13.07.2015 Views

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78Mikael af Malmborgalso helped to release Finland from her tense position. It was furthermore arguedthat once associated with the EEC Swe<strong>de</strong>n would serve as a link for Finland toWestern Europe. If Swe<strong>de</strong>n was exclu<strong>de</strong>d from the Common Market she would bedamaged economically and be less able to give moral, material and political supportto Finland. This line <strong>of</strong> argument was also used by the British in <strong>de</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> theSwedish case. It was known that Presi<strong>de</strong>nt <strong>de</strong> Gaulle and other French army lea<strong>de</strong>rshad consi<strong>de</strong>rable sympathy and admiration for Finland because <strong>of</strong> her stand againstthe Soviet Union during the Winter War and Swedish diplomats and politicianswere not slow to try and pr<strong>of</strong>it from this fact in discussions with the French. 48The Finnish argument, however, might also rebound on Swe<strong>de</strong>n. The Americanswere not convinced by it and ten<strong>de</strong>d to turn it upsi<strong>de</strong> down: i.e. if Swe<strong>de</strong>nwere associated with the <strong>European</strong> Community, then Finland would really be left ina precarious position. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, the Finlan<strong>de</strong>rs themselves seemed to reasonin the same way. They were aiming at a satisfactory arrangement with the EECwithout antagonising the Russians, and this would be easier if Swe<strong>de</strong>n remainedoutsi<strong>de</strong> the Common Market. Finland wanted Swe<strong>de</strong>n to stay out. In this respectFinnish policy coinci<strong>de</strong>d with that <strong>of</strong> the United States. The maintenance <strong>of</strong> Finland’smarkets in Europe would present fewer difficulties if she were able toreceive the same sort <strong>of</strong> treatment from the EEC as Swe<strong>de</strong>n, since the latter wasFinland’s main competitor in international tra<strong>de</strong>. 49Neither Nor<strong>de</strong>k nor Skan<strong>de</strong>kAfter France’s second veto in 1967 the Nordic market was given a last chance,while waiting for a solution with the EEC. A plan for a Nordic economic communitywas worked out by a Danish Social Democratic Government, led by Jens OttoKrag, and actively launched by the newly elected Prime Minister Hilmar Baunsgaardand his non-socialist government at a Nordic Council meeting in February1968. This so called Nor<strong>de</strong>k plan drew more on the binding EEC mo<strong>de</strong>l than previousattempts, and comprised a customs union for industrial goods, fishery and agriculturalproduce, and common industrial, monetary, and fiscal policies.This time from the beginning the Finlan<strong>de</strong>rs participated fully in the negotiations.The Swedish interest rose markedly after <strong>de</strong> Gaulle’s withdrawal as Presi<strong>de</strong>ntin April 1969. Notably Ol<strong>of</strong> Palme, who succee<strong>de</strong>d Erlan<strong>de</strong>r as Prime Minister inAutumn, pushed the issue. Palme was himself quite pro-<strong>European</strong>, and he was anx-48. E.g. reference to a conversation between the Swedish Ambassador to France, Ragnar Kumlin, andCharles <strong>de</strong> Gaulle at the Elysée Palace, PRO, FO 371, vol. 164701 (615/76) Swe<strong>de</strong>n and the EEC,Gallagher to FO, February 23, 1962; cf. I. Hägglöf, p. 250.49. PRO, FO 371, vol. 164714 (615/325) Note by Mr Barrington on talk with Mr Talvitie <strong>of</strong> the FinnishEmbassy, Foreign Office, June 13, 1962.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!