120Fernando Guirao«Mr Presi<strong>de</strong>nt,»I have the honour to request on behalf <strong>of</strong> my Government the opening <strong>of</strong> negotiationsaimed at studying the possible connection <strong>of</strong> my country with the <strong>European</strong>Economic Community in the manner which may be more convenient for ourmutual interests.»Spain's <strong>European</strong> vocation, unceasingly confirmed all along her history, findsyet another opportunity to make itself apparent at the moment when the progresstowards integration is making a reality <strong>of</strong> the i<strong>de</strong>al <strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong> solidarity.»The territorial continuity <strong>of</strong> my country with the Community and the contributionthat its geographical situation can make in favour <strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong> cohesion are thereasons that lead my Government to request an association which may in due timebe transformed into full integration. This would take place after having gonethrough the necessary stages so as to adapt the Spanish economy to the stipulations<strong>of</strong> the Common Market.»As my Government is concerned with the task <strong>of</strong> accelerating the economic<strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>of</strong> the nation, it is convinced that the requirements <strong>of</strong> such a policywill be duly taken into account by the Community so that, as it is to be expected,Spain's connection, far from representing an obstacle, will be on the contrary anincentive towards the achievement <strong>of</strong> that goal. The success <strong>of</strong> the Spanish stabilisationprogramme, attained with the cooperation <strong>of</strong> international organisations signifiesan encouraging experience.»Moreover and bearing in mind that agricultural exports to the members <strong>of</strong> theCommunity represent a fundamental sector <strong>of</strong> Spanish foreign tra<strong>de</strong>, whose maintenanceand even increase is <strong>of</strong> the utmost importance so as to have the necessarymeans <strong>of</strong> payment without which our <strong>de</strong>velopment would be hampered, my Governmenthas no doubt that this issue will be duly taken into account in the hope thatsatisfactory solutions will be found for all concerned.»I consi<strong>de</strong>r it most interesting to point out that my Government is convincedthat the ties that bind Spain to the countries <strong>of</strong> the American continent will not beweakened by our integration in the Community. On the contrary, such ties can representa positive contribution to the resolution <strong>of</strong> the existing problems <strong>of</strong> complementaryeconomies between those countries and the Community.»For all these reasons I hope, Mr Presi<strong>de</strong>nt, that the Authorities <strong>of</strong> the Communitywill consi<strong>de</strong>r favourably the petition to open negotiations which I am presenting.In the meantime, please accept the assurances <strong>of</strong> my high esteem.Fernando M.ª Castiella»
Dieses Dokument wur<strong>de</strong> erstellt mit FrameMaker 4.0.4.Book reviews <strong>–</strong> Comptes rendus <strong>–</strong> Buchbesprechungen 121Book reviews <strong>–</strong> Comptes rendus <strong>–</strong> BuchbesprechungenClifford P. HACKETT (ed.). <strong>–</strong> Monnet and the Americans. The father <strong>of</strong> a unitedEurope and his US supporters. Washington D.C., Jean Monnet Council, 1995, 268 p. <strong>–</strong>ISBN 09642541-0-7. <strong>–</strong> 1464,00 FBThe purpose <strong>of</strong> this collection <strong>of</strong> essays, according to its editor and well-known scholar <strong>of</strong>Jean Monnet, Clifford Hackett, is a mo<strong>de</strong>st one; Monnet and the Americans concentrates onsome <strong>of</strong> Jean Monnet's links with American individuals throughout his long and remarkablecareer and the significance <strong>of</strong> these relationships for US and <strong>European</strong> affairs, the keymoments <strong>of</strong> which inclu<strong>de</strong>d the Schuman Plan, the <strong>European</strong> Defence Community episo<strong>de</strong>and the Euratom project. As Hackett acknowledges in the introduction, this aspect formsonly part <strong>of</strong> a larger story but “one that nee<strong>de</strong>d to be told by itself”. Unsurprisingly, therefore,the eight contributions cover little new ground beyond that which has been extensivelytilled by the two recent Monnet biographies, François Duchêne's Jean Monnet, the firstStatesman <strong>of</strong> Inter<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce (London, 1994) and Eric Rousse<strong>l'</strong>s Jean Monnet, 1888-1979(Paris, 1996) and appear to be directed primarily toward a US rea<strong>de</strong>rship. The merit <strong>of</strong> thecollection is that it draws together in one volume accounts <strong>of</strong> the principal relationshipsbetween Monnet and key American individuals which have been sketched either in memoirs(as in the case <strong>of</strong> David DiLeo's subject George Ball) or in comprehensive biographicalstudies (such as Thomas Schwartz’s America’s Germany: John J. McCloy and the Fe<strong>de</strong>ralRepublic <strong>of</strong> Germany (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1991) and Douglas Brinkley's, After theCreation: Dean Acheson and American Foreign Policy, 1953-71 (New Haven, CT, 1991).Inevitably, this results in a <strong>de</strong>gree <strong>of</strong> repetition and overlap from chapter to chapter but therea<strong>de</strong>r can build a comprehensive picture <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> Monnet's network <strong>of</strong> US relationshipsand the <strong>de</strong>gree to which he employed these individuals in pursuit <strong>of</strong> his objectives.Richard Mayne provi<strong>de</strong>s an introductory biographical essay which leads on to more<strong>de</strong>tailed studies <strong>of</strong> particular relationships. Don Cook's contribution “Monnet and the AmericanPress” is essentially a testimony <strong>of</strong> the contacts Monnet assiduously cultivated with theprincipal US correspon<strong>de</strong>nts in Europe, among them Walter Lippmann, James Reston andTheodore H. White. A rough chronological or<strong>de</strong>r is maintained tracing Monnet's mostimportant relationships through successive US administrations. This approach illustrates thetenacity with which Monnet pursued contacts that would permit access to the highestsources <strong>of</strong> <strong>de</strong>cision-making in government. Hackett's own essay points to the relationshipsMonnet <strong>de</strong>veloped in his pre-war visits to Washington with Felix Frankfurter, Hans Morgenthauand Harry Hopkins while trying to convince the Roosevelt administration to sellAmerican aircraft to France. This account records the suspicion with which many in the USgovernment (not least in the Treasury and State Departments) initially viewed l’Inspirateur:it was only in 1949, with the appointment <strong>of</strong> Dean Acheson as Secretary <strong>of</strong> State, that Monnet'sinfluence in US State Department policy-making really began to take root. It was toreach its apogee in the next administration, where he could number Presi<strong>de</strong>nt Eisenhoweramong his contacts and had Secretary <strong>of</strong> State John Foster Dulles as one <strong>of</strong> his ol<strong>de</strong>st andclosest confidants and lasted into the Kennedy administration. The gradual wi<strong>de</strong>ning and<strong>de</strong>epening <strong>of</strong> Monnet's US network (to use a suitably <strong>European</strong> phrase) goes some way toexplaining the extraordinary resilience <strong>of</strong> his influence among “pragmatic” (a <strong>de</strong>scriptionfavoured by all the authors) US policy-makers.The authors are reluctant to cast a critical eye on either Monnet or his US contacts <strong>–</strong> Brinkleymerely acknowledges that Monnet's dogged pursuit <strong>of</strong> Euratom and his scepticismabout the EEC in 1956-57 led him down the path <strong>of</strong> the “secondary cause”. Similarly, PascaleWinand exonerates Monnet from responsibility for encouraging increased US pressure