13.07.2015 Views

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Industrial Interest in West Germany´s Decision 49German foreign tra<strong>de</strong> statistics. All in all, the tra<strong>de</strong> discrimination that occurredbetween the EEC and EFTA did not seem to lead to important changes in thesources <strong>of</strong> imports for the Seven. This might have been partly due to long establishedtra<strong>de</strong> relations, to geographic proximity and correspondingly low transportcosts, but most probably to the fact that the markets were regulated by other<strong>de</strong>vices. It could also have been due to the fact that production capacity withinEFTA would not have been sufficient to cause a substantial switch from Germanyor in<strong>de</strong>ed from any other EEC supplier country to Britain as the most importanttextile producer among the Seven.Textile <strong>–</strong> ImportsFor imports the picture is quite similar to that <strong>of</strong> exports with a little slump in 1958and 1959, a rise above the trend for the EEC and a line close to the 1953-58 trendfor imports from EFTA. However, it is important to note that the balance <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>de</strong>with the EFTA countries is persistently positive, while with the EEC it becomesincreasingly negative particularly from mid-1959 when the first internal tariffmeasures showed their effect. The most important source <strong>of</strong> imports among theEEC members was Italy, closely followed by France. The value <strong>of</strong> imports fromFrance almost doubled from the first to the last quarter <strong>of</strong> 1959. On a slightly lowerlevel, imports from the Benelux countries rose markedly above the 1953-58 trendtoo, contributing to a very strong negative balance <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>de</strong> in textiles for Germanywith its partners in the EEC.Textile imports from the EEC rose markedly, whereas imports from the EFTAcountries roughly followed the 1953-58 trend, and remained below it during most<strong>of</strong> the second half <strong>of</strong> the period. Imports from the UK continued to stagnate after1958 and stayed well below the trend. Switzerland remained the most importantsource <strong>of</strong> textile imports among the Seven, followed by the UK and Austria. Themost significant <strong>de</strong>velopment was the complete stagnation <strong>of</strong> imports from Britainafter 1957.While it is hard to specify to which protective measures this stagnation was due,it seems that the failure to establish the free tra<strong>de</strong> area and to admit Britain into theEEC saved the German textile industry from potentially very damaging competition.Had the free tra<strong>de</strong> area come about in 1958/59, a “take <strong>of</strong>f” <strong>of</strong> imports fromBritain together with the rise <strong>of</strong> imports from France and Italy would undoubtedlyhave had a strong negative impact on the German textile industry. One factor in thatwould certainly have been textile imports into the UK from the Commonwealth aswell as the UK textiles ma<strong>de</strong> from Indian “grey cloth” or re-exports from HongKong.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!