17MB PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies
17MB PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies 17MB PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies
permanent river in the area is the Rio Sabinas, which runs east-westthrough the park bisecting the Sierra de Gomas at one point, forminga very impressive canyon. The relief in the area varies from anelevation of 2000 feet in the deserts to 7300 feet at the higherpoints of the Sierra de Gomas. Sierra de Carrizal reaches an elevationof 6,300 feet and Sierra de Enmedio is 6,083 feet high.The climate of the area varies with the seasons and also withaltitude. The low deserts are generally qUite hot during the summermonths and mild the rest of the year, except for occasional coldfronts which get far enough south to effect the area. In the higherparts of the mountains, the summer temperature is milder than atlower elevations, although the sun is still very intense in unshadedareas. During the winter the high mountains are cool and sometimescovered with a blanket of snow. Vacationing in the park will bemost comfortable in the spring, fall, and winter, although theprimary attraction, the cavern, can be comfortably visited any timeof the year.GEOLOGY:The geology of the Sierra de Gomas in which the cave is locatedis one of deposition and later orogenic uplifting. The mountainsare formed of massively bedded Cretaceous limestone which has beenfolded to form an anticlinal range, dipping to either side intosediment-filled valleys of a more recent period. Steep canyons havecut into the mountains at numerous points and at their base have depositedalluvial fans. It is upon oneof these fans that the primaryfacilities and visitors' center will be proposed. The Sierra deEnmedio has a similar geologic history, but the Sierra de Carrizal isof a completely different nature. It is igneous in origin, andrather than forming a long ridge of mountains such as the previoustwo, it has formed a large dome-shaped mountain mass. Also locatedwithin the park boundaries are other prominent geologic features,such as hog-backed ridges and mesas.CULTURE:The principal centers of habitation in the region surroundingthe park are Sabinas Hidalgo, Villaldama, Bustamante, Potrero, andCandela. According to the 1960 census of the state of Nuevo Leon,the popUlation of these towns are: Sabinas Hidalgo, 15,425;Villaldama, 4,337; Bustamante, 2,791; and Potrero, 500.Most of the people from Sabinas Hidalgo work as farmers andcattle ranchers, but there is a minor amount of manufacturing ofbrooms and women's and children's clothing. It is the most importanttown of the region and has two elementary schools, a high school,and a normal school; there is a church, two movie theaters, manygroceries, pharmacies, hotels, restaurants, social clubs, and twopublic pools.The people from Bustamante, Villaldama, and Candela are farmersand cattle ranchers, although there are others employed in the distillingof a yucca-like plant (sotol) to make an intOXicating drinkand in the extraction of fiber from the lechiguilla to make cords.Each of these towns has an elementary school, a church, a hotel,and small shops of various kinds. Judicial authorities representingthe federal government are located at Villaldama.There are telegraph, telephone, post office service at each ofthese towns and the National Railway from Mexico City to Nuevo Laredotraverses the entire area and has stations for or at Potrero,94
Villaldama, Bustamante, and Candela.At present there is a highway from Sabinas Hidalgo, on Mexico 85,to Villaldama and Bustamante and another highway which is soon to becompleted that will parallel the railroad and form a new link betweenNuevo Laredo and Monterrey.REGIONAL PLAN:The location of the Parque Nacional de la Gruta del Palmitowould have many advantages as far as accessibility, due to the proximityof the Inter-American Highway (Mexico 85) and Mexico 57, whichis also a primary route from the U.S. to Mexico City. There are alsolarge population centers near enough to the park to provide weekendrecreational enjoyment. Monterrey would be located thirty miles tothe south of the southern end of the park and sixty miles from thecavern and visitors' center. Saltillo would be only fifty-five milesfurther. Monclova would be sixty miles west of the park and NuevoLaredo and Laredo would be one hundred miles to the northeast. Othermajor population centers which would be within six hours driving distancewould be Tampico, Ciudad Victoria, San Luis Potosi, Zacatecas,Durango, Torreon, Matamoros, Brownsville, Corpus Christi, and SanAntonio, all of which have populations of 100,000 or more.Due to the nature of a developed cave, people could corne to thepark and visit only the cavern, or they could spend more time inthe area and take advantage of the many other featu~es the parkwould provide. This short-visit potential offered by the cavernwould att~act many people traveling on Mexico 85 and Mexico 57.Its close proximity to the U.S. would provide a good opportunityfor many people who would like to visit MeXiCO, but who do not careto travel deep into the country. In this respect there might bean agreement made between the U.S. and MeXican governments to permitfree travel between the U.S. and the park by way of the Nuevo LaredoBustamante highway and to provide check points at the other eXits tothe park to prevent illegal entry into the country. A similar proposalis being considered for the proposed Big Bend InternationalPark in west Texas and northern Coahuila.The U.S. National Park Service has classified park visitorsinto three categories, all of which would use this proposed park.They are:A. Residents adjacent to park area whose visit does notinvolve overnight stay when recreation area visited,usually a day trip.B. People four to six hours driving distance from park,usually having a set destination where one or twonights will be spent. They may participate in severalrecreational actiVities, but usually stay close totheir overnight stopping place.C. People who reside a considerable distance from therecreational region. They will usually spend one ortwo nights at different locations in the recreationalregion.The concept which I propose is a mUlti-purpose use of the park,incorporating as many of the park features as possible and usingthem to their maximum potential. The proposed actiVities and aimsof the park are as follows:95
- Page 47 and 48: Entrance to Cueva del Salitre.Photo
- Page 49 and 50: On July 12 I had an hour's intervie
- Page 51 and 52: THE ASSOCIATION FORMEXICAN CAVE STU
- Page 53 and 54: One of the many Santa Fe dirt sinks
- Page 55 and 56: 330 feet. At the bottom along one s
- Page 57 and 58: species of milliped of a group not
- Page 59 and 60: secondary opening one-third of the
- Page 61 and 62: After a perusal of our topo maps th
- Page 64 and 65: HUAUTLA DE JIMENEZ, OAXACAAREA SKET
- Page 66 and 67: 11. Pit just down hill from pit 10.
