marker-assisted selection in wheat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 17 – Marker-assisted selection in fish and shellfish breeding schemes 359Norris, A.T., Bradley, D.G. & Cunningham, E.P. 2000. Parentage and relatedness determination infarmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) using microsatellite markers. Aquaculture 182: 73–83.O’Brien, S.J. 1991. Molecular genome mapping: lessons and prospects. Curr. Opin. Genet. Devel. 1:105–111.Ollivier, L. 1998. The accuracy of marker-assisted selection for quantitative traits within populationsin linkage equilibrium. Genet. 148: 1367–1372.Ozaki, A., Sakamoto, T., Khoo, S., Nakamura, K., Coimbra, M.R., Akutsu, T. & Okamoto, N.2001. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with resistance/susceptibility to infectious pancreaticnecrosis virus (IPNV) in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Mol. Genet. Genom. 265:23–31.Panitz, F., Holm, L.-E., Høyheim, B., Hagen-Larsen, H., Taggart, J., Cairney, M., Davey, G.C.,Powell, R. & Bendicen, C. 2002. EST sequencing in Atlantic salmon. Proc. 7th Wrld. Congr. Genet.Appl. Livestock Prodn. CD-ROM Communication No 06-14. Montpellier, France.Pante, M.J.R, Gjerde, B. & McMillan, I. 2001. Effect of inbreeding on body weight at harvest inrainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 192: 201–211.Pante, M.J.R., Gjerde, B., McMillan, I. & Mistzal, I. 2002. Estimation of additive and dominancegenetic variances for body weight at harvest in rainbow trout, Oncorhychus mykiss. Aquaculture204: 383–392.Paterson, S., Piertney, S.B. & Knox, D. 2004. Characterization and PCR multiplexing of novelhighly variable tetranucleotide Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. Notes4: 160–162.Pérez-Enciso, M. 2003. Fine mapping of complex trait genes combining pedigree and linkage disequilibriuminformation: a Bayesian unified framework. Genet. 163: 1497–1510.Pérez-Enciso, M. 2004. In silico study of transcriptome genetic variation in outbred populations.Genet. 166: 547–554.Pérez-Enciso, M., Toro, M.A., Tenenhaus, M. & Gianola. D. 2003. Combining gene expression andmolecular marker information for mapping complex trait genes: a simulation study. Genet. 164:1597–1606.Pfrender, M.E., Spitze, K., Hicks, J., Morgan, K.L. & Lynch, L.M. 2000. Lack of concordancebetween genetic diversity estimates at the molecular and quantitative-trait levels. Conserv. Genet.1: 263–269.Piepho, H-P. & Koch, G. 2000. Codominant analysis of banding data from a dominant markersystem by normal mixtures. Genet. 155: 1459–1468.Pong-Wong, R., Villanueva, B. & Woolliams, J.A. 2002. Comparison of direct and marker-assistedselection with optimised contributions. In Proc. 7th Wrld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livestock Prodn.CD-ROM Communication No. 33-02. Montpellier, France.Pong-Wong, R., George, A.W., Woolliams, J.A. & Haley C.S. 2001 A simple and rapid methodfor calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers. Genet. Select. Evol. 33:453–471.Ponzoni, R.W., Hamzah, A., Tan, S. & Kamaruzzaman, N. 2005. Genetic parameters and responseto selection for live weight in the GIFT strain of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture247: 203–210.Queller, D.C. & Goodnight, K.F. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evol. 43:258–275.
360Marker-assisted selection – Current status and future perspectives in crops, livestock, forestry and fishQuinton, C., McMillan, I. & Glebe, B.D. 2005. Development of an Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)genetic improvement program: Genetic parameters of harvest body weight and carcass qualitytraits estimated with animal models. Aquaculture 247: 211–217.Reid, D.P., Szanto, A., Glebe, B., Danzmann, R.G. & Ferguson, M.M. 2005. QTL for body weightand condition factor in Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar): comparative analysis with rainbow trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Hered. 94: 166–172.Rexroad, C.E., Rodriguez, M.F., Gharbi, K., Danzmann, R.G., DeKoning, J., Phillips, R. & Palti,Y. 2005. Comparative mapping of expressed sequence tags containing microsatellites in rainbowtrout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). BMC Genom. 6: 54.Rise, M.L., Von Schalburg, K.R., Brown, G.D., Mawer, M.A., Devlin, R.H., Kuipers, N., Busby,M., Beetz- Sargent, M., Alberto, R., Gibbs, A.R., Hunt, P., Shukin, R., Zeznik, J.A., Nelson,C., Jones, S.R., Smailus, D.E., Jones, S.J., Schein, J.E., Marra, M.A., Butterfield, Y.S., Stott,J.M., Ng, S.H., Davidson, W.S. & Koop, B.F. 2004a. Development and application of a salmonidEST database and cDNA microarray:data mining and interspecific hybridization characteristics.Genome Res. 14: 478–490.Rise, M.L., Jones, S.R., Brown G.D., von Schalburg, K.R., Davidson, W.S. & Koop, B.F. 2004b.Microarray analyses identify molecular biomarkers of Atlantic salmon macrophage and hematopoietickidney response to Piscirickettsia salmonis infection. Physiol. Genom. 