Other Procurement, BA 4 - U.S. Navy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEETDATE:P-40FEBRUARY 2005APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITYP-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVYBA 7: PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT LI: 808100Program Element for Code B Items:Other Related Program ElementsPrior ID ToYears Code FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Complete TotalQUANTITYCOST(In Thousands) $8,034.0 $14,273.0 $25,400.0 $15,984.0 $14,062.0 $14,789.0 $14,529.0 $14,870.0 $15,110.0 N/A $137,051.0SPARES COST(In Thousands)The equipment procured under the Training Support Equipment line supports:CeTARS - Corporate enterprise Training Activity Resource SystemsIn preparation for out-year reductions in funding and personnel resources, and in choosing to adopt a pro-active, long-term Strategic Information Resource Plan that balances economics and currenttechnology upgrades that are consistent with industry and eGovernment computing trends, NETC has begun the initial phases of the transitional process to move STASS and NITRAS into the Chief of NavalOperations’ (CNO's) Web Enabled Navy (WEN) and the Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) architecture/ operational environment. This migration is a must as we transition to a central site hosted,enterprise-wide, Web/thin client solution. As of September 2002 the STASS and NITRAS applications/data bases were combined and are now supported under the umbrella CETARS architecture, i.e., thetransitional phase. CeTARS is the Navy’s Corporate Training Database and the sole source of official Navy Training statistics for all formal training, and provides a comprehensive automation tool in supportof the day to day schoolhouse training functions. As a single integrated system, the CeTARS mission is to provide: improved access to training information, timely and accurate schoolhouse data, and realtime student tracking to the Navy/Marine Corps training community. CeTARS supports over 450 activities and schoolhouses, i.e., (Naval Education and Training Command (NAVEDTRACOM) and non-NAVEDTRACOM). CeTARS "up-line" reporting provides accurate student status and quota utilization information to the Navy Training Quota Management System (NTQMS) and the Navy TrainingReservation System (NTRS). These core systems form the overarching strategy which integrates the critical functions required for the efficient and effective recruiting, training, and distribution of personnelto the fleet. Together these systems, known as the Integrated Navy Training Requirements and Planning Databases (INTRPD), support on-line real time synchronization of databases and provide for thetimely and accurate processing of military manpower between the personnel and training commands. CeTARS is a major building block and key element to the success of the INTRPD concept. The nextphase, i.e., the target, is to transition CeTARS to a Java/HTML/Extensible Markup Language (XML)/thin client environment, as required by CNO's Task Force Web (TFW), and to align the CeTARSapplication with the operational infrastructure required to interface with the Navy Enterprise Portal (NEP) at presentation Level 3/Application/Data Integration. The FY04 funds are being spent on thefollowing for CeTARS: Host Computers/Processors, RAID Disk Arrays/Storage Devices, Storage Area Networks (SANs), Computer Peripherals Devices, Web Application Servers, PKI Accelerators/LoadBalancers, Back Up Power Sources, Bar Code and Test Score Scanners, etc.P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:DD Form 2454, JUN 86 ITEM NO. 134 PAGE NO. 1 UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEETDATE:P-40 ContinuationFEBRUARY 2005APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITYP-1 ITEM NOMENCLATUREOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVYBA 7: PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT LI: 808100Battle Stations 21Battle Stations is the capstone, performance-based training exercise of basic military training (BMT). It is the ‘right of passage’ which symbolically transforms recruits into U.S. Navy Sailors. It providesrecruits with the opportunity to actively apply skills learned in the classroom to a stressful, interactive simulated combat environment. The current Battle Stations exercise is fragmented into thirteenscenarios conducted over a 14 hour period at eight different satellite locations, and recruits must run and/or march approximately six miles between locations during the exercise. The antiquatedbuildings are used primarily 8034for regular classroom instruction and lab application training. Events are "low-tech" constructed as self-help projects by the facilitators.Battle Stations 21, however, will revolutionize this final step of recruit training. It will convert the fragmented, stand-alone scenarios of the current exercise into a single storyline composed of realisticallysequenced events experienced onboard a simulated ship, the USS Trayer. For the first time, all events will be housed in a single facility. Real-life Navy events, based on actual Naval history, will comealive; immersing recruits in whatever situation comes their way. The new Battle Stations 21 facility is being built as part of a MILCON Project (#P-745) approved under the RTC Recapitalization Plan.The FY05 funds will be spent on the following in order to outfit the Battle Stations 21 Milcon facility: Exercise Media (Sound, Film, and Visual Effects), Training Management and Exercise Control System(Software), Training Management and Exercise Control System Interface (Hardware), Training Exercise Audio System, Visual Display