myself, to learn and to be corrected or changed. My attitude is then one <strong>of</strong> docility,intense attention, expectation, hope. I will call this attitude positive Godfeeling. Ireact negatively when I reject the self-sickness because I wish to stay “put” and,as a means <strong>of</strong> doing so, proceed to cover up my actual state both from myself andothers. I then defend myself by direct or indirect self-explanation or self-laudationand by fear, suspicion or scorn <strong>of</strong> whatever provokes the revolutionary urge in me.My self-defence may consist <strong>of</strong> any one <strong>of</strong> an infinite number <strong>of</strong> negative attitudesranging from flagrant self-assertion and violent destructiveness at one end <strong>of</strong> thescale to boredom or pathological taedium vitae* at the other. Any one <strong>of</strong> these I willcall negative Godfeeling.Everyone <strong>of</strong> us at every moment has either negative or positive Godfeeling.COMPREHENDING GODWe comprehend God when we understand such truths as those embodied in thestatements which have here been put forward in the definition <strong>of</strong> God. That is tosay, when we understand that all instances <strong>of</strong> absolute love or wisdom, for example,are instances <strong>of</strong> the same love or wisdom, that all the absolutes are one, that theirnumber is infinite and that each <strong>of</strong> them is infinite. This is the comprehension <strong>of</strong>the unity <strong>of</strong> God—<strong>of</strong> the fact that all the many glimpses are revelations <strong>of</strong> thesame perfection—and <strong>of</strong> His infinity. It is got by reflecting on and comparing manyintuitions <strong>of</strong> absolute love, power, wisdom, etc., and is an affair <strong>of</strong> the intellect orthe “head” rather than <strong>of</strong> the “heart.” Nevertheless, it comes to us clearly only aswe progress in that changing-healing-making process in which God purifies ourhearts, perhaps because only in that process do we attend enough to instances <strong>of</strong>absolute love, power, wisdom, etc. To behold God even intellectually we must bepure <strong>of</strong> heart.I may sum up by saying that so far I have shown that God is a fact because wesee Him, because we feel Him and because we comprehend Him. To show that Heis also a fact because He acts on us we shall have to look closely into the changinghealing-making process to which I have up to now only referred. Before we can dothis we must examine the term correlative to God, namely myself, since, as I said atthe beginning, either term can be understood only by the side <strong>of</strong> the other. To thisexamination we shall now proceed.* stepstudy’s note: “Taedium vitae” means “weariness with life.”46
IIMYSELFI AM NOT GOD<strong>The</strong> objection likely to be most commonly brought against what I have said willprobably run as follows. “Of course what you have defined as God stands for a fact,but that fact is something in yourself and other selves. <strong>The</strong>re is no need to supposea power outside yourself. It is yourself.”Now, the fundamental distinction between man and God is, I have already said,that man is finite and God is infinite. But to work out that distinction we should haveto examine the notions <strong>of</strong> finite and infinite and <strong>of</strong> time and eternity, and this wouldtake us away from our purpose <strong>of</strong> describing in order to help men understand, desireand make progress in, the changing-healing-making process which is the experience<strong>of</strong> God. Here it will be right to confine ourselves to those distinctions the making <strong>of</strong>which will forward that purpose.With that experience in view, then, I will say that, since God (that is, absolute love,wisdom, etc.) and myself (as distinguished from my body) are not things in space,God is neither in me nor outside me, literally speaking. Speaking metaphorically,God is certainly not outside me: the experience <strong>of</strong> Him at its best is best describedby the phrase “God in me, I in God,” the meaning <strong>of</strong> which can only be understoodif we have had the experience.