Tunnel Face Stability & New CPT Applications - Geo-Engineering

More documents

Recommendations

Info

170 Bibliography[81] G.T. Houlsby and R. Hitchman. Calibration chamber tests of a cone penetrometer in sand.Géotechnique, 38(1):39–44, 1988.[82] J. Huder. Stability of bentonite slurry trenches with some experiences in Swiss practice.In Fifth ECSMFE, Madrid, volume 1, pages 517–522, 1972.[83] M. Huisman. Meetrapport consistentie boorvloeistof. Technical Report 18, Boren Tunnelsen Leidingen, 1996.[84] M. Huisman. Theorie en proeven statische afpleistering. Technical Report 34, BorenTunnels en Leidingen, 1998.[85] M. Huisman and A.M. Talmon. Verandering consistentie boorvloeistof. Technical Report30, Boren Tunnels en Leidingen, 1997.[86] M. Hutteman and E.A.H. Teunissen. Palenproef. COB Nieuwsbrief, 1(2), July 1997.[87] M. Jamiolkowski, V.N. Ghionna, R. Lancelotta, and E. Pasqualini. New correlations ofpenetration tests for design practice. In Ruiter [145], pages 263–296.[88] S. Jancsecz. Modern shield tunneling in the view of geotechnical engineering: A reappraisalof experience. In of XIV ICSMFE [131], pages 1415–1420.[89] S. Jancsecz and W. Steiner. Face support for a large mix-shield in heterogenous groundconditions. In Tunneling ’94, London, 1994. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy.[90] K. Joustra and J.G. de Gijt. Results and interpretation of cone penetration tests in soils ofdifferent mineralogic composition. In Verruijt et al. [169], pages 615–626.[91] W.G.B. te Kamp. The influence of the rate of penetration on the cone resistance ‘q c ’ insand. In Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Penetration Testing, pages627–633, Rotterdam, 1982. Balkema.[92] S. Kanayasu, I. Kubota, and N. Shikibu. Stability of face during shield tunneling – Asurvey of Japanese shield tunneling. In Fujita and Kusakabe [71], pages 337–343.[93] M. Kilchert and J. Karstedt. Schlitzwände als Trag- und Dichtungwände, Band 2, Standsicherheitberechnungvon Schlitzwänden, pages 28–34. DIN, Berlin, 1984.[94] T. Kimura and R.J. Mair. Centrifugal testing of model tunnels in soft clay. In of X. ICSMFE[129], pages 319–322.[95] J.A. Kleinjan. Leidingentunnel Oude Maas. Resultaten kennisproject. Technical Report98-052/A, Gemeentewerken Rotterdam, 1999.[96] F. Kleist and T. Strobl. Die Fließgrenze von Schmalwandsuspensionen und die Auslaufzeitaus dem Marsh-Trichter. Geotechnik, 21(2):97–102, 1998.[97] K.M.S.K. Kosgoda. Horizontal soil investigation using cone penetration test (HCPT)in sandy soil. Master’s thesis, International Institute for Hydraulics and EnvironmentalEngineering, Delft, February 2000.[98] T. Krause. Schildvortrieb mit flüssigkeits- und erdgestützter Ortsbrust. PhD thesis, TechnischenUniversität Carolo-Wilhelmina, Braunschweig, 1987.
Bibliography 171[99] E. Kreyszig. Advanced Engineering Mathematics. John Wiley & Sons, 1993.[100] O. Kusakabe, K. Fujita, and Y. Miyazaki, editors. Geotechnical Aspects of UndergroundConstruction in Soft Ground. Balkema, 2000.[101] E.A. Kwast and J.W. Plekkenpol. Deformaties van de grond, spanningsveranderingen in deomgeving en gronddrukken op de tunnellining. Interim report K100-W-002, BouwdienstRijkswaterstaat: Projectbureau Boortunnels, November 1995.[102] COB L320. Horizontaal sonderen met de prikneus, Europaterminal Antwerpen. TechnicalReport L320-05, Centrum Ondergronds Bouwen, 1999.[103] COB L500. L500 toetsingsrichtlijn voor het ontwerp van boortunnels voor weg- enrailinfrastructuur. Technical report, Centrum Ondergronds Bouwen, 2000.[104] G. de Lange. Additioneel grondonderzoek Tweede Heinenoordtunnel. Technical ReportK100-W-006, Centrum Ondergronds Bouwen, 1995.[105] G. de Lange, J.K. Haasnoot, and F.W.J. van Vliet. Additioneel grondonderzoek II.Boorvloeistof, Tweede Heinenoordtunnel. Final report K100-W-027, Delft Geotechnics,March 1996.[106] E. Leca and L. Dormieux. Upper and lower bound solutions for the face stability ofshallow circular tunnels in frictional material. Géotechnique, 40(4):581–606, 1990.[107] J.N. Levadoux and M.M. Baligh. Consolidation after undrained piezocone penetration.I: Prediction. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 112(7):707–726, July 1986.[108] T. Lunne, P.K. Robertson, and J.J.M. Powell. Cone Penetration Testing in GeotechnicalPractice. Blackie, London, 1997.[109] B. Maidl, M. Herrenknecht, and L. Anheuser. Mechanised Shield Tunnelling. Ernst,Berlin, 1996.[110] R.J. Mair. Design and construction of tunnels in soft ground. In Barends et al. [25], pages1915–1921.[111] R.J. Mair and R.N. Taylor, editors. Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Constructionin Soft Ground, Rotterdam, 1996. Balkema.[112] R.J. Mair and R.N. Taylor. Theme lecture: Bored tunnelling in the urban environment.In of XIV ICSMFE [131], pages 2353–2385.[113] S. Marchetti. In situ tests by flat dilatometer. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and GeoenvironmentalEngineering, 109:299–321, March 1980.[114] S. Marchetti. Detection of liquefiable sand layers by means of quasi-static penetrationtests. In Verruijt et al. [169], pages 689–695.[115] W. Meyer, R.L. Schuster, and M.A. Sabot. Potential for seepage erosion of landslide dam.ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(7):1211–1229, 1994.[116] J.K. Mitchell and T.L. Brandon. Analysis and use of CPT in earthquake and environmentalengineering. In Robertson and Mayne [143], pages 69–97.
