13.07.2015 Views

GirosMex SA de CV

GirosMex SA de CV

GirosMex SA de CV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e paid by Electronic Funds Transfer within ten (10) days of entry of the Judgment and Conviction.DEFENDANT'S WAIVER OF RIGHTS26. In entering this agreement, the <strong>de</strong>fendant acknowledges and un<strong>de</strong>rstands that in sodoing it surren<strong>de</strong>rs any claims it may have raised in any pretrial motion, as well as certain rightswhich inclu<strong>de</strong> the following:a. If the <strong>de</strong>fendant persisted in a plea of not guilty to the charge against it, the<strong>de</strong>fendant would be entitled to a speedy and public trial by a court or jury. The<strong>de</strong>fendant has a right to a jury trial. However, in or<strong>de</strong>r that the trial beconducted by the judge sitting without a jury, the <strong>de</strong>fendant, the governmentand the judge all must agree that the trial be conducted by the judge withouta jury.b.c.If the trial is a jury trial, the jury would be composed of twelve citizensselected at random. The <strong>de</strong>fendant and its attorney would have a say in whothejurors would be by removing prospective jurors for cause where actual biasor other disqualification is shown, or without cause by exercising peremptorychallenges. The jury would have to agree unanimously before it could returna verdict of guilty. The court would instruct the jury that the <strong>de</strong>fendant ispresumed innocent until such time, if ever, as the government establishes guiltby competent evi<strong>de</strong>nce to the satisfaction of the jury beyond a reasonabledoubt.If the trial is held by the judge without a jury, the judge would find the factsand <strong>de</strong>termine, after hearing all of the evi<strong>de</strong>nce, whether or not he waspersua<strong>de</strong>d of <strong>de</strong>fendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.d. At such trial, whether by a judge or a jury, the government would be requiredto present witnesses and other evi<strong>de</strong>nce against the <strong>de</strong>fendant. The <strong>de</strong>fendantwould be able to confront witnesses upon whose testimony the government isrelying to obtain a conviction and the <strong>de</strong>fendant's counsel would have theright to cross-examine those witnesses. In turn the <strong>de</strong>fendant could, but is notobligated to, present witnesses and other evi<strong>de</strong>nce on its own behalf. The<strong>de</strong>fendant would be entitled to compulsory process to call witnesses.27. The <strong>de</strong>fendant, by its duly authorized representative, acknowledges and un<strong>de</strong>rstandsthat by pleading guilty the <strong>de</strong>fendant is waiving all the rights set forth above. The <strong>de</strong>fendant furtherCase 2:08-cr-00062-RTR Filed 02/25/08 Page 7 of 17 Document 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!