<strong>The</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the objection which calls for consideration is the statement that Godis just myself. (I pass over the possibility <strong>of</strong> His being my fellowmen but not myself,because, if I am convinced that he is not myself, I—resembling in this everybodyelse—will have no difficulty in believing that He is no one else amongst humanbeings.) Now, much as it would flatter me to be taken for God, I must decline thecompliment in the interest <strong>of</strong> intelligibility. For I can only describe my experience<strong>of</strong> God by saying that I appeal to God and that He helps me in a way in which Icannot appeal to myself or be helped by myself. What is more, I cannot have thatexperience, or at least not to the extent to which it is possible to have it, so long as Ihave at the back <strong>of</strong> my mind the inhibiting idea that that way <strong>of</strong> speaking about Godis only metaphorical and that God is really myself, just as I could not have full andsatisfactory relations with my fellowmen if I thought that these were really myselfor projections <strong>of</strong> myself, in which case my relations would be so unsatisfactory thatI should probably be put away in a lunatic asylum. I must therefore emphaticallyinsist that God is not myself, in the sense that I can appeal to Him and that He cananswer and help me, just as I must insist that another human being is not myself, inthe sense that I can appeal to him and that he can answer and help me.47
- Page 1 and 2: The Philosophyof Courageor The Oxfo
- Page 3 and 4: fear of being creative and being ou
- Page 5 and 6: truly were. There was also a spirit
- Page 7 and 8: Comparison with Bill W. and A.A.on
- Page 9 and 10: I must embrace my own feeling of so
- Page 11 and 12: Alcoholism and addiction asforms of
- Page 13 and 14: specifications as to how that is to
- Page 15 and 16: perfect serenity. By shutting off a
- Page 17 and 18: The act of total surrender allows t
- Page 19 and 20: this. But you do not have to be any
- Page 21 and 22: NOTES ON CHAPTER 3. SHARING OR SPRE
- Page 23 and 24: [chapter 3, section II]If I am succ
- Page 25 and 26: NOTES ON CHAPTER 4. CHANGING SOCIET
- Page 27 and 28: The Oxford Group and Alcoholics Ano
- Page 29 and 30: view Press, 2000) 28. “Sick origi
- Page 31 and 32: INTRODUCTIONThe world is going mad,
- Page 33 and 34: TRUE RELIGIONWhy are you cowards, p
- Page 35 and 36: CONTENTSIntroductionTrue Religion31
- Page 37 and 38: to do the same for the term “pixi
- Page 39 and 40: the power which is God or from God.
- Page 41 and 42: God. The reader who is asked to con
- Page 43 and 44: these qualities and on the relation
- Page 45: y the power of God. But it is not n
- Page 49 and 50: DISEASE OR FEAR: MANIAWhat is wrong
- Page 51 and 52: impurity which is denoted by the si
- Page 53 and 54: occasions when he is threatened wit
- Page 55 and 56: IIIHEALTH OR PASSIONPURE DESIRESinc
- Page 57 and 58: PASSION AND PARTICULAR DESIRESNot b
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 2DEMONSTRATION BY EXPERIMEN
- Page 61 and 62: to desire passionately to be health
- Page 63 and 64: Conformity with the commandment aga
- Page 65 and 66: IITHE CRUCIAL EXPERIMENT ORTHE QUIE
- Page 67 and 68: and hypocrisy, that judged by absol
- Page 69 and 70: not meant; that the fool was not as
- Page 71 and 72: hands I commit my spirit.”With th
- Page 73 and 74: that God the Highwayman is really a
- Page 75 and 76: I obey guidance to go and see a man
- Page 77 and 78: foreseen or seen as I have represen
- Page 79 and 80: AN ILLUSTRATIONBecause the checking
- Page 81 and 82: IVTHE QUITE TIME AND THEH WORKING D
- Page 83 and 84: NEED FOR AN ADEQUATE PSYCHOLOGY OF
- Page 85 and 86: only to poets. But to judge from on
- Page 87 and 88: For the first time passion or the r
- Page 89 and 90: HEAVENWhat I have come to is Heaven
- Page 91 and 92: For Heaven is now no longer a dream
- Page 93 and 94: I am contiguous with other selves i
- Page 95 and 96: expanses of self, seem to be experi
- Page 97 and 98:
IITHE STRATEGY OF THE LARGER SELFGO
- Page 99 and 100:
FEAR CONCEALS FEARNow the procedure
- Page 101 and 102:
exposure of the “universe.” Tru
- Page 103 and 104:
IIITHE STRATEGY AGAINST THE LARGER
- Page 105 and 106:
his own. The miracle of self-consci
- Page 107 and 108:
usiness, for government, for the na
- Page 109 and 110:
and then make him follow its course
- Page 111 and 112:
importance to the Company. However,
- Page 113 and 114:
of smugness, self-satisfaction and
- Page 115 and 116:
PREOCCUPATION WITH SYMPTOMSWhen “
- Page 117 and 118:
channel through which collective gu
- Page 119 and 120:
abyss and the area coincide. It is
- Page 121 and 122:
IVTHE ECONOMIC PROBLEMTHE ECONOMIC
- Page 123 and 124:
that need or greed, and not the cap
- Page 125 and 126:
VPOLITICAL SCIENCEUNCHANGED POLITIC
- Page 127 and 128:
it, by blaming other people instead
- Page 129 and 130:
VIPHILOSOPHY AND ARTTHE SINS OF THE
- Page 131 and 132:
For expression or projection is the
- Page 133 and 134:
DENYING THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE
- Page 135 and 136:
which the errors are designed to pr
- Page 137 and 138:
A PERSONAL NOTEThe philosophy given
- Page 139 and 140:
the formation of sacred stereotypes