St. Elizabeth's West Campus - GSA Development of St. Elizabeths ...

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmI. Welcome and Introductions (CI International)Connie Doyle (CI): Welcomed the group to the meeting.Group: (Participants introduced themselves. Attendance list attached.)II. Project Updates- Global Project Updates (GSA)Thom Ennen (GSA): Coast Guard construction - concrete work in the garage is complete, there is still work atgate 4, the fence project is twenty percent complete, heating and cooling and pipe install is ongoing andutilities is fifty two percent complete. Electrical work in progress, seventy five percent of bottom slab pouredand the framing walls are next. The Washington Gas Project is thirty eight percent complete. Regardingadaptive reuse of building 31, slabs are poured up to the second floor and mechanical up to first floor. Building37 in progress and building 49 is emerging from moth ball state. Things are moving along.Some community related announcements; there was a golf tournament played two weeks ago on that very rainThursday. $14,000 was donated to a place call The House, a program for high school kids. Also, the Ward 8beautification program received support. Hometown Solutions renovated a building used for intake for awomen’s shelter.Thomas Otto (GSA): Last month we mentioned how we would be getting back the gravestone. [SLIDE]Yesterday there was a ceremony, the stone was returned. The DCA brochure, you have it there, 5,000 copieshave been reproduced. We distribute them during tours. I had a very productive Anacostia meeting; we aregoing to talk to them about posting things online for the oral history project. We are talking about having acommunity forum. It’s been a good week on the interpretive sideJames Bunn (Ward 8 Business Council): Ward 8 really appreciated GSA’s assistanceNancy Witherell (GSA): The design of the interim stair and the final design to the access road have all beenapproved. The building 49 addition with underground portion of the gym, we pulled that back from submissionsto both review agencies; it will go back to both agencies for review. We don’t anticipate having a Decemberconsultation meeting the next meeting will be in January. We are working with Parks to get going on an outlinefor Shepherd Parkway MOA. We will be sending drafts out during Nov, Dec, and January. It should be apretty straightforward MOA that will outline future process for parkway design. I think that’s it unless there arequestionsIII. Shepherd Parkway Transportation Alternatives PresentationNia Francis (GSA): As we mentioned previously GSA and DDOT concurred on the preferred hybridalternative and we want to talk about why we identified 2B as the preferred alternative. We were not able toget the crash data document so we will not have that today. In three months, CPs will get courtesy electroniccopies of the FEIS for a five day review. HNTB did develop visualizations and an update will be provided. Ithink that’s it we will have HNTB begin. [SLIDE]Page 1 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmJon Whitney (HNTB): We want to revisit some of the questions from the last meeting and the evaluationprocess for hybrid alternatives. The purpose for these alternatives is to minimize footprints and addresscomments from the community and GSA. Alternative 2B has been identified because Least amount of parkland impact – 8.9 acres Best address of traffic movements, efficient access for DHS, JBAB and the community, traffic safetyand operations through the corridor DDOT identified 2B Early support from FHWA Headquarters and Division offices and no design exceptions increases ourlikelihood for the design getting approved during IJR process Protects the integrity of the design and the achievements obtained through the 106 processDDOT also identified 2B as their preferred; 2B is one of the alternatives that do not have design exceptions.The Interchange design process begins with the preferred alternative then review by GSA and NCPC approvalthen approval by FHWA. The Interchange Justification Report (IJR) will go to DDOT then FHWA for approval.After further review a final design will be approved. [SLIDE] To refresh you memory on 2B in southbounddirection we have an exit ramp, then we have an access road that flies over, north toward gate 4. There is a144 radius loop ramp. [SLIDE] To the south end we have the same South Capitol street interchange, splitranch. All four south end configurations are the same. [SLIDE] One of the questions was, can we minimizelane widths? Yellow is the access road, the intersection has three 11 foot lanes going towards gate 4. Thereason is to meet lane width requirements and also to accommodate transit or over the road coaches and alsoto accommodate a broken down vehicle. Here are two 12 foot lanes as we approach Malcolm X then for thebulk of the access road 11 foot lanes.Peter May (NPS): Will you explain why ramp A is 16 ft?Jon Whitney (HNTB): It’s to maintain the ability to pass a stalled vehicle. This meets the requirements for thepassing of a stalled vehicle without blocking the roadway. Also, if a transit bus is stalled out. The single ramplanes going toward the north all have a 16 ft plus shoulderPeter May (NPS): How much is the shoulder?Jon Whitney (HNTB): 6 ft on the left and 8 ft on the rightPeter May (NPS): How much do you need to get by?Jon Whitney (HNTB): There is a minimum requirement for passing AASHTO criteria.