Page 1:
Tunnel Face Stability&New CPT Appli
Page 4 and 5:
Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd doo
Page 6 and 7:
viAcknowledgementsKolla här, min
Page 8 and 9:
viiiAbstractThe tunnel wound on and
Page 10 and 11:
xContents3.2.4 Finite Element Model
Page 12 and 13:
xiiList of Symbols× ij i = j norma
Page 14:
xivList of Symbolsλfirst Lamé con
Page 17 and 18:
1.2. Outline of this Thesis 3suppor
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 2Stability Analysis of the
Page 21 and 22:
2.1. Introduction 7fluidsoilzs Fα
Page 23 and 24:
2.1. Introduction 9Figure 2.3: Unsu
Page 25 and 26:
2.1. Introduction 11q sq sq sααα
Page 27 and 28:
φ = 40 ◦φ = 35 ◦2.1. Introduc
Page 29 and 30:
2.1. Introduction 15T 1 T 1E1 E 1G
Page 31 and 32:
2.1. Introduction 17N Deformation<
Page 33 and 34:
2.1. Introduction 19GC45 ◦ + φ/2
Page 35 and 36:
2.1. Introduction 21Figure 2.19: Ce
Page 37 and 38:
2.1. Introduction 23Figure 2.21: In
Page 39 and 40:
2.1. Introduction 25D (m) Soil type
Page 41 and 42:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 27the su
Page 43 and 44:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 29xyhz =
Page 45 and 46:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 31s ′
Page 47 and 48:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 33q 02ad
Page 49 and 50:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 35200400
Page 51 and 52:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 37with a
Page 53 and 54:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 39s(z t
Page 55 and 56:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 41∆p f
Page 57 and 58:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 43has be
Page 59 and 60:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 45from t
Page 61 and 62:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 47γF(t/
Page 63 and 64:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 49s min
Page 65 and 66:
2.2. Wedge Stability Model 5140∆s
Page 67 and 68:
2.3. Model Sensitivity Analysis 53P
Page 69 and 70:
2.3. Model Sensitivity Analysis 55i
Page 71 and 72:
2.3. Model Sensitivity Analysis 57
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
2.3. Model Sensitivity Analysis 63t
Page 79 and 80:
2.3. Model Sensitivity Analysis 65o
Page 81 and 82:
2.4. Comparison with Field Cases 67
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Figure 2.57: Overview of soil strat
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
2.5. Further Groundwater Influences
Page 111 and 112:
2.6. Conclusions 97the effective st
Page 113 and 114:
2.6. Conclusions 99has been made th
Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 3Horizontal Cone Penetratio
Page 117 and 118:
3.2. Interpretation of Cone Penetra
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
3.3. Calibration Chamber Tests on S
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134: 3.3. Calibration Chamber Tests on S
Page 143 and 144: 3.4. Scale Model Tests 129Figure 3.
Page 145 and 146: 3.4. Scale Model Tests 1315210Figur
Page 147 and 148: 3.5. Field Tests 133Figure 3.35: Pl
Page 149 and 150: 3.6. Modelling Horizontal Cone Pene
Page 155 and 156: 3.7. Conclusions 141W H/V 043Ticino
Page 157 and 158: Chapter 4High-Speed Piezocone Tests
Page 159 and 160: 4.2. Determination of Liquefaction
Page 161 and 162: 4.2. Determination of Liquefaction
Page 163 and 164: 4.4. Calibration Chamber Tests 149
Page 165 and 166: 4.4. Calibration Chamber Tests 1518
Page 167 and 168: 4.4. Calibration Chamber Tests 153v
Page 169 and 170: 4.4. Calibration Chamber Tests 155-
Page 171 and 172: 4.5. Conclusions and Recommendation
Page 173 and 174: 4.5. Conclusions and Recommendation
Page 175 and 176: Chapter 5Conclusions and Recommenda
Page 177 and 178: 5. Conclusions and Recommendations
Page 179 and 180: Bibliography[1] M.Y. Abu-Farsakh, G
Page 181 and 182: Bibliography 167[30] B. Belter, W.
Page 183: Bibliography 169[65] J.K. van Deen.
Page 187 and 188: Bibliography 173[133] Committee on
Page 189 and 190: Bibliography 175[171] F.W.J. van Vl
Page 191 and 192: Curriculum VitaeWout Broere was bor
Page 193 and 194: SamenvattingGraaffrontstabiliteit &
Page 195 and 196: Samenvatting 181spanningen ook in d
Page 197 and 198: NawoordIn de afgelopen jaren heb ik
Page 199 and 200: Appendix ABasic Equations of Ground
Page 201 and 202: A.1. Semi-confined System of Aquife
Page 203 and 204: A.2. Transient Flow 189withS s the
Page 205 and 206: ....Appendix BBasic Equations of El
Page 207: B. Basic Equations of Elasticity 19
show all

Tunnel Face Stability & New CPT Applications - Geo-Engineering

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?