marker-assisted selection in wheat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 9 – Molecular marker-assisted selection for resistance to pathogens in tomato 161Doganlar, S., Dodson, J., Gabor, B., Beck-Bunn, T., Crossman, C. & Tanksley, S.D. 1998 Molecularmapping of the py-1 gene for resistance to corky root rot (Pyranochaeta lycopersici) in tomato.Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 784–788.Fazio, G., Stevens, M.R., & Scott, J.W. 1999. Identification of RAPD markers linked to fusariumcrown and root rot resistance (Frl) in tomato. Euphytica 105: 205–210.Folkertsma, R.T., Spassova, M.I., Prins, M., Stevens, M.R., Hille, J. & Goldbach, R.W. 1999.Construction of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library of Lycopersicon esculentum cv.Stevens and its application to physically map the Sw5 locus. Mol. Breed. 5: 197–207.Foolad, M.R. & Sharma, A. 2005. Molecular markers as selection tools in tomato breeding. ActaHort. 695: 225–240.Foolad, M.R., Zhang, L.P., Khan, A.A., Nino-Liu, D. & Lin, G.Y. 2002. Identification of QTLs forearly blight (Alternaria solani) resistance in tomato using backcross populations of a Lycopersiconesculentum x L. hirsutum cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 945–958.Ganal, M.W., Simon, R., Brommonschenkel, S., Arndt, M., Tanksley, S.D. & Kumar, A. 1995.Genetic mapping of a wide spectrum nematode resistance gene (Hero) against Globodera rostochiensisin tomato. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 8: 886–891.Gardner, R.G. & Shoemaker, P.B. 1999. “Mountain Supreme” early blight-resistant hybrid tomatoand its parents NC EBR-3 and NC EBR-4 tomato breeding lines. Hort. Sci. 34: 745–746.Griffiths, P.D. & Scott, J.W. 2001. Inheritance and linkage of tomato mottle virus resistance genesderived from Lycopersicon chilense accession LA 1932. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126: 462–467.Grube, R.C., Radwanski, E.R. & Jahn, M. 2000. Comparative genetics of disease resistance withinthe Solanaceae Genetics 155: 873–887.Hanson, P.M., Bernacchi, D., Green, S., Tanksley, S.D. & Muniy-Appa, V. 2000. Mapping a wildtomato introgression associated with tomato leaf curl virus resistance in a cultivated tomato line. J.Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125: 15–20.Huang, C.C., van de Putte, P.M., Haanstra-van der Meer, J.G., Mejer-Dekens, F. & Lindhout, P.2000. Characterization and mapping of resistance to Oidium lycopersicum in two Lycopersiconhirsutum accessions: evidence for close linkage of two Ol-genes on chromosome 6. Heredity 85:511–520.Hulbert, S.H., Webb, C.A., Smith, S.M. & Sun, Q. 2001. Resistance gene complexes: evolution andutilization. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 39: 285–312.Jones, D.A., Dickinson, M.J., Balint-Kurt, P.J., Dixon, M.S. & Jones, J.D.G. 1993. Two complexresistance loci revealed in tomato by classical and RFLP mapping of Cf-2, Cf-4, Cf-5, and Cf-9genes for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 6: 348–357.Kabelka, E., Franchino, B. & Francio, D.M. 2002. Two loci from Lycopersicon hirsutum LA407confer resistance to strains of Clavibacter michiganense subsp. michiganensis. Phytopath. 92:504–510.Kawchuck, L.M., Hachey, J. & Lynch, D.R. 1998. Development of sequence characterized DNAmarkers linked to a dominant Verticillium wilt resistance gene in tomato. Genome 41: 91–95.Kawchuk, L.M., Hachey, J., Lynch, D.R., Kulcsar, F., van Rooijen, G., Waterer, D.R., Robertson,A., Kokko, E., Byers, R., Howar, R.J., Fischer, R. & Prufer, D. 2001. Tomato Ve disease resistancegenes encode cell surface-like receptors. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 6511–6515.Konieczyn, A. & Ausubel, F.M. 1993. A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using codominantecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J. 4: 403–410.