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): Aren’t there guidelines?Jon Whitney (HNTB): FHWA has established 13 criteria and if you don’t meet AASHTO requirements itrequires a design exception. If you add a design exception you jeopardize approval.Page 2 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmPeter May (NPS): Are you saying, 6 and 8 ft are minimum requirements and anything less requires anexception?Jon Whitney (HNTB): YesBetsy Merritt (National Trust): What is the configuration?Jon Whitney (HNTB): This section through the access road is what we consider a city street configuration withcurbs on each side and w/ pedestrian space on each side.Betsy Merritt (National Trust): Why couldn’t the 16 ft be changed to 12 ft with 6 and 8 ft shoulders?Jon Whitney (HNTB): The total width from barrier to barrier is the criteria for the passing of stalled vehicles.Betsy Merritt (National Trust): On the ramp, what allows it to change from dark orange to light orange?Jon Whitney (HNTB): It is two lanes.Betsy Merritt (National Trust): How many exceptions are incorporated into the proposal?Jon Whitney (HNTB): noneBetsy Merritt (National Trust): My suggestion is, let’s put a place holder to request a minor exception here.Jamie Henson (DDOT): We are allowing construction and about 15ft is on DDOT property including one of thetwo lanes. Secondly, we are showing a very atypical design which increases our maintenance responsibility.This design we have eliminated about 50 feet of impact. Instead of allowing exceptions we’ve tried for thesafest possible design.Betsy Merritt (National Trust): I think you are just hearing the negative reaction.Jamie Henson (DDOT): From our perspective these are national standards, so we are really hesitant tochange those standards.Jack Van Dop (FHWA): FHWA places national standards. This is an unconventional interchange. We wantto stay out of Shepherd Parkway and minimize the impact on Shepherd Parkway.Carlton Hart (NCPC): Are you not looking at doing any design exceptions at all?Nia Francis (GSA): As DDOT says, we are comfortable with the 2B alternative and it just so happens; it doesnot have any design exceptions. This is what they are comfortable with.Connie Doyle (CI International): Carlton will you restate your question for Jamie?Page 3 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmCarlton Hart (NCPC): I asked if you are not planning to include any design exceptions at all?Jamie Henson (DDOT): The Chief engineer ultimately signs off on design exceptions. Generally I can say weare not interested in signing off on design exceptions however; I will let the Chief Engineer speak more aboutthat.Tammy Stidham (NPS): Are you considering that ramp part of the interstate?Nia Francis (GSA): We colored it orange because it’s a single ramp. Coloring is not always part of theinterstate.Jon Whitney (HNTB): It is a one way single lane ramp, we are trying to maintain that consistent criteria. Idon’t think a decision has been made regarding which ramps are part of the interstate.Jack Van Dop (FHWA) Our mission requires us to look at things to minimize harm. That will be an openquestion with DDOT’s lead but; at this point I don’t think we will get an exception on that.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): Regarding the Interstate Justification Report (IJR), will we receive it forreview?Nia Francis (GSA): No, you will receive the EIS.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): So you all at DDOT would need to approve the exceptions first beforesubmitting them to FHWA?Jamie Henson (DDOT): We would need to review and consider it before submitting it to FHWA.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): Will design exceptions affect funding?Jamie Henson (DDOT): Its not that it will affect funding. There is a reason there are standards, and theconcern is making exceptions from the standards.Jon Whitney (HNTB): As we develop the plans with traffic modeling, Nia, when will be able to show thatinformation as we progress through design?Nia Francis (GSA): When we are doing the final design MOA it comes back, we are happy to provide a statusupdate.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): We have a liaison; I’m just not sure how the process works. Is today thechance for us to provide comments?Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): Can I jump here? The IJR is not to be used by other agencies. Allthese issues have to be taken care of in the EIS process.Page 4 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmNia Francis (GSA): That is consistent with what I said regarding the process. We can go back to the slidethat shows the process.Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): The preferred alternative is what will go forward. Hopefully there isless of a chance of any change.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): When will we get the EIS for comment?Nia Francis (GSA): Late JanuaryKirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): So perhaps we can have a meeting around that time?Nia Francis (GSA): We have an early January meeting scheduled, the EIS is late January.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): The IJR from my perspective, I’m not really sure what it is.Nia Francis (GSA): I think this is getting a little confusing; your opportunity to comment is on the final EIS.Tammy Stidham (NPS): So this is the only opportunity to comment, before the final EIS?Nia Francis (GSA): Then it goes through the IJR process.Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): The IJR, it’s not a public document.Nia Francis (GSA): I think what Kirsten is interested in understanding is if there is an opportunity to considermore design exceptions.Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone) The IJR process will operationally analyze on a bigger level andthen based on those details we will know if it will operationally work. I think we have minimized the designexceptions as much as we could. I think there is already one exception on the interchange. We will have to gothrough a very long tedious process for approval of additional design exceptions. There is also liability toconsider because there are national standard criteria. I think we have tried to squeeze in what we can and Ithink we are at a point that we’ve done all we can. You have to look at the safe operations, we haveaccommodated as many design exceptions as we can I believe.James Bunn (Ward 8 Business Council): We looked at all the possibilities and DDOT had allowed someexception because those exceptions were allowed in other places around the country. I’m not in favor ofconstantly having meetings when I’m hearing that DDOT and GSA have done all they can to mitigate concern.Jamie Henson (DDOT): So are we clear on the design exception process, it’s arduous. In lieu of designexceptions, we allowed the interchange partially in our right of way and the unique design of a fly over acrossthe loop ramp which is atypical. This is our contribution to minimizing footprint.Page 5 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmCarlton Hart (NCPC): I guess the issue that I am not hearing is when we are looking at lane widths; Iunderstand accommodating broken down vehicles. I am just not understanding the criteria; we think it’s awide street, the road plus the shoulder is wide. Is it because during winter only certain areas are plowed? Isthere something else that dictates this standard? Peter said 30 ft is wide. We have to understand.Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): Which one are we discussing?Carlton Hart (NCPC): This is ramp A, going to the west campus access road. This is being presented to us asthis is where we are and this is what it will be and not what it can be. Is there further discussion we can have?Jamie Henson (DDOT): We are talking about the single lane to surface road, 6ft on the left. The question is,why does it have to be 30ft for a single lane?Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): I don’t have the latest drawing with the alphabet.Carlton Hart (NCPC): It’s the eastern lanes.Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone: If you want to explain the road, in terms of the ramps they are partof the interstate.Jon Whitney (HNTB): Not necessarily part of the interstate system. AASHTO has a curb to curb minimumdepending on design to allow for passing of stalled vehicles. It’s basically a table in the green book. Also, itdepends on the horizontal alignment to maintain operations.Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): One more foot or two feet, is that what this conversation is about?Nia Francis (GSA): Yes, shoulder or lane reductionsFaisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): For safe operation of the system itself, we may not make thosechanges. Again, based on standards, based on good rationale, this will not only be used by cars but also 18wheelers. I think we have already looked into that to some degree. The entire operation of the system fails ifthe standards are in place. We are already incorporating the bare minimums of for design standards. This ismuch smaller than what was presented months ago.Tammy Stidham (NPS): Keep in mind that our goal is to minimize.Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): Yes but we still have to look at not compromising the safety of thesystem which is most important to us.Tammy Stidham (NPS): Also, keep in mind we are not talking about a freeway, we are talking about busesthat will be creeping along towards gate 4.Page 6 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmFaisal Hameed (DDOT): Remember this is a 24 hour facility for the community as well so we are responsiblefor making it work for everyone in the communityTammy Stidham (NPS): But the ramp that started this conversation is ramp “A” which will not be used by thecommunity.Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): Has that been decided Nia? One day it will be transferred over tothe city which will pose a problem if we have to do it all over again.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): I am asking for a more procedural question. Will we be able to see a finaldesign after FHWA approval and engage in further discussion?Jamie Henson (DDOT): What happens if during the IJR process there is a change in design?Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): The worst case scenarioNia Francis (GSA): Before the IJR, we are drafting and submitting concurrently. We anticipate the IJR will benearly complete by the time GSA is done with its process. It should really be the same alignment.Rob Prunty (CH2M Hill): What we hope to do is work through the 106 process and what is turned into FHWAheadquarters. If they come back and say we cannot move forward with a design and we go back to thedrawing table, you can get into a cycle of a significant re-evaluation. We are trying to avoid not gettingapproval by headquarters because of design exceptions.Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): If we make a serious change in the design, it will be reviewedagain. That is part of the process.Nancy Witherell (GSA): Do you consider the work that you’ve done to be your minimization? I would like tohave more information for visualizationFaisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): I think Nia or Jack can walk through that, it’s a huge change, andthere has been a serious look at minimizing.Nancy Witherell (GSA): I just wanted to get your assurance that you feel it is sufficient minimizing.Faisal Hameed (DDOT joined by phone): Yes, I think this is really where DDOT is.Nia Francis (GSA): Thanks Faisal, ok we can continue Jon [SLIDE]Jon Whitney (HNTB): We have retaining walls to minimize impact and parkland footprint. Zero to 5 is blue; 5-10 is green increasing up to 32 feet. The walls between bridges are quite high, and drop off in the center ofloop ramps. Along southbound 295 ramp, walls get higher. There is another wall on the parkland side toPage 7 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmminimize [SLIDE] The northbound ramp walls get high [SLIDE] Here are cross sections. The previous versionhad these locations. You can see the effort to move everything towards the westPeter May (NPS): Is there anything that shows a cut or a fill?Jon Whitney (HNTB): We don’t have a cross section developed for the entire section of the road.Peter May (NPS): The colors are all over the place. Could you have used shades of the same color to make iteasier to understand what this really means?Sarah Batcheler (CFA): Sort of like an altitude map?Peter May (NPS): It would also be helpful to use the same chromatic range and then shift into different colors.Jon Whitney (HNTB): OKNia Francis (GSA): We can do that and put it up on our website so that you can have it this weekSarah Batcheler (CFA): It’s a lot to process and figure out. I can’t really respond except to say that it doeslook like a lot of tall walls. Understanding the affects of the lane width discussion would be helpful.Jon Whitney (HNTB): I think you may get a combination of shorter or taller walls. There is no way to tell.Sarah Batcheler (CFA): Part of the problem is not just cut and fill. It’s hard on this plan to understand whenyou have six walls in a row, to see what is doing what.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): If we are looking from the houses what would you see?Sarah Batcheler (CFA): Which way is the wall retaining? It’s really hard to respond the way it is now.Connie Doyle (CI International): Peter any additional questions?Peter May (NPS): We may actually want to lay back rather than do retaining walls. I would expect that we willlook at some combination of laying back and retaining walls and what is actually being retained. It has to bevery circumstantialKirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): Will we have another chance to respond? I’m still trying to understand theprocess.Nia Francis (GSA): It’s important to understand that this is a conceptual design meetingConnie Doyle (CI International): OK, please continue [SLIDE]Page 8 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmdesign concept [SLIDE] This is the campus site, to give you the big picture view [SLIDE] The piece will hangover the piece in the centerThomas Luebke (CFA): l see the city of New York in the backgroundChristine Ewing (GSA): This is in his studio and he is modifying it for the siteThomas Luebke (CFA): So it has already been made?Christine Ewing (GSA): Yes it has and he decided it is fitting for the site. We have to approve the final design.Jane Engvall (DHS): Will you describe the process of the panel and artist selection.Christine Ewing (GSA): The panel has not seen this yet. They last met to select the artist. He will thenpresent again to the Art in Architecture panel which includes curators, directors, myself etc. We meet threetimes; the last time is to select the design.The next artist is Teresita Fernández a contemporary sculptor. Her work is characterized by an interest inperception and the psychology of looking. [SLIDE] She received a Guggenheim Fellowship in 2003 and she isrepresented by the Lehmann Maupin Gallery. [SLIDE] She is exploring the relationship between nature and art.She was selected by President Obama to become a member of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts. She hasreceived many awards included the MacArthur Genius Award. Just today I received a drawing of where shewants to place the art on the Coast Guard wall. She has not submitted idea yet. We will hear more from her[SLIDE]The next artist, An-My Lê, her art examines the impact, consequences, and representation of war. [SLIDE] herpictures frame a tension between the natural landscape and its violent transformation into battlefields [SLIDE]Lê explores the disjunction between wars as historical events and the ubiquitous representation of war incontemporary entertainment, politics, and collective consciousness. She has received many awards includingfellowships from the Guggenheim memorial Foundation and the NY Foundation for the arts. [SLIDE] We don’tdo a lot of photographers so; she is unique. She will schedule trips to take the photos. She has been approvedand will take trips with the Coast Guard to take photos, about 27 photos. Until they are done we are not surewhere they will go.We are planning to have this completed by 2013 by the completion of the buildingThomas Luebke (CFA): It goes through our review processChristine Ewing (GSA): YesThomas Luebke (CFA): What is the Art in Architecture process?Christine Luebke (CFA): We have a panel process that makes a selectionPage 11 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmThomas Luebke (CFA): So in a way its juryIII. (Cont.) Shepherd Parkway Transportation Alternatives Presentation - Cultural Resources ImpactAssessmentCharles Cheek (John Milner Associates): I will talk about resources at I-295/Malcolm X Avenue,archeological site 51 and Oak Tree – 65 inch caliper. Also resources at Southern section of access road,archeological site 51 SE, Civil War Road and grove of older trees [SLIDE] I will show you the differencesbetween “A” variance and “B” variance. In 1A the interchange is pushed into the site 2A has less of an impactbecause it is pushed back. B alternatives have a lesser impact. They are pulled down to the west [SLIDE]This is the difference between alternative 2 and hybrid alternative 2B. Alternative 2 the road goes right throughthe center of the site. Alternative 2B had a much tighter ramp than Alternative 2. Using GIS, this Alternativesaves 3,800 sq. feet. [SLIDE] The originally disturbed area extended between 42 to 50 linear feet from theedge of the existing road. Minimization reduced that to 25 feet from the edge of existing road. The grove ofolder trees originally the entire grove is impacted. Minimization preserves more than half. [SLIDE] The Oaktree will be impacted equally by all alternatives. Eligible archeological site will be impacted about 3,800 sq.feet less by Alternate 2B than by Alternate 2. On the Southern section of the access road, both resources willhave less impact.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): At the mid November 2010 meeting and the last meeting, I made a commentregarding adverse affects to the historic homes, if there are historic homes in Boling?Charles Cheek (JMA): We did address that now that you mention. I think we were not allowed to access thisarea (Comparison of hybrid alt slide)Nia Francis (GSA): The issue is the wall and trees, I don’t know if there will be seasonal views. They’rerelatively close to the read. I can’t say for sure. One of the GSA people who has been on the site said youcan’t see but we can’t say for sure.Carlton Hart (NCPC): If you need some kind of contact over there I have one.Nia Francis (GSA): It’s a specific area that we do not have access toCarlton Hart (NCPC): We’ve had access; if you need a contact let me know.