13.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat

marker-assisted selection in wheat

marker-assisted selection in wheat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 14 – Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> <strong>in</strong> Eucalyptus 263and genetic diversity measures estimatedfrom AFLP and microsatellites. Genetic differentiationestimates consistently showedlow differentiation among provenances andgreat differentiation among families suggest<strong>in</strong>gthat orchard design should be basedon <strong>in</strong>dividual or family <strong>selection</strong> rather thanon provenance <strong>selection</strong>.Mat<strong>in</strong>g and deployment designs basedon genetic distanceGiven the wide genetic diversity and multiplesources of available germplasm foreucalypt breed<strong>in</strong>g, choices typically haveto be made as to which elite parents shouldbe mated. Some <strong>selection</strong> based on the <strong>in</strong>dividual’sown performance or on pedigree<strong>in</strong>formation is used before <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>a mat<strong>in</strong>g design. Any means of predict<strong>in</strong>gtree performance deserves attention. One ofthe “holy grails” of molecular breeders hasbeen the ability to predict progeny performanceaccurately based on distance estimatesamong parents from genetic <strong>marker</strong> data.Vaillancourt et al. (1995a) used genetic distancesbased on RAPD <strong>marker</strong>s to predictheterosis <strong>in</strong> E. globulus progenies. Theability of genetic distance to predict heterosiswas significant but accounted for lessthan 5 percent of the variation <strong>in</strong> specificcomb<strong>in</strong>g ability. Baril et al. (1997) used thestructure of RAPD genetic diversity with<strong>in</strong>and between E. grandis and E. urophylla towork out prediction equations for the treetrunk volume of <strong>in</strong>dividual hybrids at 38months. Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, this study showedthat a genetic distance based on RAPD<strong>marker</strong>s with similar frequencies <strong>in</strong> the twospecies successfully predicted the value ofa cross. Through this model, the distancecalculated between species expla<strong>in</strong>ed thegeneral comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability and the specificcomb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability of volume growth witha global coefficient of determ<strong>in</strong>ation of81.6 percent. RAPD <strong>marker</strong>s were usedto recommend more divergent crosses <strong>in</strong> areciprocal recurrent <strong>selection</strong> programmefor hybrid breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Brazil (Ribeiro,Bertolucci and Grattapaglia, 1997). A setwith the 20 most and 20 least divergentcrosses between populations was recommended.Mat<strong>in</strong>gs between more divergent<strong>in</strong>dividuals will potentially allow segregationto be maximized <strong>in</strong> the result<strong>in</strong>gprogenies and transgressive segregants tobe recovered and used as clones.RAPD data were used to quantifyrelatedness among elite eucalypt clonesfor deployment purposes. As the historyof selective breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> eucalypts is veryrecent, little, if any, pedigree <strong>in</strong>formationis typically available. Furthermore, clonalplantations of Eucalyptus generally <strong>in</strong>volveonly a few superior genotypes of unknownorig<strong>in</strong>. Costa e Silva and Grattapaglia(1997) used RAPD <strong>marker</strong>s to quantify thegenetic relatedness among a group of 15elite clones. Comparative similarity analysesshowed that there was significantlymore genomic variation <strong>in</strong> the group ofclones than both with<strong>in</strong> and between unrelatedhalf-sib families from a s<strong>in</strong>gle species.Data on genetic similarity among cloneswere also used to propose a deploymentstrategy <strong>in</strong> a “genetic mosaic”, i.e. avoid<strong>in</strong>gplant<strong>in</strong>g more genetically related clones sideby side <strong>in</strong> contiguous forest blocks. Thisproposed strategy was based on the premisethat related clones share a common orig<strong>in</strong>and ancestry, have been subject to similarevolutionary selective pressures, and thereforeshare common susceptibility/tolerancealleles at pest and pathogen defence loci.Mat<strong>in</strong>g system and paternity <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g populationsOpen poll<strong>in</strong>ated breed<strong>in</strong>g by controll<strong>in</strong>gexclusively the maternal progenitor and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!