Tunnel Face Stability & New CPT Applications - Geo-Engineering

More documents

Recommendations

Info

174 Bibliography[152] M.Th.J.H. Smits and B. de Ruiter. Hoe schadelijk zijn trillingen door (ondergrondse)bouwactiviteiten? Geotechniek, 2(2):11–17, April 1998.[153] V.V. Sokolovskii. Statics of Granular Media. Pergamon Press, London, 1965.[154] T.D. Stark and S.M. Olson. Liquefaction resistance using CPT and field case histories.ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 121(12):856–869,December 1995.[155] W. Steiner. Slurry penetration into coarse grained soils and settlements from large slurryshield tunnel. In Mair and Taylor [111], pages 329–333.[156] R. Sternath and Th. Baumann. Face support for tunnels in loose ground. In J. Golser, W.J.Hinkel, and W. Shubert, editors, Tunnels for People, pages 317–323, Rotterdam, 1997.Balkema.[157] O.D.L. Strack. Groundwater Mechanics. Prentice Hall, 1989.[158] J.P. Sully, P.K. Robertson, R.G. Campanella, and D.J. Woeller. An approach to evaluationof field CPTU dissipation data in overconsolidated fine-grained soils. CanadianGeotechnical Journal, 36:369–381, 1999.[159] A. Tanaka and G.E. Bauer. Dilatometer tests in a Leda clay crust. In Robertson andMayne [143], pages 877–882.[160] C.I. Teh and G.T. Houlsby. An analytical study of the cone penetration test in clay.Géotechnique, 41(1):17–34, 1991.[161] K. Terzaghi. Theoretical Soil Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, 1951.[162] E. Teunissen. Metingen en postdicties boorfrontdrukken buis 1. Technical report, CentrumOndergronds Bouwen, 1999.[163] S.P. Timoshenko and J.N. Goodier. Theory of Elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2ndedition, 1951.[164] A.F. van Tol. Stabiliteit van diepwandsleuven. In Funderingstechniek II, S&E PublicatieNo. 20, pages 107–139, Gouda, 1987. Betonvereniging.[165] A.O. Uriel and C. Sagaseta. General report: Selection of design parameters for undergroundconstruction. In of XII ICSMFE [130], pages 2521–2551.[166] A. Verruijt. Theory of Groundwater Flow. Macmillan, London, 1970.[167] A. Verruijt. Grondmechanica. DUM, Delft, 1990.[168] A. Verruijt. Stresses in tunnel linings. Private Communications, 1996.[169] A. Verruijt, F.L. Beringen, and E.H. de Leeuw, editors. Proceedings of the SecondEuropean Symposium on Penetration Testing. Balkema, May 1982.[170] A.S. Vesić. Expansion of cavities in infinite soil mass. Journal of the Soil Mechanics andFoundations Division, 98(3):265–290, March 1972.
Bibliography 175[171] F.W.J. van Vliet, W.G.M. van Kesteren, and D.R. Mastbergen. Stromingsprocessen inmengkamer TBM. Interim report K100-W-034, WL/Delft Hydraulics, May 1996.[172] S. van Vliet and F.J. Wermer. Boorproces Tweede Heinenoordtunnel weer hervat navertraging door instabiliteit graaffront. COB Nieuwsbrief, 1(3), November 1997.[173] S. Wallis. Redesigned hydroshield gives boulders short drift. Tunnels & Tunneling, pages41–42, June 1990.[174] B. Walz, J. Gerlach, and M. Pulsfort. Schlitzwandbauweise, Konstruktion, Berechnungund Ausführung. Technical report, Bergische Universität Gesamthochschule Wuppertal,1983.[175] C.P. Wroth. The interpretation of in situ soil tests. Géotechnique, 34(4):449–489, December1984.[176] C.P. Wroth. Penetration testing — A more rigorous approach to interpretation. In Ruiter[145], pages 303–311.[177] H.S. Yu, L.R. Hermann, and R.W. Boulanger. Analysis of steady cone penetration in clay.ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,126(7):594–605, July2000.[178] H.S. Yu and J.K. Mitchell. Analysis of cone resistance: Review of methods. ASCEJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, pages 140–149, February1998.
Page 1:
Tunnel Face Stability&New CPT Appli
Page 4 and 5:
Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd doo
Page 6 and 7:
viAcknowledgementsKolla här, min
Page 8 and 9:
viiiAbstractThe tunnel wound on and
Page 10 and 11:
xContents3.2.4 Finite Element Model
Page 12 and 13:
xiiList of Symbols× ij i = j norma
Page 14:
xivList of Symbolsλfirst Lamé con
Page 17 and 18:
1.2. Outline of this Thesis 3suppor
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 2Stability Analysis of the
Page 21 and 22:
