Need to Know: IFRS 10 - Consolidated Financial ... - BDO Canada
Need to Know: IFRS 10 - Consolidated Financial ... - BDO Canada Need to Know: IFRS 10 - Consolidated Financial ... - BDO Canada
6 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements1. The IASB/FASB projectConsolidation was among the first convergence projects identified by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)and the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). However, although the project was added to the agenda in 2003,substantial progress was not made until 2008. This timing links to the global financial crisis, which started in 2007 andprompted additional focus on consolidation and related disclosures.1.1. Previous GuidancePrevious guidance in IFRSs for consolidation was set out in IAS 27(2008) Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements andSIC-12 Consolidation—Special Purpose Entities.IAS 27(2008) Consolidated and Separate Financial StatementsIAS 27(2008).4 stated that an entity has control over another entity:‘…when it has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefitsfrom is activities.’The standard further explained that in order for control to exist, an entity needed to have the current ability to exercise thatpower. The control principle in IAS 27(2008) was based on the legal structure of the arrangement.SIC-12 Consolidation—Special Purpose EntitiesSpecial Purpose Entities (SPEs) often have predetermined narrow and well-defined objective(s). In some cases, their activitiesare largely predetermined (sometimes termed an ‘autopilot’ structure). SIC-12 required an investor to consolidate an SPE ifit was exposed to the majority of its residual or ownership risks. Essentially, the control principle in SIC-12 was based on ananalysis of risks and rewards.1.2. Rationale for changeThe project to replace the existing guidance in respect of consolidation was undertaken for the following main reasons:––Diversity arose in practice from the application of IAS 27(2008) and SIC-12. It was not always clear whether an entitymeets the definition of an SPE and, in consequence, whether IAS 27(2008) or SIC-12 should be applied. Because they werebased on different principles, the consolidation conclusion reached could differ, depending on whether the guidance inIAS 27(2008) or SIC-12 was followed– – There was a need to enhance disclosure requirements, in particular as a consequence of the global financial crisis. Thecrisis had highlighted a lack of transparency about the extent to which investors were exposed to risks associated with aninvestee’s involvement with ‘off balance sheet vehicles’. These are entities that are not consolidated, but which have thepotential to give rise to exposures in the event of losses. As a result the G20 leaders and the Financial Stability Board askedthe IASB to improve disclosure requirements for such vehicles.
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements71.3. Consolidation packageIn May 2011 the IASB published a package of five new standards which set out new requirements for consolidation,accounting for joint arrangements, and disclosure of interests in other entities. These are effective for period beginning onor after 1 January 2013 1 , and are required to be adopted as a package (except for the disclosure requirements of IFRS 12Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities, which can be adopted early on a stand-alone basis).The new standards are:––IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements––IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements––IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities.In addition, the following standards were revised and renamed:––IAS 27(2011) Separate Financial Statements––IAS 28(2011) Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures.The consolidation requirements previously included in IAS 27(2008) and SIC-12 have been replaced and are set out in a singlestandard, IFRS 10. The revised IAS 27(2011) now only includes guidance for separate financial statements.Guidance for jointly controlled entities that was previously included in IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures is now provided inIFRS 11.All disclosure requirements that, under previous guidance, were included in the individual standards (IAS 27(2008),IAS 28(2008) and IAS 31), are now set out in IFRS 12.Consequently, the requirements of IAS 27(2008) have been amended and restructured, and are now included inthree different accounting standards:IFRS 10Consolidated Financial StatementsIAS 27(2008)Consolidated andSeparate Financial StatementsIAS 27(2011)Separate Financial StatementsIFRS 12Disclosure Interests in Other EntitiesFigure 1: Restructuring IAS 27(2008) Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements1For entities that report in accordance with EU-endorsed IFRS, the effective date is periods beginning 1 January 2014.However, early adoption is permitted, meaning that it remains possible for financial statements to comply withboth EU-endorsed IFRS and IFRS as issued by the IASB.
- Page 8 and 9: 8 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial St
- Page 10 and 11: 10 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 12 and 13: 12 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 14 and 15: 14 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 16 and 17: 16 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 18 and 19: 18 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 20 and 21: 20 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 22 and 23: 22 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 24 and 25: 24 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 26 and 27: 26 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 28 and 29: 28 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 30 and 31: 30 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 32 and 33: 32 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 34 and 35: 34 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 36 and 37: 36 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 38 and 39: 38 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 40 and 41: 40 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 42 and 43: 42 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 44 and 45: 44 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 46 and 47: 46 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 48 and 49: 48 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
- Page 50 and 51: 50 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial S
6 <strong>IFRS</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>Consolidated</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> Statements1. The IASB/FASB projectConsolidation was among the first convergence projects identified by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)and the US <strong>Financial</strong> Accounting Standards Board (FASB). However, although the project was added <strong>to</strong> the agenda in 2003,substantial progress was not made until 2008. This timing links <strong>to</strong> the global financial crisis, which started in 2007 andprompted additional focus on consolidation and related disclosures.1.1. Previous GuidancePrevious guidance in <strong>IFRS</strong>s for consolidation was set out in IAS 27(2008) <strong>Consolidated</strong> and Separate <strong>Financial</strong> Statements andSIC-12 Consolidation—Special Purpose Entities.IAS 27(2008) <strong>Consolidated</strong> and Separate <strong>Financial</strong> StatementsIAS 27(2008).4 stated that an entity has control over another entity:‘…when it has the power <strong>to</strong> govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as <strong>to</strong> obtain benefitsfrom is activities.’The standard further explained that in order for control <strong>to</strong> exist, an entity needed <strong>to</strong> have the current ability <strong>to</strong> exercise thatpower. The control principle in IAS 27(2008) was based on the legal structure of the arrangement.SIC-12 Consolidation—Special Purpose EntitiesSpecial Purpose Entities (SPEs) often have predetermined narrow and well-defined objective(s). In some cases, their activitiesare largely predetermined (sometimes termed an ‘au<strong>to</strong>pilot’ structure). SIC-12 required an inves<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> consolidate an SPE ifit was exposed <strong>to</strong> the majority of its residual or ownership risks. Essentially, the control principle in SIC-12 was based on ananalysis of risks and rewards.1.2. Rationale for changeThe project <strong>to</strong> replace the existing guidance in respect of consolidation was undertaken for the following main reasons:––Diversity arose in practice from the application of IAS 27(2008) and SIC-12. It was not always clear whether an entitymeets the definition of an SPE and, in consequence, whether IAS 27(2008) or SIC-12 should be applied. Because they werebased on different principles, the consolidation conclusion reached could differ, depending on whether the guidance inIAS 27(2008) or SIC-12 was followed– – There was a need <strong>to</strong> enhance disclosure requirements, in particular as a consequence of the global financial crisis. Thecrisis had highlighted a lack of transparency about the extent <strong>to</strong> which inves<strong>to</strong>rs were exposed <strong>to</strong> risks associated with aninvestee’s involvement with ‘off balance sheet vehicles’. These are entities that are not consolidated, but which have thepotential <strong>to</strong> give rise <strong>to</strong> exposures in the event of losses. As a result the G20 leaders and the <strong>Financial</strong> Stability Board askedthe IASB <strong>to</strong> improve disclosure requirements for such vehicles.