162Marker-assisted selection – Current status and future perspectives in crops, livestock, forestry and fishLangella, R., Ercolano, M.R., Monti, L., Frusciante, L. & Barone, A. 2004 Molecular markerassisted transfer of resistance to TSWV in tomato elite lines. J. Hort. Sci. & Biotech. 79: 806–810Laterrot, H. 1996. Breeding strategies for disease resistance in tomatoes with emphasis to the tropics:current status and research challenges, pp.126–132. Proc.1 st Internat. Symp. Trop. Tomato Dis.Recife, Brazil.Lefebvre, V. & Chèvre, A.M. 1995. Tools for marking plant disease and pest resistance genes: a review.Agronomie 15: 3–19.Leister, D., Ballvora, A., Salamini, F. & Gebhardt, C. 1996. PCR-based approach for isolating pathogenresistance genes from potato with potential for wide application in plants. Nature Genet. 14:421–429.Levesque, H., Vedel, F., Mathieu, C. & de Courcel, A.G.L. 1990. Identification of a short rDNAspacer sequence highly specific of a tomato line containing Tm-1 gene introgressed fromLycopersicon hirsutum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 602–608.Martin, G.B., Brommonschenkel, S., Chunwongse, J., Frary, A., Ganal, M.W., Spivey, R., Wu, T.,Earle, E.D. & Tanksley, S.D. 1993. Map-based cloning of a protein kinase gene conferring diseaseresistance in tomato. Science 262: 1432–1436.Michelmore, R.W. 2003. The impact zone: genomics and breeding for durable disease resistance. Curr.Opin. Plant Biol. 6397–6404.Moreau, P., Thoquet, P., Olivier J., Laterrot, H. & Grimsley, N.H. 1998. Genetic mapping of Ph-2, asingle locus controlling partial resistance to Phytophthora infestans in tomato. Mol. Plant-MicrobeInteract. 11: 259–268.Morgante, M. & Salamini, F. 2003. From plant genomics to breeding practice. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.14: 214–219.Ori, N., Eshed, Y., Paran, I., Prestino, G., Aviv, D., Tanksley, S.D., Zamir, D. & Fluhr, R. 1997. TheI2C family from the wilt disease resistance locus I2 belongs to the nucleotide binding, leucine-richrepeat superfamily of plant resistance genes. Plant Cell 9: 521–532.Parrella, G., Ruffel, S., Moretti, A., Morel, C., Palloix, A. & Caranta, C. 2002. Recessive resistancegenes against potyviruses are localized in colinear genomic regions of the tomato (Lycopersiconspp.) and pepper (Capsicum spp.) genomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 855–861.Parrella, G., Moretti, A., Gognalons, P., Lesage, M-L., Marchoux, G., Gebre-Selassie, K. & Carata,C. 2004. The Am gene controlling resistance to alfalfa mosaic virus in tomato is located in the clusterof dominant resistance genes on chromosome 6. Phytopath. 94: 345–350.Peleman, J.D. & van der Voort, J.R. 2003. Breeding by design. Trends Plant Sci. 8: 330–334.Pillen, K., Pineda, O., Lewis, C.B. & Tanksley, S.D. 1996. Status of genome mapping tools in thetaxon Solanaceae. In A. Paterson, ed. Genome mapping in plants, pp. 281–308. Austin, TX, USA,Landes.Rao, A.V. & Agarwal, S. 2000. Role of antioxidant lycopene in cancer and heart disease. J. Am. Coll.Nutr. 19: 563–569.Robert, V.J.M., West, M.A.L., Inai, S., Caines, A., Arntzen, L., Smith, J.K. & St. Clair, D.A. 2001.Marker-assisted introgression of blackmold resistance QTL alleles from wild Lycopersicon cheesmaniito cultivated tomato (L. esculentum) and evaluation of QTL phenotypic effects. Mol. Breed.8: 217–233.Salmeron, J.M., Oldroyd, G.E.D., Rommens, C.M.T., Scofield, S.R., Kim, H.S., Lavello, D.T.,Dahlbeck, D. & Staskawicz, B.J. 1996. Tomato Prf is a member of the leucine-rich repeat class of
Page 2 and 3:
MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTIONCurrent st
Page 4 and 5:
iiiContentsAcknowledgementsForeword
Page 6 and 7:
Section v - marker-assisted selecti
Page 9 and 10:
viiithe specific gene or chromosome
Page 11 and 12:
CIATCIMMYTCIPCIRADcMCMDCMVCORPOICAC
Page 13 and 14:
xiiISNARISSRITPGRFAJGIKARILDLDLLD-M
Page 16 and 17:
xvContributorsAmalia BaroneProfesso
Page 18 and 19:
xviiElcio Perpétuo GuimarãesSenio
Page 20:
xixAndrea SonninoSenior Agricultura
Page 24 and 25:
Chapter 1Marker-assisted selection
Page 26 and 27:
Chapter 1 - An overview of the issu
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34:
Page 37 and 38:
16Marker-assisted selection - Curre
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 50 and 51:
Chapter 3Molecular markers for use
Page 52 and 53:
Chapter 3 - Molecular markers for u
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 88 and 89:
Chapter 6Targeted introgression of
Page 90 and 91:
Chapter 6 - Targeted introgression
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Chapter 7 - Marker-assisted selecti
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133: Chapter 7 - Marker-assisted selecti
Page 134 and 135: Chapter 7 - Marker-assisted selecti
Page 136: Chapter 7 - Marker-assisted selecti
Page 139 and 140: 118Marker-assisted selection - Curr
Page 181: 160Marker-assisted selection - Curr
Page 188 and 189: Chapter 10Strategies, limitations a
Page 190 and 191: Chapter 10 - Strategies, limitation
Page 206 and 207: Chapter 11Marker-assisted selection
Page 208 and 209: Chapter 11 - Marker-assisted select
Page 220 and 221: Chapter 12Marker-assisted selection
Page 232 and 233:
Chapter 12 - Marker-assisted select
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302:
Page 305 and 306:
284Marker-assisted selection - Curr
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 328:
Section VMarker-assisted selectioni
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Chapter 19Technical, economic and p
Page 404 and 405:
Chapter 19 - Technical, economic an
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
Page 418 and 419:
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
Page 426 and 427:
Chapter 20Impacts of intellectual p
Page 428 and 429:
Chapter 20 - Impacts of intellectua
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
Page 442 and 443:
Page 444 and 445:
Page 446:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Page 489 and 490:
Page 491 and 492:
Page 494:
This book provides a comprehensive
show all

marker-assisted selection in wheat

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?