13.07.2015 Views

Tunnel Face Stability & New CPT Applications - Geo-Engineering

Tunnel Face Stability & New CPT Applications - Geo-Engineering

Tunnel Face Stability & New CPT Applications - Geo-Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 2. <strong>Stability</strong> Analysis of the <strong>Tunnel</strong> <strong>Face</strong>OγOγOγτττ(a)(b)(c)Figure 2.9: Circular and spherical failure mechanisms [98]zx yCDFigure 2.10: Wedge and silo modelure 2.9) have been calculated by Krause [98] in 1987 in a limit-equilibrium analysis usingthe shear stresses on the sliding planes. Of the three mechanisms proposed, the quarter circle(Figure 2.9b) will always yield the highest minimal support pressures min = 1tan ϕ( 13 D γ ′ − 1 2 π c ). (2.14)As Krause already indicates this may not always be a realistic representation of the actual failurebody. In many cases the half-spherical body (Figure 2.9c) will be a better representation. In thatcase the minimal support pressure can be found froms min = 1tan ϕ( 19 D γ ′ − 1 2 π c ). (2.15)An often encountered limit equilibrium model is the wedge model, which assumes a slidingwedge loaded by a soil silo. As it is central to the new stability model developed in this thesis,the theoretical background of the wedge model will be covered in more detail in section 2.2. Anumber of slightly different implementations has been described in literature.Murayama [92, 98] calculated the minimal support pressure using a two-dimensional logspiralshaped sliding plane in 1966 (Figure 2.11). Five years before, a three-dimensional model

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!