Chapter 1UNDENIABLE FACTSUndeniable facts are inescapable facts.God and myself are for me such facts.IGOD: THE ABSOLUTES OR PURITIESSTARTING POINTSIt is the ambition <strong>of</strong> every philosopher to start his discussion with some factor facts which no one can deny. <strong>The</strong> facts with which I propose to start here asundeniable are God and myself.A fact to me in the fullest sense <strong>of</strong> the word is that which acts on me, which Icomprehend by my thought and which in some sense I see and feel. An undeniablefact Is one from which I cannot get away.I cannot get away either from God or from myself. Being unable to get awayfrom them, I consider it the part <strong>of</strong> wisdom and, therefore, <strong>of</strong> philosophy, whichoriginally meant the love <strong>of</strong> wisdom, to start with them as well as to end withthem.God and myself are, like father and child, correlative terms: one cannot beproperly understood apart from the other. What is more important, in the case <strong>of</strong>God and myself my consciousness <strong>of</strong> either is pr<strong>of</strong>itable for my life only in so far asit is also the consciousness <strong>of</strong> the other and <strong>of</strong> the relation between the two. Thiswill be demonstrated and illustrated almost at every step in the following pages.DEFINITIONSIt is possible to define or to give the meaning <strong>of</strong> a term without maintaining thatthe term stands for anything real. Thus, I can say what is meant by “pixies,” whileat the same time declaring that there are no such things as pixies. What immediatelyfollows is given as mere definition <strong>of</strong> the term “God.” But, because I believe thatphilosophy should all the time deal with experience, I will draw even my definitionfrom experience—the experience, in fact, with which this book will deal all thetime. Nevertheless, the unbelieving reader, to whom the term “God” is like the term“pixie,” may discount all allegation <strong>of</strong> experience and take it that in the definitionI am merely inviting him to consider certain notions for which the term “God” hasstood or stands and the connections between these notions, just as I might ask him36
to do the same for the term “pixie.” To this consideration I am inviting him becauseonly after it will he be able to decide whether the term “God” stands for anythingreal, and if it does, whether it is necessary for denoting that reality or whether thereality is already adequately covered by some other term.GOD AS POWERFrom the most primitive times men have thought <strong>of</strong> God as power. In the NewTestament also “the Power,” Dynamis, is a synonym for God,* while the chief pro<strong>of</strong>s<strong>of</strong> Jesus’ special connection with God are considered there to be his “powers,” ashis miracles are called in the Greek. It is significant that they consist chiefly in thehealing <strong>of</strong> mental diseases (cases <strong>of</strong> possession) and <strong>of</strong> physical ills, and that they aremost striking and disturbing as evidences <strong>of</strong> the divine precisely to those people whodo not believe in Jesus and have no love for him. In all ages, primitive or late, unlessmen already love God, they must be faced with the notion <strong>of</strong> Him as power. Forthen the only reason they can accept for concerning themselves with God is, to puta crude fact crudely, that they have got themselves into a mess (mental and physicalills) and that they need some extraordinary power to get them out <strong>of</strong> it. In ourage there is a particular need to recall men to this idea <strong>of</strong> God as power, because,while the mess is greater than it has ever been, in proportion as the world <strong>of</strong> menis a vaster and more complex thing than ever before, at the same time, even whenmen believe in God, they have practically ceased to think <strong>of</strong> Him as power and,instead, associate with the name only the ideas, <strong>of</strong> duty, idealism, mild benevolenceor sentimental kindness. So much is this the case that in speaking about God to mostbelievers it is necessary, if we would make an impression, almost to avoid the word“God,” certainly to get away from familiar language about Him and to borrowone’s terms from medicine, or the science <strong>of</strong> electricity, or anything rather thanreligion. If this produces a shock, the shock is no greater, and no less beneficial, thanthe one we get when we pass from the language <strong>of</strong> the English Bible, excellent butmade comfortable by the mere force <strong>of</strong> custom, to the original Hebrew or Greek.When I speak <strong>of</strong> God as power, I mean positive or constructive power orefficiency and not negative or destructive and obstructive power, I can judgebest <strong>of</strong> the power <strong>of</strong> God from that <strong>of</strong> the men who are inspired by Him: justas inefficiency, impotence, destruction and obstruction are more evident in manymen thrown together but failing to cooperate than they are in one man, so thisconstructive power is best seen in many men together, in the smooth running <strong>of</strong> lifebetween them or in the perfection <strong>of</strong> relationships. I will try and give a picture <strong>of</strong>what happens when two or three or more are gathered together under the control<strong>of</strong> that Power. If the reader cannot recognise it as a description <strong>of</strong> anything that heknows from experience, he can treat it as my idea <strong>of</strong> what is possible or at any rate* Matt. xxvi, 64; Mark xiv, 62; Luke xxii, 69.37
- Page 1 and 2: The Philosophyof Courageor The Oxfo
- Page 3 and 4: fear of being creative and being ou
- Page 5 and 6: truly were. There was also a spirit
- Page 7 and 8: Comparison with Bill W. and A.A.on
- Page 9 and 10: I must embrace my own feeling of so
- Page 11 and 12: Alcoholism and addiction asforms of
- Page 13 and 14: specifications as to how that is to
- Page 15 and 16: perfect serenity. By shutting off a
- Page 17 and 18: The act of total surrender allows t
- Page 19 and 20: this. But you do not have to be any
- Page 21 and 22: NOTES ON CHAPTER 3. SHARING OR SPRE
- Page 23 and 24: [chapter 3, section II]If I am succ
- Page 25 and 26: NOTES ON CHAPTER 4. CHANGING SOCIET
- Page 27 and 28: The Oxford Group and Alcoholics Ano
- Page 29 and 30: view Press, 2000) 28. “Sick origi
- Page 31 and 32: INTRODUCTIONThe world is going mad,
- Page 33 and 34: TRUE RELIGIONWhy are you cowards, p
- Page 35: CONTENTSIntroductionTrue Religion31
- Page 39 and 40: the power which is God or from God.