20: 21–35.Robison, B., Wheeler, P. & Sundin, K. 2001. Composite interval mapping reveals a QTL of major effecton embryonic development rate in rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss). J. Hered. 92: 16–22.Robison, B., Wheeler, P. & Thorgaard, G. 1999. Variation in development rate among clonal lines ofrainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 173: 131–141.Rodriguez, F.M., LaPatra, S., Williams, S., Famula, T. & May, B. 2004. Genetic markers associatedwith resistance to infectious hematopoietic necrosis in rainbow and steelhead trout (Oncorhynchusmykiss) backcrosses. Aquaculture 241: 93–115.Rye, M. & Mao, I.L. 1998. Nonadditive genetic effects and inbreeding depression for body weight inAtlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Livest. Prodn. Sci. 57: 23–32.Sakamoto, T., Danzmann, R.G., Gharbi, K., Howard, P., Ozaki, A., Khoo, S.K., Woram, R.A.,Okamoto, N., Ferguson, M.M., Holm, L-E., Guyomard, R. & Hoyheim, B. 2000. A microsatellitelinkage map of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) characterized by large sex-specificdifferences in recombination rates. Genet. 155: 1331–1345.Serapion, J., Waldbieser, G.C., Wolters, W. & Wolters, Z.J. 2004. Development of Type I markers inchannel catfish through intron sequencing. Anim. Genet. 35: 463–466.Singer, A., Perlman, H., Yan, Y., Walker, C., Corley-Smith, G., Brandhorst, B. & Postlethwait, J.2002. Sex-specific recombination rates in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Genet. 160: 649–657.Smith, B.R., Herbinger, C.M. & Merry, H.R. 2001. Accurate partition of individuals into full-sibfamilies from genetic data without parental information. Genet. 158: 1329–1338.Somorjai, I.M.L., Danzmann, R.G.& Ferguson, M.M. 2003. Distribution of temperature tolerancequantitative trait loci in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) and inferred homologies in rainbow trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss). Genetics 165: 1443–1456.Streisinger, G.,Walker, C.H., Dower, N., Knauber, D. & Singer, F. 1980. Production of clones ofhomozygous diploid zebra fish (Brachydanio rerio). Nature 291: 293–296.Sun, X. & Liang, L. 2004. A genetic linkage map of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and mappingof a locus associated with cold tolerance. Aquaculture 238: 165–172.
Page 2 and 3:
MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTIONCurrent st
Page 4 and 5:
iiiContentsAcknowledgementsForeword
Page 6 and 7:
Section v - marker-assisted selecti
Page 9 and 10:
viiithe specific gene or chromosome
Page 11 and 12:
CIATCIMMYTCIPCIRADcMCMDCMVCORPOICAC
Page 13 and 14:
xiiISNARISSRITPGRFAJGIKARILDLDLLD-M
Page 16 and 17:
xvContributorsAmalia BaroneProfesso
Page 18 and 19:
xviiElcio Perpétuo GuimarãesSenio
Page 20:
xixAndrea SonninoSenior Agricultura
Page 24 and 25:
Chapter 1Marker-assisted selection
Page 26 and 27:
Chapter 1 - An overview of the issu
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34:
Page 37 and 38:
16Marker-assisted selection - Curre
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 50 and 51:
Chapter 3Molecular markers for use
Page 52 and 53:
Chapter 3 - Molecular markers for u
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 88 and 89:
Chapter 6Targeted introgression of
Page 90 and 91:
Chapter 6 - Targeted introgression
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Chapter 7 - Marker-assisted selecti
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136:
Page 139 and 140:
118Marker-assisted selection - Curr
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 188 and 189:
Chapter 10Strategies, limitations a
Page 190 and 191:
Chapter 10 - Strategies, limitation
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Chapter 11 - Marker-assisted select
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 328:
Section VMarker-assisted selectioni
Page 331 and 332: 310Marker-assisted selection - Curr
Page 379: 358Marker-assisted selection - Curr
Page 386 and 387: Chapter 18Marker-assisted selection
Page 388 and 389: Chapter 18 - Marker-assisted select
Page 402 and 403: Chapter 19Technical, economic and p
Page 404 and 405: Chapter 19 - Technical, economic an
Page 426 and 427: Chapter 20Impacts of intellectual p
Page 428 and 429: Chapter 20 - Impacts of intellectua
Page 430 and 431:
Chapter 20 - Impacts of intellectua
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
Page 442 and 443:
Page 444 and 445:
Page 446:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Page 489 and 490:
Page 491 and 492:
Page 494:
This book provides a comprehensive
show all

marker-assisted selection in wheat

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?