13.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat

marker-assisted selection in wheat

marker-assisted selection in wheat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

394Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> – Current status and future perspectives <strong>in</strong> crops, livestock, forestry and fish500 000Figure 2Stylized economic model of a plant breed<strong>in</strong>g programmeVarietal adoption stage400 000Net annual benefits (US$)300 000200 000100 000Research<strong>in</strong>vestmentstageVarietalreleasestage0-100 0001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20Time (years)by develop<strong>in</strong>g a simple model of a plantbreed<strong>in</strong>g programme and us<strong>in</strong>g it to comparethe returns with alternative <strong>in</strong>bredl<strong>in</strong>e conversion schemes based on conventional<strong>selection</strong> and MAS. Two measures ofproject worth were used: the net presentvalue (NPV) of the discounted streams ofcosts and benefits, and the <strong>in</strong>ternal rate ofreturn (IRR) to the <strong>in</strong>vestment.Figure 2 depicts the stylized “variety lifecycle” assumed by the model. The stream ofcosts and benefits associated with the development,release and adoption by farmers ofan improved variety can be divided <strong>in</strong>tothree stages: a research stage dur<strong>in</strong>g whichthe variety is developed; a release stagedur<strong>in</strong>g which the variety is evaluated andregistered for release, and commercial seedis produced; and an adoption stage dur<strong>in</strong>gwhich the variety is taken up and grownby farmers. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the first two stages,net benefits are negative, because costsare <strong>in</strong>curred without any benefits be<strong>in</strong>grealized. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the third stage, net benefitsturn positive as the variety is takenup and grown by farmers; they cont<strong>in</strong>ueto <strong>in</strong>crease until the peak adoption level isachieved and then decl<strong>in</strong>e when the varietyis replaced by newer varieties.The model was used to estimate theNPV and IRR of conventional and <strong>marker</strong><strong>assisted</strong><strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>e conversion schemes.Research cost data were taken from theCIMMYT case study. Plausible values wereused for key parameters relat<strong>in</strong>g to the varietalrelease and adoption stages (for details,see Morris et al., 2003). Figure 3 shows thestreams of annual net benefits generated byeach of the two breed<strong>in</strong>g schemes. Annualnet benefits are calculated as follows:NB t = (GB t - VR t - RC t )where:NB = net benefitsGB = gross benefits (calculated as areaplanted to the variety x <strong>in</strong>crementalbenefits associated with adoption)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!