13.07.2015 Views

The Impact of Direct Democracy on Society - Universität St.Gallen

The Impact of Direct Democracy on Society - Universität St.Gallen

The Impact of Direct Democracy on Society - Universität St.Gallen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

– 48 –also introduced in the case that a quarter <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all members <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the cant<strong>on</strong>al parliament demandedit (art. 62, 1 lit. b CC). In the course <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this revisi<strong>on</strong>, article 62 was appended a letter ‘e’ (art.62, 1 e CC), which extends the mandatory statutory referendum to decrees <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Grosser Rat(according to art. 63, 1 lit. b - d and f CC). This extensi<strong>on</strong> means that this referendum is nowapplicable to decrees to which, prior to its revisi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>on</strong>ly the opti<strong>on</strong>al referendum applied. Itsc<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al requirement is, again, that decrees have been passed with a majority below theabsolute majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Grosser Rat. Analogously to art. 62, 1 lit. b CC, the extraordinarymandatory referendum was also applicable to such decrees. Given that the index <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> directdemocracy assigns a higher value to a mandatory statutory referendum than to an opti<strong>on</strong>alstatutory referendum, a decline in the index will be induced by the new majority requirement.Am<strong>on</strong>g the remaining cant<strong>on</strong>s, Tessin, Waadt and Neuenburg adopted new c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s in1998, 2003, and 2002, respectively. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se, however, did not bring about any changes withrespect to the n<strong>on</strong>existence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the mandatory statutory referendum for cant<strong>on</strong>al laws. Hence,the degree <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> direct democracy as measured by the index was not affected.4.3 Opti<strong>on</strong>al <strong>St</strong>atutory ReferendumCant<strong>on</strong>Zürich(30 Mar 2004)Table 5: Opti<strong>on</strong>al <strong>St</strong>atutory Referendum Between 1997 and 2003Signature Time-limit for Articles in cant.requirement collecti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>st.Effective since5,000 60 days art. 30 bis, 1 1 Jan 1999(27 Sept 1998)Zürich(old)Bern(21 Oct 2003)Luzern(21 Oct 2003)Uri(1 Apr 2003)Uri(old)Mandatory statutoryreferendumSee table 410,000 3 m<strong>on</strong>ths art. 62, 2 1 Jan 1995(6 June 1993)3,000 60 days art. 39, 1 1 Nov 1969 (art. 40, 1)art. 40, 1450 90 days art. 25, 1art. 25, 2 lit. b1 Jan 1977 (art. 39, 1)1 Oct 1997(8 Jun 1997)For by-laws;mandatory stat. ref. forlaws see table 4300 90 days art. 25, 1 Only for by-laws(see T/S 1999, p. 359)(1985)mandatory stat. ref. forlaws see table 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!