- Page 41 and 42: God. The reader who is asked to con
- Page 43 and 44: these qualities and on the relation
- Page 45 and 46: y the power of God. But it is not n
- Page 47 and 48: IIMYSELFI AM NOT GODThe objection l
- Page 49 and 50: DISEASE OR FEAR: MANIAWhat is wrong
- Page 51 and 52: impurity which is denoted by the si
- Page 53 and 54: occasions when he is threatened wit
- Page 55 and 56: IIIHEALTH OR PASSIONPURE DESIRESinc
- Page 57 and 58: PASSION AND PARTICULAR DESIRESNot b
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 2DEMONSTRATION BY EXPERIMEN
- Page 61 and 62: to desire passionately to be health
- Page 63 and 64: Conformity with the commandment aga
- Page 65 and 66: IITHE CRUCIAL EXPERIMENT ORTHE QUIE
- Page 67 and 68: and hypocrisy, that judged by absol
- Page 69 and 70: not meant; that the fool was not as
- Page 71 and 72: hands I commit my spirit.”With th
- Page 73 and 74: that God the Highwayman is really a
- Page 75 and 76: I obey guidance to go and see a man
- Page 77 and 78: foreseen or seen as I have represen
- Page 79 and 80: AN ILLUSTRATIONBecause the checking
- Page 81 and 82: IVTHE QUITE TIME AND THEH WORKING D
- Page 83 and 84: NEED FOR AN ADEQUATE PSYCHOLOGY OF
- Page 85 and 86: only to poets. But to judge from on
- Page 87 and 88:
For the first time passion or the r
- Page 89 and 90:
HEAVENWhat I have come to is Heaven
- Page 91 and 92:
For Heaven is now no longer a dream
- Page 93 and 94:
I am contiguous with other selves i
- Page 95 and 96:
expanses of self, seem to be experi
- Page 97 and 98:
IITHE STRATEGY OF THE LARGER SELFGO
- Page 99 and 100:
FEAR CONCEALS FEARNow the procedure
- Page 101 and 102:
exposure of the “universe.” Tru
- Page 103 and 104:
IIITHE STRATEGY AGAINST THE LARGER
- Page 105 and 106:
his own. The miracle of self-consci
- Page 107 and 108:
usiness, for government, for the na
- Page 109 and 110:
and then make him follow its course
- Page 111 and 112:
importance to the Company. However,
- Page 113 and 114:
of smugness, self-satisfaction and
- Page 115 and 116:
PREOCCUPATION WITH SYMPTOMSWhen “
- Page 117 and 118:
channel through which collective gu
- Page 119 and 120:
abyss and the area coincide. It is
- Page 121 and 122:
IVTHE ECONOMIC PROBLEMTHE ECONOMIC
- Page 123 and 124:
that need or greed, and not the cap
- Page 125 and 126:
VPOLITICAL SCIENCEUNCHANGED POLITIC
- Page 127 and 128:
it, by blaming other people instead
- Page 129 and 130:
VIPHILOSOPHY AND ARTTHE SINS OF THE
- Page 131 and 132:
For expression or projection is the
- Page 133 and 134:
DENYING THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE
- Page 135 and 136:
which the errors are designed to pr
- Page 137 and 138:
A PERSONAL NOTEThe philosophy given
- Page 139 and 140:
the formation of sacred stereotypes