13.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat

marker-assisted selection in wheat

marker-assisted selection in wheat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> – Current status and future perspectives <strong>in</strong> crops, livestock, forestry and fishc16, c23bot, c25 and A03. Furthermore,it is worth not<strong>in</strong>g that the BC 4 plant No.104 presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 3, which had <strong>in</strong>trogressedall these five regions, also displayedthe highest fibre strength value of its generation(39.1 g/tex, compared with 33.1 g/texfor the Guazuncho 2 parent). The concomitant<strong>in</strong>trogression of G. barbadense allelesdisplay<strong>in</strong>g positive <strong>marker</strong>-trait associationsfor other fibre properties such as length orf<strong>in</strong>eness was also observed. This translated<strong>in</strong>to the development of different highlyvaluable BC progenies. These prelim<strong>in</strong>aryresults suggest that the improvement ofG. hirsutum fibre properties through the<strong>in</strong>trogression of G. barbadense fibre QTLappears feasible.DiscussionIn an attempt to overcome the limitationsof conventional breed<strong>in</strong>g for improv<strong>in</strong>gcotton fibre quality through the use of<strong>in</strong>terspecific hybridization, molecular<strong>marker</strong>s were used <strong>in</strong> a MAS scheme toimprove the efficiency of <strong>in</strong>trogress<strong>in</strong>gfibre quality traits. The advanced backcross-QTL(AB-QTL) strategy (Tanksleyand Nelson, 1996) was used as this allowedconcomitant development of a genetic mapof the cotton genome and analysis of fibrequality QTL, and attempts to <strong>in</strong>trogressfavourable alleles <strong>in</strong> an adequate recipientgenetic background (Figure 1).In contrast to monogenic characteristicssuch as disease and <strong>in</strong>sect resistance,many important traits <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g yield andquality show cont<strong>in</strong>uous phenotypic variationand are governed by a number ofQTL. Cotton fibre quality is a complexconcept that <strong>in</strong>volves a number of traits orcharacteristics. Each of these is under the<strong>in</strong>fluence of numerous QTL, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>ga complex genetic determ<strong>in</strong>ism. Indeed,from the present results, at least six QTLgovern fibre uniformity and up to 21 QTL<strong>in</strong>fluence fibre f<strong>in</strong>eness. When consider<strong>in</strong>gsix traits that can account for fibrequality, a total of 80 QTL were detected(Table 2). This figure falls with<strong>in</strong> the samerange as that found by Paterson et al.(2003). As some of these QTL co-localizedwith<strong>in</strong> the same chromosome region, bychoos<strong>in</strong>g those QTL whose positive allelederived from the donor parent and had thestrongest effect on economically importantfibre characteristics, the number of targetregions to be <strong>in</strong>trogressed was reduced to19 (Table 3). Nevertheless, this number ofQTL rema<strong>in</strong>s too high to identify a s<strong>in</strong>gleplant that would carry them all. Indeed, <strong>in</strong>the authors’ experience, at the BC 3 stage,s<strong>in</strong>gle plants carried a maximum of fiveregions of <strong>in</strong>terest (eight if consider<strong>in</strong>gregions only partially <strong>in</strong>trogressed), whileat the BC 4 stage, this number was reducedto four (seven if consider<strong>in</strong>g regions onlypartially <strong>in</strong>trogressed).At this stage of the MAS process, tworoutes are under way (Figure 1). The first<strong>in</strong>volves identify<strong>in</strong>g the best BC 4 plants,i.e. those show<strong>in</strong>g the highest amount offavourable QTL <strong>in</strong>trogression, and thenfix<strong>in</strong>g the favourable allele by self-poll<strong>in</strong>ation.Such BC 4 S 1 plants have been crossedwith other BC 4 S 1 plants of different ascent<strong>in</strong> order to pyramid as many QTL as possible(each contribut<strong>in</strong>g to different traits)with<strong>in</strong> the same genome. Similarly, BC 4 S 1plants were used to pyramid various QTLresponsible for a given trait (“selectivepyramid<strong>in</strong>g”). This latter strategy couldespecially apply to traits of commercialimportance, such as fibre strength or f<strong>in</strong>eness.The second avenue <strong>in</strong>volves repeat<strong>in</strong>gthe backcross<strong>in</strong>g process until near isogenicl<strong>in</strong>es differ<strong>in</strong>g only at a given QTL (QTL-NILs) are developed. Such plant materialcould prove useful not only to study the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!