03.12.2012 Views

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The New Sartre: A Postmodern Progenitor? 119<br />

Fortunately there was Sartre. Sartre was our Outside, he was really the<br />

breath of fresh air from the backyard [...]. And Sartre has never stopped<br />

being that, not a model, a method or an example, but a little fresh air—a<br />

gust of air even when he had just been to the Cafe* Flore—an intellectual<br />

who singularly changed the situation of the intellectual. 41<br />

Similarly, despite his previous criticisms of Sartre in the 1960s and<br />

1970s, in the lead article for the commemorative fiftieth anniversary issue<br />

of Les Temps modernes, Derrida expresses the "boundless gratitude" and<br />

acknowledges the "immense debt" he and others owe to Sartre. He<br />

confesses that in previous years he "wouldn't have dared" admit his<br />

affection for Sartre and Les Temps modernes, but that he is now moved to<br />

"do justice" to them and recognise the value of <strong>Sartre's</strong> philosophical<br />

ceuvre. 42 Even Baudrillard, the arch-sceptic of postmodernity, acknowledges<br />

the enormity of <strong>Sartre's</strong> influence on post-war French intellectual<br />

life and how the "theory of commitment through Sartre in the 1960s [...]<br />

had been more or less the point of departure for intellectuals". 43<br />

Since his death in 1980, however, commitment has seemingly died<br />

with Sartre. The postmodern condition presented by Baudrillard and others<br />

is one in which apathy, nihilism, melancholy and withdrawal are seen as<br />

appropriate responses to a prevailing situation characterised by meaninglessness,<br />

simulation, hyperconformity and the absence of grand-narratives<br />

that claim a better future for human society. In contrast with Baudrillard's<br />

asemic political vision, that celebrates the death of meaning and the futility<br />

of political action and engagement, <strong>Sartre's</strong> political itinerary is an<br />

evolving story of progressive radicalisation, a ceaseless journey to explore<br />

the radical possibilities and complex dimensions of freedom, with a view<br />

to making the world a less alienating and oppressive home. Shortly before<br />

his death, in the course of interviews with Benny Le\y (published in<br />

March 1980 as VEspoir maintenant [Hope Now]), Sartre identifies hope<br />

as a means of overcoming the malaise of apathy and despair that<br />

characterises the postmodern world of the late twentieth <strong>century</strong>:<br />

What with the third world war that can break out at any day, and the<br />

wretched mess our planet has become, despair has come back to tempt me<br />

with the idea that there is no end to it all, that there is no goal, that there<br />

are only small, individual objectives that we fight for. We make small<br />

revolutions, but there's no human end, there's nothing of concern to human<br />

beings, there's only disorder [...]. In any event, the world seems ugly, evil,<br />

41 Deleuze, Dialogues, 12.<br />

42 Derrida, "II courait mort", 44,40 (my translations).<br />

43 In Gane, Baudrillard: Critical and Fatal Theory, 17.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!