13.07.2015 Views

Power Grid Analysis in VLSI Designs - SERC

Power Grid Analysis in VLSI Designs - SERC

Power Grid Analysis in VLSI Designs - SERC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Circuit%Drop <strong>in</strong>average activity%Drop <strong>in</strong> Tim<strong>in</strong>gW<strong>in</strong>dow ApproachSPICE%Drop100 Inverter Cha<strong>in</strong> 1.65 6 132 Bit Shift Register 17.5 40 1216 Bit Adder 31 NA 19.16Table 4.2 Comparison of percentage peak <strong>in</strong>stantaneous IR dropIt is clear that the accuracy of the Average Activity method is better than Tim<strong>in</strong>g W<strong>in</strong>dowmethod. To check the performance of this approach, Average Activity method was applied to afew <strong>in</strong>dustry standard circuits. Table 4.3 below shows the comparison of the maximumDynamic IR Drop <strong>in</strong> a circuit us<strong>in</strong>g average switch<strong>in</strong>g activity and <strong>Power</strong> Mill. <strong>Power</strong> Mill is aSPICE based transient analysis tool offered by Synopsys. It is now called Nano Sim.circuit %V Drop us<strong>in</strong>g avg activity %Vdrop <strong>in</strong> <strong>Power</strong> Mill %Errors27 4.5 5.8 -22.4138s344 6.3 6.6 -4.54545s349 6.2 7.5 -17.3333s444 8.6 13.3 -35.3383s1238 13.4 13.3 0.75188s298 12.5 15 -16.6667Table 4.3 Comparison of percentage peak IR drop on ISCAS89 circuits85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!