13.07.2015 Views

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

Journal of European Integration History – Revue d'histoire de l'

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Industrial Interest in West Germany´s Decision 47Lanka, if they were to achieve even the slightest reduction in tra<strong>de</strong> impediments fortheir exports to the <strong>European</strong> market. For reasons <strong>of</strong> very advantageous factorendowments or very low labour costs, competition in these sectors was seen asunfair and protection was <strong>de</strong>man<strong>de</strong>d. The German textile industry assumed that itsown protective interests vis-à-vis the Asian countries mentioned would be sharedby other <strong>European</strong> industries and that hence agreement on quantitative restrictionsagainst imports from there would easily be reached with the other <strong>European</strong> countries.During the accession negotiations these Asian countries in fact were grantedlarger quotas on the <strong>European</strong> market. Apart from the Asian competition the associations<strong>of</strong> the textile industry feared that the divisions between EEC and EFTAmight endanger their very important export markets in the Seven and primarily theScandinavian countries.As before, statistical evi<strong>de</strong>nce will be used to assess on the one hand whetherthe expectations <strong>of</strong> the individual sectors were met by the <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>de</strong> andon the other hand to what extent opportunity costs and losses were visible and tangiblefor the industry and on which markets these costs and losses occurred.Textiles <strong>–</strong> ExportsAll <strong>European</strong> textile producers faced powerful competition from the <strong>de</strong>velopingcountries whose sales in Western Europe were entirely controlled by quotas. It wasnot therefore competitiveness that <strong>de</strong>termined their patterns but tra<strong>de</strong> agreements.The problem was that the UK appeared to give the best tra<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>als to India, Pakistanand Hong Kong. For the West German textile industry combined textileexports to the EEC and EFTA lie consistently below the imports from those countries.Toward the end <strong>of</strong> the period both imports and exports begin to grow moresteeply than before. These increases are however due only to tra<strong>de</strong> with the otherEEC member countries, while tra<strong>de</strong> with the EFTA countries largely follows the1953-58 trend also during the rest <strong>of</strong> the period. The value <strong>of</strong> exports to the EFTAmarkets in the years up to 1963 is persistently higher than those to the EEC. Until1959 exports to EFTA continuously more than double those to the rest <strong>of</strong> the Community.From 1959 onward exports to the EEC rise sharply to reach and surpass thevalue <strong>of</strong> exports to EFTA by 1964. Thus the increased export potential <strong>of</strong>fered tothe German textile industry in the common market countries was not at all visibleat the time when the Maudling negotiations were un<strong>de</strong>r way. Instead, the fall inexports to both the EEC and the Seven in 1958, with figures remaining below the1953-58 trend well into 1959, did not suggest that there were any improvements onthe horizon, if tra<strong>de</strong> with the Seven should be affected by tariff discrimination.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!