13.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat

marker-assisted selection in wheat

marker-assisted selection in wheat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7 – Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> <strong>in</strong> common beans and cassava 103<strong>in</strong> a CET for evaluation of root prote<strong>in</strong>content at ten months. The grand parentall<strong>in</strong>es of the BC 1 population were genotypedwith over 800 simple sequence repeat (SSR)<strong>marker</strong>s available for cassava and about 300polymorphic <strong>marker</strong>s were identified. Thepolymorphic <strong>marker</strong>s are be<strong>in</strong>g assayed <strong>in</strong>the progenies after which QTL analysis willbe conducted us<strong>in</strong>g the phenotypic prote<strong>in</strong>and molecular <strong>marker</strong> data. Genotypes thathave QTL for prote<strong>in</strong> and a m<strong>in</strong>imum of thedonor parent genome will be selected andused for produc<strong>in</strong>g the BC 2 generation.For <strong>in</strong>trogression of naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>gmutant granule-bound starch synthase(GBSSI) for waxy starch <strong>in</strong> wild relatives,a more targeted approach was taken.Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of the glycosyl transferase regionof the GBSSI gene from the wild relativesand two cassava accessions identified fours<strong>in</strong>gle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)that differentiated the wild accessions fromcassava. Allele-specific molecular <strong>marker</strong>sunique to these SNPs were developed for<strong>selection</strong> of these alleles <strong>in</strong> a breed<strong>in</strong>gscheme.Genetic crosses were made betweenM. chlorosticta accession CW14-11 andMTAI8, and the result<strong>in</strong>g F 1 was backcrossedto MTAI8. The allele specific<strong>marker</strong> will be used together with otheragronomic traits, particularly performance,to select for BC 1 that carry the mutantGBSS alleles for self-poll<strong>in</strong>ation to recoverthe waxy trait. The identification of naturalmutants <strong>in</strong> a key gene and development of<strong>marker</strong>s represent an <strong>in</strong>novative moleculartool to accelerate the <strong>in</strong>trogression offavourable alleles from wild relatives <strong>in</strong>tocassava. Backcross derivatives have alsobeen developed from M. walkerae (MWal001) for delayed post-harvest physiologicaldeterioration; from MNG11 (a BC 4derivative of M. glaziovii) for resistance tohornworm; and from M. esculenta sub spp.flabellifolia (FLA447-1) for resistance towhiteflies. Phenotypic and genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>gof these backcross populations are <strong>in</strong>progress to be followed by identification ofQTL and <strong>selection</strong> of progenies to generatethe next generation. MAS will later be usedto comb<strong>in</strong>e these genes <strong>in</strong>to progenitors foruse as parents <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g which, togetherwith low cost <strong>marker</strong> technologies, willbe distributed extensively to nationalprogrammes <strong>in</strong> Africa, Asia and Lat<strong>in</strong>America to produce improved varieties.Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> estimation of averageheterozygosity dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g of cassavaA pr<strong>in</strong>cipal use of molecular <strong>marker</strong>s byprivate sector breed<strong>in</strong>g companies is toaccelerate the development of <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es.Cassava genotypes are heterozygous andvery little <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g has been practisedto date. However, <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es arebetter as parents as they do not have theconfound<strong>in</strong>g effect of dom<strong>in</strong>ance and carrylower levels of genetic load (undesirablealleles). Speed of <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g depends uponthe average heterozygosity of the orig<strong>in</strong>alparental l<strong>in</strong>es, the homozygosity level ofthe selected genotypes at the end of theself-poll<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g phase and the process of<strong>selection</strong> of progenies to be self-poll<strong>in</strong>ated(Scotti et al., 2000). Basically <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g process two events go together:phenotypically there is a decrease <strong>in</strong> vigour,which is correlated with the <strong>in</strong>creased levelsof homozygosity. While the aim is to selectvigorous plants (tolerant to <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g), <strong>in</strong>the process plants may be selected that areless homozgygous than the expected averagefor their generation. It is expected that thefirst few cycles of self-poll<strong>in</strong>ation will result<strong>in</strong> a marked reduction of vigour (<strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>gdepression associated with the genetic loadof the parental l<strong>in</strong>es); therefore, <strong>selection</strong> for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!