian forests occupy roughly 1 million acres in <strong>Colorado</strong> andaccount for 4 percent of the state’s forested lands. These forests tend to bedominated by alder and blue spruce, but may be imbedded within severalother forest types, including ponderosa pine, aspen and spruce-fi r. The USFSmanages the majority of <strong>Colorado</strong>’s montane riparian (40 percent) and privatelandowners (36 percent). Riparian forests may be found within the fl oodzone of rivers, on islands, sand or cobble bars, and immediately adjacent tostreambanks. The health and sustainability of these systems depends on anatural hydrologic regime, especially annual to episodic fl ooding.In a semi-arid state such as <strong>Colorado</strong>, the benefi t of riparian areas to wildlifeoften is disproportionate relative to their size. The vast majority of speciesthat occupy montane habitats rely on riparian forests at some point in theirlife cycle. This is especially true of many amphibian species, as well as suchwater-dependent species as beaver and river otter. Elk, mule deer and moosealso favor montane riparian habitats. Boreal toads and northern leopard frogsare closely associated with montane riparian forests and adjacent wetlands– these habitats are especially important as breeding sites. <strong>Colorado</strong>’s mostimportant fi sheries are mountain streams surrounded by riparian forests. Morethan 50 percent of the state’s native fi sh are Species of Greatest ConservationNeed and nearly all rely on riparian forests to maintain healthy populations.Riparian forests, including both montane and plains types, also are importantfor a number of migratory and tree-roosting bats, including the red bat, silverhairedbat and hoary bat.Plains RiparianLow-elevation plains riparian systems are found along rivers and streamsthroughout the western Great Plains. At 250,000 acres, these forests representjust 1 percent of the state’s forested lands, but they support a tremendous12
amount of biodiversity. Ownership of these forests is dominated by privatelandowners (190,358 acres) but the state (23,584 acres) and BLM (11,146acres) also control notable portions. Where plains riparian systems supportforests, those forests typically are dominated by plains cottonwood inassociation with several species of willow and a variety of shrubs, grassesand forbs. Like montane riparian forests, plains riparian areas have adisproportionate benefi t to wildlife species relative to their size. Native prairiefi shes and amphibians (especially leopard frogs) are typical indicators ofhealthy plains riparian systems. Bald eagles occur here year-round andneotropical songbirds are common inhabitants during migration and breedingseason. Other typical species include deer (white-tail and mule), Merriam’sturkey and a variety of owls.Low-elevation riparian systems often are subjected to heavy grazing and/orother agricultural use, and can be signifi cantly degraded. This degradationleaves them vulnerable to invasion by non-native grasses, forbs and shrubs.Tamarisk and Russian olive are particularly prominent. Riparian forestsalso may be seriously impacted by pollution, surface water diversions andgroundwater depletions. Overall, prairie riparian and wetland ecologicalsystems (along with shortgrass prairie) are the most altered of <strong>Colorado</strong>’secosystems. Not surprisingly, rivers and streams of the Eastern Plains areidentifi ed as high-priority habitats of concern in <strong>Colorado</strong>’s State WildlifeAction Plan (CDOW 2006).Plains Working <strong>Forest</strong>s (Agroforestry)Scattered across the plains of <strong>Colorado</strong> are small acreages of forest thathave been planted for a variety of conservation purposes. Though designedand planted for specifi c purposes, these areas can be defi ned as workingforest lands that provide the same environmental services as the naturallyoccurring working forests. Their small size and wide distribution make itdiffi cult to include them in a statewide assessment, but their establishmenthas been a high priority since the plains were settled. These forests providea disproportionate benefi t to those that have chosen to live and/or make theirliving through agriculture on the plains.Since the Dust Bowl days of the 1930s, several state and federal programshave supported conservation tree and shrub plantings on both private andpublicly owned lands. Through a cooperative interagency program, morethan 200 living snow fences were planted along county, state and federalroads in <strong>Colorado</strong> to keep snow from drifting onto roadways. These werepurposely designed to provide multiple benefi ts such as livestock protection,erosion control and wildlife habitat enhancement. Several are located onthe Pawnee National Grasslands. <strong>Colorado</strong> Division of Wildlife and localPheasants Forever chapters worked together to establish more than 1,350windbreak/shrub thicket combination plantings to benefi t the economicallyimportant ring-necked pheasant population. A signifi cant proportion of theearly Stewardship Incentives Program, Agricultural Conservation Program andGreat Plains Conservation Program funding provided cost-share to privatelandowners to establish windbreaks, shelterbelts and habitat plantings on theplains.Presently, the Continuous Conservation Reserve Program provides incentivesfor establishing livestock and farmstead shelterbelts, fi eld windbreaks andliving snow fences on crop land, in addition to riparian forest buffers oncrop land and pasture land adjacent to water courses and water bodies.13
- Page 1 and 2: Colorado Statewide ForestResource A
- Page 3: Table of ContentsI. Executive Summa
- Page 6 and 7: II.BackgroundThe Colorado Statewide
- Page 8 and 9: National Guidance for Statewide For
- Page 10 and 11: III. Overview of Colorado’s Fores
- Page 12 and 13: Spruce-Fir 9Spruce-fi r is among th
- Page 14 and 15: Mixed Conifer 14The mixed conifer f
- Page 18 and 19: Windbreaks, shelterbelts and their
- Page 20 and 21: Owner Spruce-Fir Lodgepole Aspen Mi
- Page 22 and 23: forest management costs per acre ha
- Page 24 and 25: include standard ownership data and
- Page 26 and 27: The second metric is an estimate of
- Page 28 and 29: Map 4 - Colorado Forest Legacy Area
- Page 30 and 31: NATIONAL THEME: Protect Forests fro
- Page 32 and 33: Map 7 - Wildland Fire Susceptibilit
- Page 34 and 35: Map 8 - Wildland Fire Intensity Ind
- Page 36 and 37: ot (CSFS 2001 and 2002). Some insec
- Page 38 and 39: Map 10 - Insect and Disease Mitigat
- Page 40 and 41: is legally mandated, as well as dal
- Page 42 and 43: change, including species extinctio
- Page 44 and 45: transport of materi als that can ad
- Page 46 and 47: Map 15 - Post-Fire Erosion RiskMap
- Page 48 and 49: environment, many homes and other s
- Page 50 and 51: Owner 0.5 mile 1 mile 2 mile TotalU
- Page 52 and 53: Map 18 - Wildland-Urban Interface w
- Page 54 and 55: Map 20 - Wildland-Urban Interface w
- Page 56 and 57: They also are important partners in
- Page 58 and 59: Forest TypeAcres for Wood Products
- Page 60 and 61: of fragmentation to help forest man
- Page 62 and 63: Forest Type Low Moderate High Very
- Page 64 and 65: Map 25 - Important Habitat for Econ
- Page 66 and 67:
ACRESImp. Habitat for Econ.Imp. Spe
- Page 68 and 69:
Forest Type Low Moderate High Very
- Page 70 and 71:
Map 28 - Community Forestry Opportu
- Page 72 and 73:
Enhance Public Benefits from Trees
- Page 78 and 79:
VI. ReferencesAlexander, K. [Intern
- Page 80 and 81:
Neely, B., Comer, P., Moritz, C., L
- Page 82 and 83:
VII. Statewide Assessment Steering
- Page 84 and 85:
APPENDIX A - Colorado Statewide For
- Page 86 and 87:
• Identify and conserve high prio
- Page 88 and 89:
assessments and resource strategies
- Page 90 and 91:
National Theme: Protect Forests fro
- Page 92 and 93:
Protect, conserve, and enhance wild
- Page 94:
States are encouraged to draw from