Catheterisation in Adults - the Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Tenke P et al (2012) Update on biofilm infections in the urinary tract World Journal ofUrology Volume 30, Number 1 (2012), 51-579 Further selected referencesEichhorst A M; Janken J K & Mullen T M (1997) The therapeutic value of cranberries intreating and preventing urinary tract infections The Online Journal of Knowledge Synthesisfor Nursing Vol 4; Document No 2Fader M; Pettersson L; Brooks R et al (1997) A multicentre comparative evaluation ofcatheter valves British Journal of Nursing Vol 6; No 7; 359-367German K; Rowley P; Stone D et al (1997) A randomized cross-over study comparing theuse of a catheter valve and a leg-bag in urethrally catheterized male patients British Journalof Urology 79 96-98Getliffe K (2002) Managing recurrent urinary catheter encrustation British Journal ofCommunity Nursing Vol 7; No 11; 574-580Khan A A , Mathur S, Feneley R & Timoney A G (2007) Developing a strategy to reducethe high morbidity of patients with long-term urinary catheters: the BioMed catheter researchclinic. British Journal of Urology International, 100: 1298-1301Maki D G & Tambyah P A (2001) Engineering out the risk of infection with urinary catheters.Emerging Infectious Diseases, 7: 1-6Nyman M H, Johansson J-E & Gustafsson M (2010) A randomised controlled trial on theeffect of clamping the indwelling urinary catheter in patients with hip fracture Journal ofClinical Nursing 19, 405-413Peate I (2001) Patient management following suprapubic catheterisation In: Management ofContinence and Urinary Catheter Care edited by Cruickshank J P & Woodward S; BJNMonograph; Mark Allen Publishing LtdRaz R, Schiller D & Nicolle L E (1998) Replacement of catheter improves the outcome ofpatients with permanent urinary catheter and symptomatic bacteriuria. Abstracts, 38th.Annual ICAAC, San Diego, California.Tambyah P A, Halvorson K T & Maki D G (1999) Prospective Study of Pathogenesis ofCatheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 74:131-13616 of 16
Equality Impact Assessment ToolTo be completed and attached to any procedural document when submitted to theappropriate committee for consideration and approval.Yes √No XComments1. Does the document/guidance affect onegroup less or more favourably than anotheron the basis of: Race X Ethnic origins (including gypsies andtravellers)X Nationality X Gender X Culture X Religion or belief XSexual orientation including lesbian, gay,transgender and bisexual peopleX Age X Disability - learning disabilities, physicaldisability, sensory impairment and mentalhealth problems2. Is there any evidence that some groups areaffected differently?3. If you have identified potentialdiscrimination, are there any exceptionsvalid, legal and/or justifiable?4. Is the impact of the document/guidancelikely to be negative?XXN/AX5. If so, can the impact be avoided? N/A6. What alternative is there to achieving thedocument/guidance without the impact?7. Can we reduce the impact by takingdifferent action?N/AN/AIf you have identified a potential discriminatory impact of this procedural document, pleaserefer it to the Equality and Diversity lead, together with any suggestions as to the actionrequired to avoid/reduce this impact.For advice in respect of answering the above questions,please contact the Equality and Diversity lead.V1-0 Page 1 of 1 6-Mar-13
Page 3: Patients will have their urinary ca
Page 9 and 10: lumen, or causing excessive constri
Page 11 and 12: 4.25 Catheter Maintenance Solutions
Page 13 and 14: Fax: 01726 2912495 Risk Management
Page 15: Catheter and catheter care policies

Catheterisation in Adults - the Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?