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): We asked about a year ago so if you would let us know that would be great.III. (Cont.) Shepherd Parkway Transportation Alternatives Presentation – DHS Master Plan AmendmentJon Whitney (HNTB): We used the same positioning on the views; you may remember what was done in thepast. The first is photo 5 looking westbound. [SLIDE] The next picture is with the access road and this is theramp B going to Malcolm X [SLIDE] and this is an annotated version [SLIDE] We are looking eastbound fromMalcolm X; this is the bridge over South Capitol street [SLIDE] Next will show a new bridge and southbound295 ramp. It looks like it is going up in grade. To get to the T ramp on 295, it is slightly going up in elevation.[SLIDE] Going north [SLIDE]. You have an access ramp going northbound. You will have a signalizedPage 12 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmintersection here [SLIDE] Further south at the entrance of the South Capitol street ramp, this ramp was a littlefurther back. The wall does rise in elevation a bit because of proximity and there is no room to do any grading.Crossing over South Capitol Street on this ramp.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): On page 44, you were saying that bridge needs to be raisedJon Whitney (HNTB): Look at slide number 6, I think, this one, the southbound 295 ramp will to go to the Tintersection. The grade is actually going up towards this bridge high enough to get over 295 where it crossesover.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): To the right of this pictureJon Whitney (HNTB): You can see a little bit off the edge. It’s heavily wooded along here; a retaining wallsystem is to protect the dense wooded areaKirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): I would like to get more information about thatJon Whitney (HNTB): OK, you can see how dense the tree growth is there [SLIDE] The last image is image 9.The roads are completely reconfigured in this picture. Push a little further to the south and west. Ramp B thatties to the access road is to the right. Then you have the fly over from 295.Charles Cheek (JMA): Go back to slide number 8 [SLIDE] U-8, this particular view has a greater impact thanthe previous view. The other views are all basically the same with minor differences this one has the mostnoticeable change.V. Outstanding Issues and Wrap UpDanielle Breaux (GSA): I just want to open up for any questions regarding process and Shepherd Parkway. Iwill send an email around with updates. We are calling this a process MOA, we are still working through someof the details. There is another MOA that will be dealt with in the future after the EIS is completed. Then wewill go into a design phase.Nancy Witherell (GSA): and we will communicate by emailDanielle Breaux (GSA): We have to work out permission issues re Bolling; I don’t want you to think we haveforgotten.Kirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): So if you are addressing this in the January meeting and there are adverseaffects it may be tough to integrate them.Nia Francis (GSA): Why don’t we find out if they are historic?Nancy Witherell (GSA): They are because they are in the Boling AFB district.Page 13 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmKirsten Brinker-Kulis (ACHP): They are, so if there isn’t a wall then I would like to know if it is above andbeyond, we would like to provide comments on that for EIS.Nancy Witherell (GSA): This will require further consultation. I asked Faisal today I think they’ve reached aconsensus.Connie Doyle (CI International): The next meeting will be held on January 10, 2012 at 1:30pmPage 14 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmAttendance List11/08/11 First Name Last Name Org./Affiliation Telephone E-MailX Dawud Abdur-Rahman GSA 202 260-3368 dawud.abdur.rahman@gsa.govX Michael Abernathy GSA OIG 202-489-2031 Michael.abernathy@gsa.govAntonio Alonso GSA Antonio.alonso@gsa.govTom Amoroso AndropogonRichard Bartholomew WRT 215-772-1475 rbartholomew@ph.wrtdesign.comBill Bartling Clark Construction 202-359-6964 BillBartling@clarkconstruction.comX Sarah Batcheler CFA 202-504-2200 sbatcheler@cfa.govMark Bauman PWC / DHS 703-232-4837 mark.bauman@us.pwc.comCharles Bergen McKissack & McKissack 202-256-8142 Charles.Bergen@McKissackdc.comRick Borkowicz RMF 410-576-0505 borkowiczr@rmf.comX Danielle Breaux Turk Advisory 202-288-1298 daniellebreaux@turkadvisory.comWilliam Bresnick DHS/OGC 202-447-3545 william.bresnick@headquarters.dhs.govJoan Brierton GSA 202-244-7917 joan.brierton@gsa.govX Kirsten Brinker Kulis ACHP 202-606-8517 kkulis@achp.govJames Bunn Ward 8 BC 240-417-6320 Jbunnward8bus@aol.comRamona Burns WMATA 202-962-2880 rmburns@wmata.comJames Byrd W8BC 202-562-1671 jbyrdw8bc@aol.comBob Cannon DHS 202-713-7710 robert.cannon@dhs.govJean Carroon Goody Clancy/HDR 617-262-2760 jean.carroon@goodyclancy.comBruno Carvallio Caravllio & Good 202-857-7720 brunoc@carvalliogood.comRalph Casella DHS 202-510-4894 ralph.casella@associates.dhs.govJim Cassidy Parsons James.cassidy@parsons.comX Charles Cheek John Milner Associates 