13.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat

marker-assisted selection in wheat

marker-assisted selection in wheat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

424Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> – Current status and future perspectives <strong>in</strong> crops, livestock, forestry and fishEdwards, K., Johnstone, C. & Thompson, C. 1991. A simple and rapid method for the preparationof plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 19(6): 1349.Epp, T.D. 2004. Four-wheel<strong>in</strong>g through the soybean fields of <strong>in</strong>tellectual property law: A practitioner’sperspective. Washburn Law J. 43: 669–679.Fromer, J.C. 2007. Invigorat<strong>in</strong>g the disclosure function of the patent system. NYU Law School,Public Law Research Paper Series, 2 March 2007 (available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=967560) .Fulton, M. & Giannakas, K. 2001. Agricultural biotechnology and <strong>in</strong>dustry structure. AgBioForum,4(2): 137–151.Gallagher, G.J. 2002. Recent development: the Federal circuit and claim construction: resolv<strong>in</strong>g theconflict between the claims and the written description. North Carol<strong>in</strong>a J. Law & Technol. 4(1):121–142.Hore, E. 2004. Patently absurd: evergreen<strong>in</strong>g of pharmaceutical patent protection under the PatentedMedic<strong>in</strong>es (Notice of Compliance) Regulations of Canada’s Patent Act. Canadian GenericPharmaceut. Assocn. (available at www.canadiangenerics.ca/en/issues/patently_absurd_04.pdf).Kattan, J. 2002. Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g patent <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement and validity <strong>in</strong> antitrust analysis (available atwww.ftc.gov/opp/<strong>in</strong>tellect/020514kattan.pdf#search=%22%22merger%22%2B%22<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement%22%22).Kellison, R., McCord, S. & Gartland, K.M.A. 2004. Forest biotechnology <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America. Proc.Forestry Biotech. Workshop, 3–5 March 2004, Concepcíon, Chile (available at www.forestbiotech.org/pdffiles/ChlePDFf<strong>in</strong>al31Jan2005.pdf).Kershen, D.L. 2004. Of stray<strong>in</strong>g crops and patent rights. Washburn Law J. 43: 575–610.Lee, S., A’Hara, S. & Cottrell, J. 2005. The use of DNA technology to advance the Sitka sprucebreed<strong>in</strong>g programme. Forestry Res. Report (available at www.forestresearch.gov.uk/pdf/FR_report_2005-6_dnatech.pdf).Murchie, B.J., Renaud, A.B., Horne, L.E.T. & Hussey, D.T. 2006. Canada’s balanc<strong>in</strong>g act. (availableat www.lexpert.ca/500/lb.php?id=120).O’Connor, S.M. 2006. The use of MTAs to control commercialization of stem cell diagnostics andtherapeutics. Berkeley Technology Law J. (available at : http://ssrn.com/abstract=921170).Röder, M.S., Korzun, V., Wendehake, K., Plaschke, J., Tixier, M.H., Leroy, P. & Ganal, M.W. 1998.A microsatellite map of <strong>wheat</strong>. Genetics. 149(4): 2007–2023.Rothschild, M.F., Plastow, G.S. & Newman, S. 2004. Patent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> animal breed<strong>in</strong>g and genetics. InA. Rosati, A. Tewolde & C. Mosconi, eds. WAAP Book of the Year 2003: a review on developmentsand research <strong>in</strong> livestock systems, pp. 269–278. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, Netherlands, Academic Publishers(also available at www.psas-web.net/documents/Info/3.5%20Rothschild.pdf).Rothschild, M.F., Kim, K.S. & Anderson, L.L. 2006. Ghrel<strong>in</strong> alleles and use of the same for geneticallytyp<strong>in</strong>g animals. US Patent Number 7,074,562.Saghai-Maroof, M.A., Soliman, K.M., Jorgensen, R.A. & Allard, R.W. 1984. Ribosomal DNAspacer-length polymorphisms <strong>in</strong> barley: Mendelian <strong>in</strong>heritance, chromosomal location, and populationdynamics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 81: 8014–8018.Schaeffer, L.R. 2002. Dairy cattle test day models: a case study. In M. Rothschild & S. Newman, eds.,Intellectual property rights <strong>in</strong> animal breed<strong>in</strong>g and genetics. Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, UK, CABI.Smyth, S. 2006. Implication and potential impacts from the expiry of patents on herbicide tolerantcanola varieties. Saskatchewan Canola Development Commission (available at www.saskcanola.com/pdfs/scdc-patent-report.pdf).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!