13.07.2015 Views

The Impact of Direct Democracy on Society - Universität St.Gallen

The Impact of Direct Democracy on Society - Universität St.Gallen

The Impact of Direct Democracy on Society - Universität St.Gallen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

– 24 –2 C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al Changes between 1997 and 2003<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> time span between 1997 and 2003 appears to have been a period favoring the adopti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>new c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s. Table 2.1 displays a list <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all 26 cant<strong>on</strong>s and their c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al changesthat affect those direct democratic instituti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> which the index <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> direct democracy isbased (state: 18th <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> August, 2004). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> cant<strong>on</strong>s FR, SH, SG, GR, TI, VD, and NE – about<strong>on</strong>e fourth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all Swiss cant<strong>on</strong>s – all passed new, totally revised c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s between 1997and 2004 (the cant<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> LU is also currently drafting a new c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>, which should bevoted up<strong>on</strong> in 2007 45 ). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> reas<strong>on</strong> for this 'clustering' could lie both in a "Year 2000" effectcombined with a "200-years jubilee" effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> membership in the Swiss federati<strong>on</strong>, whichemerged from a c<strong>on</strong>federati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> single independent states. However, not all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these newc<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s necessarily brought about alterati<strong>on</strong>s in the existing direct democraticinstituti<strong>on</strong>s: some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the new c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s aimed primarily at rewriting the outdatednineteenth-century wording and giving it a more modern structure without altering its legalc<strong>on</strong>tent. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> rest <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this secti<strong>on</strong> is devoted to an assessment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the amendments in thec<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al stipulati<strong>on</strong>s.With respect to the mandatory and opti<strong>on</strong>al statutory referendum, there is a weakening <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> thedirect democratic instituti<strong>on</strong> through a shift <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the political power from the electorate towardthe cant<strong>on</strong>al parliament. Quite <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten, the applicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the mandatory statutory referendumhas been restricted by the inclusi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a majority requirement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the cant<strong>on</strong>al parliament in thec<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> (SO, BL, SH, AG) or by restricti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the issues to be regulated through legalstipulati<strong>on</strong> (GL) 46. Alternatively, the mandatory statutory referendum has been completelyabolished and replaced by an opti<strong>on</strong>al statutory referendum, as happened in four cant<strong>on</strong>s (ZH,OW, AR, GR (2004)). In general, such changes lead to a decline in the index <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> directdemocracy in these cant<strong>on</strong>s.45See www.neueverfassung.lu.ch (7/10/2004) and pers<strong>on</strong>al communicati<strong>on</strong> with Mr. ZEMP (20/04/2005).46 In case the majority restricti<strong>on</strong> serves <strong>on</strong>ly as a means for disciplining the cant<strong>on</strong>al parliament, the introducti<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> such a majority restricti<strong>on</strong> has to be regarded as equivalent to a de facto eliminati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the mandatoryreferendum. Only observati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the daily political usage over a l<strong>on</strong>ger period <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> time can provide a basis fora correct evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this instituti<strong>on</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!