ANNUAL REPORT INTRUM JUSTITIA A N N U A L R EP O R T 2 0 ...
ANNUAL REPORT INTRUM JUSTITIA A N N U A L R EP O R T 2 0 ...
ANNUAL REPORT INTRUM JUSTITIA A N N U A L R EP O R T 2 0 ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
60<br />
Notes<br />
NOTE 4<br />
D<strong>EP</strong>RECIATION<br />
NOTE 5<br />
PARTICIPATIONS IN ASSOCIATED COMPANIES<br />
NOTE 6<br />
fINANCIAL INCOME<br />
GROUP PARENT COMPANY<br />
SEK M 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />
Capitalized expenditure for IT<br />
development<br />
–104.6 –84.7 -0.2 -0.3<br />
Client relationships –14.5 –21.8 – –<br />
Other intangibles –11.0 –9.8 – –<br />
Computer hardware –25.3 –29.7 -0.1 0.0<br />
Other tangible fixed assets –16.0 –18.9 0.0 –0.1<br />
Total –171.4 –164.9 –0.3 –0.4<br />
Depreciation has been charged to each function as an operating expense<br />
as follows:<br />
GROUP PARENT COMPANY<br />
SEK M 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />
Cost of sales –152.8 –147.8 – –<br />
Sales and marketing<br />
expenses<br />
–4.9 –5.2 – –<br />
General and administrative<br />
expenses<br />
–13.7 –11.9 –0.3 –0.4<br />
Total –171.4 –164.9 –0.3 –0.4<br />
GROUP<br />
SEK M 2010 2009<br />
Motus ehf (formerly Intrum á<br />
Íslandi), Reykjavik (Iceland)<br />
–1.7 0.3<br />
IJCOF SAS, Lyon (France) 3.4 –<br />
Total 1.7 0.3<br />
GROUP PARENT COMPANY<br />
SEK M 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />
Interest income from<br />
Group companies<br />
– – 74.0 153.9<br />
Other interest income 8.2 9.5 3.1 1.6<br />
Dividends from Group companies – – 211.3 83.5<br />
Distribution received<br />
on other shares<br />
2.9 – – –<br />
Result from intra-Group<br />
share transactions<br />
– – – 1 150.8<br />
Total 11.1 9.5 288.4 1 389.8<br />
The Parent Company’s result from the intra-Group share transaction during<br />
2009 relates to the profit from the sale of shares in Intrum NV, Belgium, to<br />
group company Fair Pay Please AB. The sale was made at estimated market<br />
value.<br />
Other shares received relate to payment obtained in connection with the<br />
liquidation of Netgiro International AB.<br />
Operating earnings include interest income attributable to purchased debt<br />
amounting to SEK 811.6 M (918.6), defined as the difference between the<br />
year’s collected amount and amortization for the year. Amortization comprises<br />
the portion of the cost of the portfolio that, owing to allocation under the<br />
effective interest method, accrues over the current year.<br />
NOTE 7<br />
fINANCIAL EXPENSES<br />
NOTE 8<br />
KONCERNEN MODERBOLAGET<br />
SEK M 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />
Interest expenses to<br />
Group companies<br />
– – –16.9 –131.6<br />
Interest expenses –70.7 –72.2 –68.6 –68.3<br />
Exchange rate differences –8.6 4.8 –0.7 5.3<br />
Amortization of capitalized<br />
borrowing costs<br />
–14.0 –1.7 –14.0 –1.7<br />
Impairment of shares<br />
in subsidiaries<br />
– – –462.1 –25.7<br />
Other financial expenses –9.1 –20.2 –8.1 –2.1<br />
Total –102.4 –89.3 –570.4 –224.1<br />
Exchange rate differences from accounts receivable and accounts payable<br />
are reported in operating earnings. The amounts were negligible.<br />
TAX<br />
Pretax earnings and the tax charge for the year for Swedish and foreign<br />
operations were as follows:<br />
SEK M<br />
Earnings before tax<br />
2010<br />
GROUP<br />
2009<br />
Sweden 18.8 –81.0<br />
Other countries 620.5 669.4<br />
Total<br />
Current tax<br />
639.3 588.4<br />
Sweden 1.9 –18.8<br />
Other countries<br />
Deferred tax<br />
–163.3 –144.7<br />
Sweden –33.3 –47.8<br />
Other countries 7.4 63.5<br />
Total –187.3 –147.8<br />
The tax expense for the year includes two significant items attributable to<br />
previous years.<br />
The tax dispute in Finland, details of which were given in the company’s<br />
previous annual reports, came to a conclusion in 2010, with the Supreme<br />
Administrative Court in Finland refusing the company leave to appeal. This<br />
means that the ruling from the lower court, which was not in favor of the<br />
company, still stands. The dispute concerned, among other things, the deductibility<br />
of interest expenses in a holding company after a restructuring of<br />
the Group in connection with a change to loan financing after its delisting<br />
from the London Stock Exchange in 1998. As a result of the ruling, the<br />
company has paid and expensed additional tax for 1999-2002 of SEK 41.8<br />
M, including a tax surcharge of SEK 21.5 M. The company has appealed the<br />
tax surcharge.<br />
During the year, the Group’s Swedish subsidiary was refunded SEK 14.0 M<br />
in taxes that had been expensed in 2009. The background to the transaction<br />
is the group contributions that were paid to the Group’s Italian companies<br />
in 2006 and 2007, according to a preliminary ruling based on the European<br />
Court’s Marks and Spencer case. According to a decision from the Swedish<br />
Supreme Administrative Court in 2009, the transfer to Italy was not tax<br />
deductible, but at the request of the company, the tax authority reviewed the<br />
taxation in 2010. This resulted in the amount being reclassified as a group<br />
contribution to the Parent Company, which means that it can be partially<br />
offset against loss carryforwards, for which no deferred tax assets have been<br />
recognized.<br />
Intrum Justitia AB is seated in Sweden where the nominal corporate tax<br />
rate is 26.3 procent. The Group has operations in 22 countries in Europe,<br />
with various tax rates. The following reconciliation explains the deviation<br />
between the Group’s actual tax cost and the expetcted tax cost following a<br />
corporate tax rate of 26.3 percent: