5 - Diagenesis

Recommendations

Info

Press and Siever 2001Small pores, butinterconnected –high permeabilityLarge pores, butnot connected –low permeabilityMoldic porosity
Secondary porosity – Dakota Fm.Interparticle porosity – Dakota Fm.Porosity and PermeabilitySediment Porosity (%) PermeabilityGravel 25 to 40 excellentClean Sand 30 to 50 good to excellentSilt 35 to 50 moderateClay 35 to 80 poorGlacial Till 10 to 20 poor to moderateRock Porosity (%) PermeabilityConglomerate 10 to 30 moderate to excellentSandstone, Well-sorted, little cement 20 to 30 good to very goodAverage 10 to 20 moderate to goodPoorly sorted, Well cemented 0 to 10 poor to moderateShale 0 to 30 very poor to poorLimestone, dolomite 0 to 20 poor to goodCavernous limestone up to 50 excellentCrystalline rockUnfractured 0 to 5 very poorFractured 5 to 10 poorVolcanic Rocks 0 to 50 poor to excellent
Page 1 and 2: DiagenesisChapters 5, 6, 7Diagenesi
Page 3 and 4: Boggs 2001BioturbationCarbonates•
Page 5 and 6: Diagenetic ProcessesMcIlreath and M
Page 7 and 8: Factors influencing the solubility
Page 9 and 10: Chlorite CementBoggs 2001Illite cem
Page 11 and 12: Mineral Replacement• Dissolution
Page 13 and 14: Diagenetic Structures• Liesegange
Page 15 and 16: SEM image of quartzovergrowth (Q),c
Page 17: Secondary Porosity• Development o
Page 21 and 22: van Krevelen plotSummary• Diagene

5 - Diagenesis

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?