Hardware, and Training Scenario Special Effects (Fire, Flood,Smoke, Wind, Temperature).Pressure Vessel AssembliesOPN funding includes End of Life/Obsolete Equipment Replacement (EOL/OER) for the Pressure Vessel Assemblies (PVA) at the Navy Diving and Salvage Training School (NDSTS). EOL/OER for thePVA's is a must for the following reasons: To replace HAZCAT 1 components with HAZCAT 2 components (HAZMAT 1 means that failure of component is catastrophic and could mean loss of life); Tomeet current codes (systems were designed in the mid 1970's); To centralize and automate control of each PVA (eliminating operational confusion and reducing the manpower required to operate eachPVA), and to reduce components and piping by approximately 50% (reducing regular maintenance and ovehaul cost). Continued PVA use past their intended lifespan will increase the risk of eventualcatastrophic material failures, personnel injuries or fatalities due to the malfunctioning of archaic components resulting in an unacceptable level of risks to dive personnel.Modular Firing RangesFleet Forces Command (FFC) has significantly increased individual training requirements for Anti-Terrorism Force Protection (AT/FP) as a result of the war on terrorism. The Center for Anti-Terrorismand Naval Security Forces (CATNSF) is responsible for the development and sustainment of Navy-wide Anti-Terrorism Force Protection (AT/FP) training programs in accordance with CNO policy. TheYokosuka Japan training site currently cannot meet the live fire requirements for all small arms with local assets. The acquisition of modular firing ranges will allow students to perform qualificationshoots for required small arms (pistols, shotguns, rifles) onsite, significantly reducing TAD cost.NOTE: Reprogramming of OPN funding has been requested for Battle Stations 21 ($15,929) to R&D funding.P-1 SHOPPING LIST CLASSIFICATION:DD Form 2454, JUN 86 ITEM NO. 134 PAGE NO. 2 UNCLASSIFIED
Page 1 and 2:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFISCAL YEAR (
Page 3 and 4:
UNCLASSIFIEDDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYF
Page 5 and 6:
CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET I
Page 7 and 8:
CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDWEAPONS
Page 9 and 10:
CLASSIFICATION:P3AUNCLASSIFIEDINDIV
Page 11 and 12:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET
Page 13 and 14:
CLASSIFICATION:P3AUNCLASSIFIEDINDIV
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDWEAPONS
Page 20 and 21:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDCLASSIF
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASS
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET P
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDP3A (Co
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDP3AINDI
Page 54 and 55:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDP3AINDI
Page 56 and 57:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDP3AMODE
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
FY 06/07 BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHEDULE
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
FY 06/07 BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHEDULE
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
CLASSIFICATION:BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFIC
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
UNCLASSIFIEDALTERATIONSAlterations
Page 108 and 109:
UNCLASSIFIEDAPPROPRIATION/BUDGET AC
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED FEBRUA
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
UNCLASSIFIEDCLASSIFICATION:BUDGET P
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
FY 2002/2003 BUDGET PRODUCTION SCHE
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDSIMULATO
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIEDTIME PH
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
APPROPRIATIONBUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICAT
Page 180 and 181:
APPROPRIATIONOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAV
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199: APPROPRIATIONOTHER PROCUREMENT, NAV
Page 230 and 231: DOD EXHIBIT P-40 Date: February 200
Page 232 and 233: APPROPRIATION February 2005OTHER PR
Page 234 and 235: PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING Fe
Page 236 and 237: APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITYOTHER
Page 238 and 239: PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING Fe
Page 240 and 241: DOD EXHIBIT P-40 Date February 2005
Page 242 and 243: DOD Exhibit P-40 February 2005Other
Page 244 and 245: Exhibit P-40a, Budget Item Justific
Page 246 and 247: Exhibit P-40, Budget Item Justifica
Page 250 and 251: CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET I
Page 254 and 255: CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDCOST ANA
Page 260 and 261: CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDWEAPONS
Page 270 and 271: CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET P
Page 272 and 273: UNCLASSIFIEDAPPROPRIATIONOTHER PROC
Page 274 and 275: CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET P
Page 276 and 277: CLASSIFICATION:UNCLASSIFIEDDepartme
Page 278 and 279: CLASSIFICATIONUNCLASSIFIEDBUDGET IT
Page 280 and 281: CLASSIFICATIONUNCLASSIFIEDA. DATEPR
Page 282 and 283: FY2006/2007 OSD/OMB Budget Estimate
Page 284 and 285: FY2006/2007 OSD/OMB Budget Estimate
Page 286 and 287: Program Cost BreakdownExhibit P-5 C
Page 288 and 289: Program Cost BreakdownExhibit P-5 C
Page 290 and 291: Department of the NavyOther Procure
show all

Other Procurement, BA 4 - U.S. Navy

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?