Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

54Markus Schulteexports to Sweden might have been responsible for the stagnation in Germanexports to that country.All in all the export evidence suggests that the industry could be quite happywith the division between the EEC and EFTA. The fact that exports to France andItaly were those growing the most from mid-1959 is perfectly consistent with thefact that their tariffs on non-ferrous metal products on average were by far the highestin Europe. Hence their lowering within the EEC had a relatively large impact.As far as the specific tariffs of most of the EFTA countries are concerned, it is hardto assess their actual incidence. Yet the fact that their level did not change considerablyvis-à-vis imports from Germany and that the volume of EFTA production wasapparently not sufficient to replace them entirely with imports from Britain or othernon-EEC sources left the German position in these markets essentially untouched.Statistical evidence for imports of non-ferrous metal products from the EEC andEFTA shows very clearly that this branch of German industry was indeed veryhappy not to have to lower its tariffs vis-à-vis the EFTA members. Given that thetariff levels on these products were relatively high in Germany, their lowering visà-visthe other EEC members led to a shooting up of imports from these countriesin the second quarter of 1959. This is not only true for imports from the EEC as awhole, but also for imports from all individual member countries. Imports fromEFTA, which continued to be hit by tariffs of the same order of magnitude, keptfollowing the 1953-58 trend for the rest of the period.Non-ferrous Metal Products – ImportsImports of non-ferrous metal products from the UK stagnated and remained wellbelow the rising 1953-58 trend, while imports from Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark,Austria and Norway exceeded the trend after 1959.The value of imports from these countries remained however relatively low,with the combined imports of the Benelux countries exceeding the total importsfrom EFTA.Given the steep increase in imports from the other EEC member countries, thereduction of tariffs vis-à-vis the Seven would very likely have had a similar effectfor imports from there, mainly from the UK. From the point of view of the Germanindustry, the fact that imports from Britain stagnated and remained very far belowthe 1953-58 trend must have been seen as a major success. There was certainlynothing that could have induced the industry to agree to any changes in tariff protectionvis-à-vis the Seven which might have endangered that advantageous situation.Given that the EFTA countries had low or zero tariffs on the primary products,while the CET rendered them more expensive for the industries within the EEC, anumber of complicated issues would be in the way of any solution that could havebeen agreed to by the German non-ferrous metal processing industry. The creationof a Europe-wide free trade area would not only have resulted in stronger importpressureson the German market, but would surely have reduced the gains that the