Sartre's second century
Sartre's second century
Sartre's second century
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The New Sartre: A Postmodern Progenitor? 119<br />
Fortunately there was Sartre. Sartre was our Outside, he was really the<br />
breath of fresh air from the backyard [...]. And Sartre has never stopped<br />
being that, not a model, a method or an example, but a little fresh air—a<br />
gust of air even when he had just been to the Cafe* Flore—an intellectual<br />
who singularly changed the situation of the intellectual. 41<br />
Similarly, despite his previous criticisms of Sartre in the 1960s and<br />
1970s, in the lead article for the commemorative fiftieth anniversary issue<br />
of Les Temps modernes, Derrida expresses the "boundless gratitude" and<br />
acknowledges the "immense debt" he and others owe to Sartre. He<br />
confesses that in previous years he "wouldn't have dared" admit his<br />
affection for Sartre and Les Temps modernes, but that he is now moved to<br />
"do justice" to them and recognise the value of <strong>Sartre's</strong> philosophical<br />
ceuvre. 42 Even Baudrillard, the arch-sceptic of postmodernity, acknowledges<br />
the enormity of <strong>Sartre's</strong> influence on post-war French intellectual<br />
life and how the "theory of commitment through Sartre in the 1960s [...]<br />
had been more or less the point of departure for intellectuals". 43<br />
Since his death in 1980, however, commitment has seemingly died<br />
with Sartre. The postmodern condition presented by Baudrillard and others<br />
is one in which apathy, nihilism, melancholy and withdrawal are seen as<br />
appropriate responses to a prevailing situation characterised by meaninglessness,<br />
simulation, hyperconformity and the absence of grand-narratives<br />
that claim a better future for human society. In contrast with Baudrillard's<br />
asemic political vision, that celebrates the death of meaning and the futility<br />
of political action and engagement, <strong>Sartre's</strong> political itinerary is an<br />
evolving story of progressive radicalisation, a ceaseless journey to explore<br />
the radical possibilities and complex dimensions of freedom, with a view<br />
to making the world a less alienating and oppressive home. Shortly before<br />
his death, in the course of interviews with Benny Le\y (published in<br />
March 1980 as VEspoir maintenant [Hope Now]), Sartre identifies hope<br />
as a means of overcoming the malaise of apathy and despair that<br />
characterises the postmodern world of the late twentieth <strong>century</strong>:<br />
What with the third world war that can break out at any day, and the<br />
wretched mess our planet has become, despair has come back to tempt me<br />
with the idea that there is no end to it all, that there is no goal, that there<br />
are only small, individual objectives that we fight for. We make small<br />
revolutions, but there's no human end, there's nothing of concern to human<br />
beings, there's only disorder [...]. In any event, the world seems ugly, evil,<br />
41 Deleuze, Dialogues, 12.<br />
42 Derrida, "II courait mort", 44,40 (my translations).<br />
43 In Gane, Baudrillard: Critical and Fatal Theory, 17.