203-354-9737 ccheek@johnmilnerassociates.comChris Cherry GSA 202-252-0024 Christopher.cherry@gsa.govIan Chidister FHWA Ian.chidister@dot.govMina Clark Greenhorne & O’Mara 301-982-2999 mclark@g-and-o.comPaul Clinch Perkins+Will 312-755-4506 jpaul.clincy@perkinswill.comX Melissa Cohen GSA mcohen@cinnovas.comSam Condit McKissack & McKissack 202-347-1446 samc@mckissackdc.comOtto Condon XGF 202-380-3015 Otto.condon@zgf.comTom Coucter DHS 202-447-3005 Tom.coucter@associates.dhs.govEmily Creel GSA 202-501-4209 emily.creel@gsa.govBryana Davis GSA 202-205-9754 bryana.davis@gsa.govKelly Davis ZGF 803-706-9216 Kelly.davis@zgf.comPage 15 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmHarry Debes GSA 202-260-9583 harry.debes@gsa.govCharlie Delph DHS charliedelph@dhs.govMargie Debolt ZGF 202-380-3120 Margie.debolt@zgf.comPaula DeMuth GSA 202-708-9870 Paula.demuth@gsa.govTim Dennee DCSHPO 202-442-8847 Timonthy.dennee@dc.govDarren DeStefano GSA Darren.destefano@gsa.govDurwood Dixon WDG 202-857-8300 ddixon@wdg.arch.comX Connie Doyle CI International 301-275-7885 cdoyle@ciinternational.com301-216-9797Tim Duffy Leo A. Daly 202-955-9191 tjduffy@leoadaly.comShapour Ebadi GSA 202-302-4672 Shapour .ebadi@gsa.govBonnie Echoles GSA 202-441-2912 bonnie.echoles@gsa.govCaitlin Eichner NTHP 540-822-5649 Caitlin_eichner@nthp.orgStephanie Eiler Ch2m Hill 651-367-8543 Stephanie.eiler@ch2m.comKen Ellis WHGA 703-263-1900 kellis@whga.comX Jane Engvall DHS 202-447-5039 jane.engvall@dhs.gov202-591-0689X Thom Ennen GSA 602 708 6278 Thom.ennen@gsa.govJon Ericson Coast Guard 202-475-5602 jon.ericson@usCoast Guard.milX Christine Ewing GSA 202-504-4010 chriistine.ewing@gsa.govAaron Feldman-Gross Rhodeside & Harwell 703-683-7447 aaronfg@rhodeside-harwell.comAbigail Fiske DHS 202-684-5595 abigail.fiske@dhs.govTom Fleming HNTB 703-253-5875 tfleming@hntb.comKim R. Ford OVP/ST 202-395-3825 kford@omb.eop.govJim Fortinsky GSA 202-708-5976 james.fortinsky@gsa.gov202-329-1545X Nia Francis GSA 202-205-1937 nia.francis@gsa.govCarrie Gantt DOI 202-208-2424 Carrie.gantt@sol.doi.govRamon Garcia DHS 202-669-0667 ramon.garcia2@dhs.govGeraldine Gardner DCOP 202-442-8970 Geraldine.gardner@dc.govMichael Gerwin DHS 202-731-4234Lynn Goldfarb Perkins+Will 202-624-8323 Lynn.goldfarb@perkinswill.comSteve Goley LSA 301-948-2750 sgoley@lsassociates.netMarc Gravallese CI International 571-221-6749 mgravallese@ciinternational.comJana Gross GSA 202-208-1867 Jana.gross@gsa.govSusan Gygi HNTB 703-253-5850 sgygi@hntb.comX Faisal Hameed DDOT 202-671-2326 faisal.hameed@dc.govPage 16 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmKaren Handsfeld CEQ 202-456-5242 khandsfeld@ceq.eop.govX Carlton Hart NCPC 202-482-7252 carlton@ncpc.govSulaiman Harris GSA 202-744-3291 sharris@cinnouas.comDiane Hartley Clark 301-272-8279 Diane.hartley@clarkconstruction.comBill Hellmuth HOK 202-339-8819 bill.hellmuth@hok.comX Jamie Henson DDOT 202-671-1374 Jamie.henson@dc.govAlexander Hernandez NTHP 305-801-9722 alexander_hernanadez@nthp.orgArnold Hill GSAAl Himes WMATA 202-962-6245 ahimes@wmata.comJennifer Hirsch NCPC 202-482-7239 Jennifer.hirsch@ncpc.govAshley Howell SMA 703-354-9737 ahewell@johnmilnerassociates.comLisa Howe Goody Clancy 617-262-2760 lisa.howe@goodyclancy.comFrancis Jacobberger BAC Local 1 443-433-2422 fjacobberger@baclocal1.orgThomas Jester QEA 202-591-2537 tjester@quinnevans.comElizabeth Johnson GSA 202-708-7877 Elizabeth.johnson@gsa.govAram Kailian Leo A Daly 202-861-4600 AHKailian@leodaly.comScott Kamens GSA OIS 202-501-0163 Scott.kamens@gsoig.govJanet Crist Kausner 202-234-2333Jeremiah Kamerer WH Gordon 703-263-1900 jkamerer@whga.comJim Kane Forrester Construction 240-880-1926 jkane@forresterconstruction.comEvelyn Kasongo DCOP 202-442-7613 evelyn.kasongo@dc.govSteve Kelley WJE 312-560-0697 skelley@wje.comClarissa Kenney WJE 703-641-4601 ckenney@wje.comTim Kerr Robinson & Associates 202-234-2333 tkerr@robinson-inc.comGiri Kilim CH2M Hill 703-376-5227 Giri.kilim@ch2m.comJim Kinkead Clark Construction 301-367-0209 jim.kinkead@clarkconstruction.comDuncan Kirk HOK 202-944-1463 duncan.kirk@hok.comDan Koenig HDRPaul Kreisa Greenhorne & O’Mara 301-982-2866 pkreisa@g-and-o.comPage 17 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmStephanie Leedom GSA 202-420-9975 Stephanie.leedom@gsa.govJoyce Lewis DHS 202-343-4131 Joyce.lewis@dhs.govCarlos Linares CTL&A 301-576-2756 ctlinares@gmail.comJames Lindsay CI International 202-258-1772 jlindsay@ciinternational.comFrederick Lindstrom CFA 202-504-2200 flindstrom@cfa.govWilliam Logan US Coast Guard 202-475-5635 william.g.logan@usCoast Guard.milX Thomas Luebke CFA 202-504-2200 tluebke@cfa.govPaul Malatino GSA OIG 202-208-0021 paul.malatino@gsa.govMatt Manofsky US Coast Guard 202-372-4004 matthew.c.manofsky@usCoast Guard.milJulie Marburger NTHP 404-867-1719 Julie_marburger@nthp.orgJoshua Marnitz National Trust 202-588-6485 joshua_marnitz@nthp.orgGaftie Marlow GSA 202-380-8511 Gaftie.marlow@gsa.govX