03.12.2012 Views

ANNUAL REPORT INTRUM JUSTITIA A N N U A L R EP O R T 2 0 ...

ANNUAL REPORT INTRUM JUSTITIA A N N U A L R EP O R T 2 0 ...

ANNUAL REPORT INTRUM JUSTITIA A N N U A L R EP O R T 2 0 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60<br />

Notes<br />

NOTE 4<br />

D<strong>EP</strong>RECIATION<br />

NOTE 5<br />

PARTICIPATIONS IN ASSOCIATED COMPANIES<br />

NOTE 6<br />

fINANCIAL INCOME<br />

GROUP PARENT COMPANY<br />

SEK M 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />

Capitalized expenditure for IT<br />

development<br />

–104.6 –84.7 -0.2 -0.3<br />

Client relationships –14.5 –21.8 – –<br />

Other intangibles –11.0 –9.8 – –<br />

Computer hardware –25.3 –29.7 -0.1 0.0<br />

Other tangible fixed assets –16.0 –18.9 0.0 –0.1<br />

Total –171.4 –164.9 –0.3 –0.4<br />

Depreciation has been charged to each function as an operating expense<br />

as follows:<br />

GROUP PARENT COMPANY<br />

SEK M 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />

Cost of sales –152.8 –147.8 – –<br />

Sales and marketing<br />

expenses<br />

–4.9 –5.2 – –<br />

General and administrative<br />

expenses<br />

–13.7 –11.9 –0.3 –0.4<br />

Total –171.4 –164.9 –0.3 –0.4<br />

GROUP<br />

SEK M 2010 2009<br />

Motus ehf (formerly Intrum á<br />

Íslandi), Reykjavik (Iceland)<br />

–1.7 0.3<br />

IJCOF SAS, Lyon (France) 3.4 –<br />

Total 1.7 0.3<br />

GROUP PARENT COMPANY<br />

SEK M 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />

Interest income from<br />

Group companies<br />

– – 74.0 153.9<br />

Other interest income 8.2 9.5 3.1 1.6<br />

Dividends from Group companies – – 211.3 83.5<br />

Distribution received<br />

on other shares<br />

2.9 – – –<br />

Result from intra-Group<br />

share transactions<br />

– – – 1 150.8<br />

Total 11.1 9.5 288.4 1 389.8<br />

The Parent Company’s result from the intra-Group share transaction during<br />

2009 relates to the profit from the sale of shares in Intrum NV, Belgium, to<br />

group company Fair Pay Please AB. The sale was made at estimated market<br />

value.<br />

Other shares received relate to payment obtained in connection with the<br />

liquidation of Netgiro International AB.<br />

Operating earnings include interest income attributable to purchased debt<br />

amounting to SEK 811.6 M (918.6), defined as the difference between the<br />

year’s collected amount and amortization for the year. Amortization comprises<br />

the portion of the cost of the portfolio that, owing to allocation under the<br />

effective interest method, accrues over the current year.<br />

NOTE 7<br />

fINANCIAL EXPENSES<br />

NOTE 8<br />

KONCERNEN MODERBOLAGET<br />

SEK M 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />

Interest expenses to<br />

Group companies<br />

– – –16.9 –131.6<br />

Interest expenses –70.7 –72.2 –68.6 –68.3<br />

Exchange rate differences –8.6 4.8 –0.7 5.3<br />

Amortization of capitalized<br />

borrowing costs<br />

–14.0 –1.7 –14.0 –1.7<br />

Impairment of shares<br />

in subsidiaries<br />

– – –462.1 –25.7<br />

Other financial expenses –9.1 –20.2 –8.1 –2.1<br />

Total –102.4 –89.3 –570.4 –224.1<br />

Exchange rate differences from accounts receivable and accounts payable<br />

are reported in operating earnings. The amounts were negligible.<br />

TAX<br />

Pretax earnings and the tax charge for the year for Swedish and foreign<br />

operations were as follows:<br />

SEK M<br />

Earnings before tax<br />

2010<br />

GROUP<br />

2009<br />

Sweden 18.8 –81.0<br />

Other countries 620.5 669.4<br />

Total<br />

Current tax<br />

639.3 588.4<br />

Sweden 1.9 –18.8<br />

Other countries<br />

Deferred tax<br />

–163.3 –144.7<br />

Sweden –33.3 –47.8<br />

Other countries 7.4 63.5<br />

Total –187.3 –147.8<br />

The tax expense for the year includes two significant items attributable to<br />

previous years.<br />

The tax dispute in Finland, details of which were given in the company’s<br />

previous annual reports, came to a conclusion in 2010, with the Supreme<br />

Administrative Court in Finland refusing the company leave to appeal. This<br />

means that the ruling from the lower court, which was not in favor of the<br />

company, still stands. The dispute concerned, among other things, the deductibility<br />

of interest expenses in a holding company after a restructuring of<br />

the Group in connection with a change to loan financing after its delisting<br />

from the London Stock Exchange in 1998. As a result of the ruling, the<br />

company has paid and expensed additional tax for 1999-2002 of SEK 41.8<br />

M, including a tax surcharge of SEK 21.5 M. The company has appealed the<br />

tax surcharge.<br />

During the year, the Group’s Swedish subsidiary was refunded SEK 14.0 M<br />

in taxes that had been expensed in 2009. The background to the transaction<br />

is the group contributions that were paid to the Group’s Italian companies<br />

in 2006 and 2007, according to a preliminary ruling based on the European<br />

Court’s Marks and Spencer case. According to a decision from the Swedish<br />

Supreme Administrative Court in 2009, the transfer to Italy was not tax<br />

deductible, but at the request of the company, the tax authority reviewed the<br />

taxation in 2010. This resulted in the amount being reclassified as a group<br />

contribution to the Parent Company, which means that it can be partially<br />

offset against loss carryforwards, for which no deferred tax assets have been<br />

recognized.<br />

Intrum Justitia AB is seated in Sweden where the nominal corporate tax<br />

rate is 26.3 procent. The Group has operations in 22 countries in Europe,<br />

with various tax rates. The following reconciliation explains the deviation<br />

between the Group’s actual tax cost and the expetcted tax cost following a<br />

corporate tax rate of 26.3 percent:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!