<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Element</strong> Needs AssessmentTable 28: Summary of Existing <strong>Housing</strong> NeedOverpaying Households 2000 Special Needs Group 2000Renter 56% Elderly Households 8,785Owner 41% Disabled Persons 10%Developmentally Disabled Persons 1%-3%Overpaying Households by Income: Large Households 29%Extremely Low Income (0-30% AMI) 80% Female Headed Households 16%Very Low Income (31-50% AMI) 71% Female Headed Households with Children 7%Low Income (51-80% AMI) 53% Farmworkers 229Overcrowding 2000RenterHomeless 46024% Units At-RiskOwner 11% Units At-Risk 528Total 16%Source: Census 2010, Census 2010 ACS5-Year Estimates, HUD Comprehensive <strong>Housing</strong> Affordability Strategy (CHAS),2005-2009Note: Percentages represent percent of the total population.CHAS data, developed by the Census for HUD, provides detailed information on housing needs(e.g., housing cost burden) by income level for different types of households in <strong>Garden</strong> <strong>Grove</strong>.Table 29 shows the percentage of households who experience cost burden and other “housingproblems”. For the CHAS data, HUD defines housing problems to include:• Units with physical defects (lacking complete kitchen or bathroom)• Households living in overcrowded conditions (housing units with more than one person perroom)• Households experiencing housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 30% of grossincome• Households experiencing severe housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 50% ofgross incomeSpecific households in <strong>Garden</strong> <strong>Grove</strong> had disproportionate housing needs. In general, renterhouseholdshad a higher level of housing problems (67%) compared to owner households (55%).Among elderly renter-households in the City, 71% experienced one or more housing problems.Most large renter families (86%) experienced one or more housing problems, the highest rateamong all other groups.<strong>2014</strong>-<strong>2021</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Element</strong> 34 City of <strong>Garden</strong> <strong>Grove</strong>
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Element</strong> Needs AssessmentTable 29: <strong>Housing</strong> Assistance Needs of Low and Moderate Income HouseholdsHousehold by Type, Income,and <strong>Housing</strong> ProblemRentersSmallFamiliesLargeFamiliesTotalRenters ElderlySmallFamiliesOwnersLargeFamiliesTotalOwnersTotalHhlds.ElderlyExtremely Low-Income(0-30% MFI) 1,380 2,660 930 5,715 890 815 280 2,290 8,005with any housing problems 78% 89% 99% 85% 61% 84% 84% 74% 82%with cost burden > 30% 78% 86% 95% 83% 60% 75% 84% 71% 80%with cost burden > 50% 64% 75% 79% 71% 46% 71% 63% 59% 67%Very Low-Income (31-50% MFI) 325 1,805 1,225 3,930 1,045 1,370 810 3,725 7,655with any housing problems 82% 94% 96% 90% 38% 81% 93% 64% 78%with cost burden > 30% 77% 88% 80% 82% 38% 78% 78% 59% 71%with cost burden > 50% 32% 28% 17% 26% 23% 59% 53% 43% 35%Low-Income (51-80% MFI) 220 1,855 875 3,445 1,310 2,285 1,735 5,795 9,240with any housing problems 57% 57% 89% 66% 27% 71% 82% 64% 65%with cost burden > 30% 47% 46% 29% 44% 27% 71% 63% 58% 53%with cost burden > 50% 2% 5% 0% 3% 8% 31% 28% 26% 18%Moderate-Income (81% + MFI) 165 2,450 870 4,465 2,305 8,205 2,845 14,805 19,270with any housing problems 8% 19% 53% 25% 15% 28% 59% 32% 31%with cost burden > 30% 8% 9% 2% 8% 15% 27% 26% 25% 21%with cost burden > 50% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 4% 3%Total Households 2,090 8,770 3,900 17,555 5,550 12,675 5,670 26,615 44,170with any housing problems 71% 64% 86% 67% 30% 45% 72% 47% 55%with cost burden > 30% 69% 56% 55% 56% 29% 43% 47% 41% 47%with cost burden > 50% 47% 29% 24% 30% 15% 19% 21% 19% 23%Source: HUD Comprehensive <strong>Housing</strong> Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 2005-2009.Abbreviation: Hhds = Households.Note: Data presented in this table is based on special tabulations from sample Census data. The number ofhouseholds in each category usually deviates slightly from the 100% count due to the need to extrapolate sampledata out to total households. Interpretations of this data should focus on the proportion of households in need ofassistance rather than on precise numbers.Regional <strong>Housing</strong> Needs Allocation (RHNA)California General Plan law requires each city and county to have land zoned to accommodate itsfair share of the regional housing need. This share for the SCAG region is known as the Regional<strong>Housing</strong> Needs Allocation, or RHNA. HCD determined that the projected housing need for theSouthern California region (including the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, SanBernardino, Ventura, and Imperial) is 412,721 new housing units for the <strong>2014</strong>-<strong>2021</strong> planning period.SCAG allocated this projected growth to the various cities and unincorporated county areas withinthe SCAG region, creating the RHNA. The RHNA is divided into four categories: very low, low,moderate, and above moderate income. As determined by SCAG, the City of <strong>Garden</strong> <strong>Grove</strong>’s fairshare allocation is 747 new housing units during this planning cycle, with the units divided amongthe four income categories as shown in Table 30.City of <strong>Garden</strong> <strong>Grove</strong> 35 <strong>2014</strong>-<strong>2021</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Element</strong>