Evaluation form – critical appraisal of a topic - Australian and New ...
Evaluation form – critical appraisal of a topic - Australian and New ...
Evaluation form – critical appraisal of a topic - Australian and New ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ABN 82 055 042 852Records ManagementCritically Appraise a TopicAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALANDCOLLEGE OF ANAESTHETISTSSRACritically appraise a <strong>topic</strong> for internal evaluation <strong>and</strong> present it to the departmentThis evaluation <strong>form</strong> should be used by the departmental scholar role tutor or their nominee (who must beeligible to per<strong>form</strong> workplace-based assessments), to evaluate the <strong>critical</strong> <strong>appraisal</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>topic</strong>, undertakenby the trainee <strong>and</strong> presented to the department.The <strong>form</strong> should be forwarded to the supervisor <strong>of</strong> training, for confirmation <strong>of</strong> the activity. Please do notsend the <strong>form</strong> to the College. It may be retained by the trainee for their records.1. PERSONAL INFORMATIONANZCA ID:Family name:First Name:Middle Name:2. EVALUATION DETAILSTitle <strong>of</strong> <strong>critical</strong> <strong>appraisal</strong>:Date <strong>of</strong> departmental presentation:Day Month Year<strong>Evaluation</strong> completed by:3. EVALUATIONDate:Day Month YearNotper<strong>form</strong>edImprovementrequiredWas the <strong>appraisal</strong> focused by a well-built question?(Use <strong>of</strong> PICO <strong>form</strong>at)Comments on question <strong>form</strong>ulation including what was done well <strong>and</strong> what could be improved upon:Per<strong>form</strong>anceacceptableWas an explicit <strong>and</strong> sensible process used to identify <strong>and</strong> select theevidence?Was the evidence appraised the best available to answer the questioni.e. key studies were not overlooked?Comments on search strategy <strong>and</strong> results including what was done well <strong>and</strong> what could be improved upon:28 May 2013PAGE 1 OF 2
ANZCA ID:AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALANDCOLLEGE OF ANAESTHETISTSWere appropriate validity criteria applied to the evidence appraised?Notper<strong>form</strong>edImprovementrequiredPer<strong>form</strong>anceacceptableComments on the <strong>appraisal</strong> <strong>of</strong> the evidence including what was done well <strong>and</strong> what could be improved upon:How strong is the conclusion?Does the <strong>appraisal</strong> address if the conclusion can be applied in theworkplace <strong>and</strong> to patients (where applicable)?Were all clinically important outcomes, benefits, harms <strong>and</strong> costsdiscussed?Has the author introduced a bias based on a conflict <strong>of</strong> interest/stronglyheld belief?Overall comments on production <strong>and</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>appraisal</strong> including what was done well <strong>and</strong> what could be improvedupon:Adapted with thanks to the Department <strong>of</strong> Anaesthesia <strong>and</strong> Perioperative Medicine, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia28 May 2013PAGE 2 OF 2