Peter May NPS 202-619-7025 Peter_may@nps.govAlana McCullough PWC / DHS 703-855-3541 Alana.mccullough@us.pwc.comJohn McDaniel GSA 202-205-8893 john.mcdaniel@gsa.govX Richard McDaniel FHWA 703-303-7523 richard.mcdaniel@dot.govRich McGruder DHS 202-834-4621 richard.McGruder@dhs.govJoe McNamara ZGF 202-380-3040 Joe.McNamara@zgf.comX Elizabeth Merritt National Trust 202-588-6026 betsy_merritt@nthp.orgEd Miller WashingtonGas/Honeywell 703-288-3614 emiller@wgas.comx15Chris Mills DHS 202-447-5032 chris.mills@dhs.govCarol Mitten DHS 202-282-8361 Carol.mitten@dhs.govCatherine Moore DHS Catherine.moore1@dhs.govBeate Moss DHS 202-713-7688 beate.moss@dhs.govThomas Mozina Perkins+ Will 312-755-4552 thomas.mozina@perkinswill.comReed Muehlman FPW 434-293-7258 rmuehlman@fpw.comDeborah Newburg NTHP 617-835-5760 Deborah_newburg@nthp.orgEdmund Newman GSA 202-401-2881 Edmund.newman@gsa.govRob Nieweg NTHP Robert_neiweg@nthp.orgAryan Nourazar GSA 703-507-6611 anourazar@proconconsulting.comPatricia O’Donnell Heritage Landscapes 802-425-4330 odonnell@heritagelandscapes.comJosepha O’Malley DOIRalph O’Mara-Garcia GSA 202-501-2635 ralph.omara-garcia@gsa.govGeorge Oberlander NCSOM 301-816-1153 goberlander@verizon.netAyako Okutani WRT 267-975-3948 aokutani@pj.wrtdesign.comPage 18 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmX Thomas Otto GSA 202-708-0090 Thomas.otto@gsa.govCarlos Ostria LSA 301-948-2750 costria@lsassociates.netMatt Oviatt Cinnovas Matt.oviatt@cinnovas.comThornell Page 202-258-2532Joseph Parello DHS 202-420-1971 joseph.parello@dhs.govGayatri Patel DOI 202-368-0638 Gayatri.patel@sol.doi.govEdward Payabyab NTHP 510-331-3865 edward_paabyab@nthp.orgSteve Pellman Honeywell 585-694-8184 Steve.pellman@honeywell.comDavin Pirkola Perkins+Will 312-755-0770 davin.pirkola@perkinswill.comDennis Plouff Greenhorne & O’Mara 301-270-2607 dplouff@g-and-o.comGary Porter GSA 202-205-7766 gary.porter@gsa.govKathryn Prigmore HDR 703-518-8511 Kathryn.prigmore@hdrinc.comX Rob Prunty CH2M Hill 571-296-0214 Rob.prunty@ch2m.comDavid Puckett FPW 434-293-7258 dpuckett@fpw.comFeras Qumseya DMPED 202-340-7264 Feras.qumseya@dc.govWilliam Randolph DHS USM/COS 202-497-5854 William.randolph@dhs.govChristine Reynolds WJE 703-641-4601 creynolds@wje.comElliot Rhodeside Rhodeside & Harwell 703-683-7447 elliotr@rhodeside-harwell.comVincent Rigg Perkins+Will 312-755-4794 vincent.rigg@perkinswill.comPeter Rizzo GSA 202-501-0940 peter.rizzo@gsa.govKevin Robbins DHS 202-525-9290 kevin.robbins@dhs.govJudith Robinson Robinson & Associates 202-234-2333 jrobinson@robinson-inc.comKelvin Robinson Symmetra Design 202-370-6000 krobinson@symmetradesign.comJennifer Rose HDR Jennifer.rose@hdrinc.comRay Ruhlman Leo A. Daly 202-955-9108 rruhlman@leoadaly.comBrittani Sanders GSA Brittani.sanders@gsa.govYogesh Saoji WRT 215-430-5309 ysaoji@ph.wrtdesign.comX Beth Savage GSA 202-208-1936 beth.savage@gsa.govKristina Schroeder FEMA 202-646-8178 Kristina.schroeder@dhs.govSteve Schwartz GSA 202-708-5905 stephen.schwartz@gsa.govGary Scott NPS 202-619-7279 gary_scott@nps.govMatthew Sellers STG 703-548-2000 msellers@stepgood.comGeorge Siekkinen GSA 202-501-0150 George .siekkinen@gsa.govPage 19 of 20

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting November 8, 2011Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 4:00pmBaird Smith QEA 202-591-2507 bsmith@quinnevans.comDavid Smith CHMS 202-345-3282 Pearlcoalition2chmsil.comPatrick Solomon HDR 703-752-7755 Patrick.solomon@hdrinc.comGeorge Stephanos US Coast Guard 202-475-5775 George .j.stephanos@usCoast Guard.milLajuan Stevens GSA 202-420-0598 Lajuan.stevens@gsa.govX Tammy Stidham NPS 202-619-7474 tammy_stidham@nps.govBetsy Strohecker Parsons 202-469-6458 Betsy.strohecker@parsons.comStacy Stone G2O 410-583-6700 sstone@g-ond.o.comGill Thompson DHS 202-680-2344 gill.thompson@dhs.govX Minh K. Tonthat HNTB 703-253-5952 mtonthat@hntb.comTim Tozer GSA 202-708-9882 Timothy.tozer@gsa.govRuth Trocolli DCSHPO 202-442-8836 Ruth.trocolli@dc.govX Jack Van Dop FHWA 703-404-6282 jack.j.vandop@fhwa.dot.govRob Walker WH Gordon 703-263-1900 rwalker@whgA.comEarl Ward US Coast Guard 434-960-5745 new3m@wirginia.eduJeff Way CI International 610-820-4455 jway@ciinternational.comMichael Weiss WDG 202-857-8300 mweiss@wdgarch.comDanielle Wesolek WMATA 202-962-1214 dwesolek@wmata.comNicole White Symmetra Design 202-370-6000 nwhite@symmetradesign.comX Jon Whitney HNTB 703-969-8269 jwhitney@hntb.comBrenda Williams QEA 734-926-0419 bwilliams@quinnevans.comWilliam Willis GSA 202-441-0088 williamb.willis@gsa.govCatriona Winter Clark 240-882-4758 Catriona.winter@clarkconstruction.comX Nancy Witherell GSA 202-482-7239 nancy.witherell@gsa.govCarter Wormeley GSA 202-401-9691 carter.wormeley@gsa.govCraig Wright McKissack & McKissak 202-220-0144 craigw@mckissackdc.comMina Wright GSA 202-406-4520Tamara Zalcim Georgetown Law Tt2@law.Georgetown.eduNell Ziehl NTHP 202 588-6040 nell_ziehl@nthp.orgPage 20 of 20