2.1. Introduction 7fluidsoilzs Fα
Page 23 and 24:
2.1. Introduction 9Figure 2.3: Unsu
Page 25 and 26:
2.1. Introduction 11q sq sq sααα
Page 27 and 28:
φ = 40 ◦φ = 35 ◦2.1. Introduc
Page 29 and 30:
2.1. Introduction 15T 1 T 1E1 E 1G
Page 31 and 32:
2.1. Introduction 17N Deformation<
Page 33 and 34:
2.1. Introduction 19GC45 ◦ + φ/2
Page 35 and 36:
2.1. Introduction 21Figure 2.19: Ce
Page 37 and 38:
2.1. Introduction 23Figure 2.21: In
Page 39 and 40:
2.1. Introduction 25D (m) Soil type
Page 41 and 42:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 27the su
Page 43 and 44:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 29xyhz =
Page 45 and 46:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 31s ′
Page 47 and 48:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 33q 02ad
Page 49 and 50:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 35200400
Page 51 and 52:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 37with a
Page 53 and 54:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 39s(z t
Page 55 and 56:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 41∆p f
Page 57 and 58:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 43has be
Page 59 and 60:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 45from t
Page 61 and 62:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 47γF(t/
Page 63 and 64:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 49s min
Page 65 and 66:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 5140∆s
Page 67 and 68:
2.3. Model Sensitivity Analysis 53P
Page 69 and 70:
2.3. Model Sensitivity Analysis 55i
Page 71 and 72:
2.3. Model Sensitivity Analysis 57
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
2.3. Model Sensitivity Analysis 63t
Page 79 and 80:
2.3. Model Sensitivity Analysis 65o
Page 81 and 82:
2.4. Comparison with Field Cases 67
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Figure 2.57: Overview of soil strat
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
2.5. Further Groundwater Influences
Page 111 and 112:
2.6. Conclusions 97the effective st
Page 113 and 114:
2.6. Conclusions 99has been made th
Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 3Horizontal Cone Penetratio
Page 117 and 118:
3.2. Interpretation of Cone Penetra
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
3.3. Calibration Chamber Tests on S
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138: 3.3. Calibration Chamber Tests on S
Page 143 and 144: 3.4. Scale Model Tests 129Figure 3.
Page 145 and 146: 3.4. Scale Model Tests 1315210Figur
Page 147 and 148: 3.5. Field Tests 133Figure 3.35: Pl
Page 149 and 150: 3.6. Modelling Horizontal Cone Pene
Page 155 and 156: 3.7. Conclusions 141W H/V 043Ticino
Page 157 and 158: Chapter 4High-Speed Piezocone Tests
Page 159 and 160: 4.2. Determination of Liquefaction
Page 161 and 162: 4.2. Determination of Liquefaction
Page 163 and 164: 4.4. Calibration Chamber Tests 149
Page 165 and 166: 4.4. Calibration Chamber Tests 1518
Page 167 and 168: 4.4. Calibration Chamber Tests 153v
Page 169 and 170: 4.4. Calibration Chamber Tests 155-
Page 171 and 172: 4.5. Conclusions and Recommendation
Page 173 and 174: 4.5. Conclusions and Recommendation
Page 175 and 176: Chapter 5Conclusions and Recommenda
Page 177 and 178: 5. Conclusions and Recommendations
Page 179 and 180: Bibliography[1] M.Y. Abu-Farsakh, G
Page 181 and 182: Bibliography 167[30] B. Belter, W.
Page 183 and 184: Bibliography 169[65] J.K. van Deen.
Page 185 and 186: Bibliography 171[99] E. Kreyszig. A
Page 187: Bibliography 173[133] Committee on
Page 191 and 192: Curriculum VitaeWout Broere was bor
Page 193 and 194: SamenvattingGraaffrontstabiliteit &
Page 195 and 196: Samenvatting 181spanningen ook in d
Page 197 and 198: NawoordIn de afgelopen jaren heb ik
Page 199 and 200: Appendix ABasic Equations of Ground
Page 201 and 202: A.1. Semi-confined System of Aquife
Page 203 and 204: A.2. Transient Flow 189withS s the
Page 205 and 206: ....Appendix BBasic Equations of El
Page 207: B. Basic Equations of Elasticity 19
show all

Tunnel Face Stability & New CPT Applications - Geo-Engineering

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?