13.07.2015 Views

Kite Lines - Vol.1 No. 2 - KiteLife

Kite Lines - Vol.1 No. 2 - KiteLife

Kite Lines - Vol.1 No. 2 - KiteLife

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Multikite PhenomenonAND A HISTORY OFTHE WORLD RECORDBy Valerie GovigThe number of kites flown from oneline has been little documented untilthe last three years or so . Before that,there were no records kept of howmany disks had ever been flown in acentipede-which is, of course, a train .Centipede kites, though of a prescribedappearance and rigging, are essentiallya series of round kites flown in train,and they have been made and flownin Japan and China for an unknownnumber of decades .Multi-kite attempts, or at leastaccounts of them, have been few in theWest . One such appears in Jane Yolen'sbook, World on a String, telling ofCharles Lohsen of New Jersey, who in1949 lofted 108 kites on one line .Trains certainly had been done beforeWill Yolen came along in 1972and made multikiteflying freshlypopular . Yolen at the time was hungryfor new laurels to replace the verybrown ones he had worn so long fromhis kite fighting exploits in UttarPradesh, India . Those capers hadgiven him the cachet required forlaunching his then-new book, TheYoung Sportsman's Guide to <strong>Kite</strong> Flying.The book was out of print by 1972,and Yolen was ready to write a newone . He needed credentials, so in hisusual flamboyant style he set out tocreate them . He flew 50 kites and anempty champagne bottle from oneline at the Sarasota, FL, kite conteston January 15 . He claimed this brokehis own previous record of 30 kitesflown from one line at Adamant, VT,in 1962 . This claim not only wentundisputed, it was dressed up in someof the niftiest prose the papers hadseen in some time .Whether Yolen had intended it ornot, his feat inevitably attracted rivalry .William R . Bigge, of Washington, DC,decided to try a train of sleds . On June3, 1972, in Harpers Ferry, WV, he flew70 kites from a single, hand-held line .In contrast to Yolen's train of large,Hustler brand two-stickers, Bigge'ssleds were 9 in . x 12 in . and made ofclear polyethylene drop cloth, withstruts of plastic window blind slatting .Total pull was 8 to 10 lbs . The sledshad no vents . ("I claim a vent meansyour kite is too heavy," Bigge was wontto say.) All had been neatly stackedin a box in advance and were re-packedon retrieval . The operation wasengineered to be an economical, onemanjob from start to finish .The following January, Yolen triedagain . This time, 57 kites ; again, muchpublicity .Then on June 2, 1973, in HarpersFerry, Bigge doubled his ammunitionand flew 151 kites . For this occasionhe improved his method, massproducinghis sleds in a smaller size,only 3 .3 in . x 4 .4 in . each . Logically,to increase the number of kites youfly, you must reduce the size of thekites . Yolen's stock models ("real kites,"as he lamely protested) were a limitingBill Bigge's hands pull out pre-numbered kites like Jacks from a box .factor for him . Since Bigge made hisown craft, his only limits were practicalityof manufacture and balancein flight of his cobwebby little sleds .This time Bigge's story appeared inthe Baltimore Sun, and as reporter forthe Maryland <strong>Kite</strong> Society at the time,I followed up with a petition to Guinnessto include Bigge's record in thebook. Initial response was negativebecause no such category existed ; onlyaltitude and duration were recognized .Before long it was time for anotherJanuary fly in Sarasota, and Yolen wasat it again, this time to fly 178 kiteson one line, a distinct achievement .As usual, Yolen had oiled his publicitymachinery well beforehand, and thestory was everywhere-withoutreference to Bigge .<strong>No</strong>w in a fighting mood, Bigge cameback to Harpers Ferry in June, 1974,this time to fly 188 kites . It was a newrecord, achieved in unfavorably strongwind, but Bigge wanted to make a more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!