- Page 68 and 69: 21. SOTANO DE SAN AGUSTIN - This s6
- Page 70 and 71: LOWERENTRANC.EPROI="ILEuppeR£NTRAN
- Page 72 and 73: RECENT PAPERS ON MEXICAN CAVE BIOLO
- Page 74 and 75: here from Gruta del Palmito, Nuevo
- Page 76 and 77: THE ASSOCIATION FOR MEXICAN CAVE ST
- Page 78 and 79: View north along valley of the Inte
- Page 80 and 81: Typical fissure passages in S6tano
- Page 82 and 83: valley below the resurgences were d
- Page 84 and 85: point on, green mosses cover the wa
- Page 86 and 87: Persons: John Fish, David McKenzie,
- Page 88 and 89: Buena la dozen eager guides led us
- Page 90 and 91: los Riscos (see sketch map on page
- Page 92 and 93: Persons: Jim and Barbara Hershberge
- Page 94 and 95: 20' PITENTRANCE L-l. ", ...,\ '-'-~
- Page 96 and 97: Editor's Note: The following propos
- Page 100 and 101: Develop the cavern and an access to
- Page 102 and 103: OF THEPROPOSEDPARQUE NACIONAL DE LA
- Page 104 and 105: 100area, was rather surprising, sin
- Page 106 and 107: 1.2.3.4.5.6.MEXICAN CAVE BIOLOGY:AN
- Page 108 and 109: 15.16.17.18.19.Reddell" James R. 19
- Page 110 and 111: THE ASSOCIATION FORMEXICAN CAVE STU
- Page 112 and 113: 107NEWSNOTESTABLE OF CONTENTSTRIP R
- Page 114 and 115: 109CAVEMAPSDuring the past six year
- Page 116 and 117: 111CAVES OF GUERRERO AND MORELOSJOH
- Page 118 and 119: 113in the volcanic detrital deposit
- Page 120 and 121: 115CAVE DESCRIPTIONSGRUTA DE ACUITL
- Page 122 and 123: 117CUEVA DE CARLOS PACHECOcavecavec
- Page 124 and 125: 119CUEVA DEL DIABLOLocation:Descrip
- Page 126 and 127: 121References:levels. The entrance
- Page 128 and 129: 123decorated passage which extends
- Page 130 and 131: 125collections by Stanley Kiem (Loo
- Page 132 and 133: 1279.10.11.12.13.14.caves or cave-l
- Page 135: THE ASSOCIATION FORMEXICAN CAVE STU
- Page 138 and 139: 131TABLE OF CONTENTSNEWS NOTES. ...
- Page 140 and 141: NENCINO - JULILO ROADSSOTANO DE SAN
- Page 142 and 143: FEETo100SOTANO DE LA JOYAJOYA DE SA
- Page 144 and 145: 137had not been checked was followe
- Page 146 and 147: 139a high mountain karst area with
Villaldama, Bustamante, and Candela.At present there is a highway from Sabinas Hidalgo, on Mexico 85,to Villaldama and Bustamante and another highway which is soon to becompleted that will parallel the railroad and <strong>for</strong>m a new link betweenNuevo Laredo and Monterrey.REGIONAL PLAN:The location of the Parque Nacional de la Gruta del Palmitowould have many advantages as far as accessibility, due to the proximityof the Inter-American Highway (Mexico 85) and Mexico 57, whichis also a primary route from the U.S. to Mexico City. There are alsolarge population centers near enough to the park to provide weekendrecreational enjoyment. Monterrey would be located thirty miles tothe south of the southern end of the park and sixty miles from thecavern and visitors' center. Saltillo would be only fifty-five milesfurther. Monclova would be sixty miles west of the park and NuevoLaredo and Laredo would be one hundred miles to the northeast. Othermajor population centers which would be within six hours driving distancewould be Tampico, Ciudad Victoria, San Luis Potosi, Zacatecas,Durango, Torreon, Matamoros, Brownsville, Corpus Christi, and SanAntonio, all of which have populations of 100,000 or more.Due to the nature of a developed cave, people could corne to thepark and visit only the cavern, or they could spend more time inthe area and take advantage of the many other featu~es the parkwould provide. This short-visit potential offered by the cavernwould att~act many people traveling on Mexico 85 and Mexico 57.Its close proximity to the U.S. would provide a good opportunity<strong>for</strong> many people who would like to visit MeXiCO, but who do not careto travel deep into the country. In this respect there might bean agreement made between the U.S. and MeXican governments to permitfree travel between the U.S. and the park by way of the Nuevo LaredoBustamante highway and to provide check points at the other eXits tothe park to prevent illegal entry into the country. A similar proposalis being considered <strong>for</strong> the proposed Big Bend InternationalPark in west Texas and northern Coahuila.The U.S. National Park Service has classified park visitorsinto three categories, all of which would use this proposed park.They are:A. Residents adjacent to park area whose visit does notinvolve overnight stay when recreation area visited,usually a day trip.B. People four to six hours driving distance from park,usually having a set destination where one or twonights will be spent. They may participate in severalrecreational actiVities, but usually stay close totheir overnight stopping place.C. People who reside a considerable distance from therecreational region. They will usually spend one ortwo nights at different locations in the recreationalregion.The concept which I propose is a mUlti-purpose use of the park,incorporating as many of the park features as possible and usingthem to their maximum potential. The proposed actiVities and aimsof the park are as follows:95